search for: rudd

...ient will > re-do the DC search without including site in DNS request. This means the > client will try to find an available DC among all DC of your domain. > > Could be also DNS issue I think but not enough information to tell for now. > > > 2016-03-23 14:21 GMT+01:00 Nicholas Rudd <nicholas.m.rudd at gmail.com>: > >> So a little background, in my domain we have 2 domain controllers, the >> main >> (A Windows Server 2008 R2), and a secondary that is was recently migrated >> from Server 2003 R2 to Samba. Both domain controllers are offsite so w...

Sorry, what does "PC" mean here? ________________________________ From: Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.com> Sent: Thursday, November 8, 2018 7:27 AM To: Jordan Rudd; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Passing stack pointer to statepoint-gc Jordon, First of all, StackMaps are keyed by PC, not by SP. Each entry corresponds to given location within the generated code. This isn't something you want to do in generated code. Your runtime...

...is interesting becuase the IP that it is looking for is not mine, mine is ip-172-31-15-161.ad.mylocaldomain.com , I have logged into the DNS management console many times and checked the records on the second (and first) domain controller and the records look correct. Any suggestions? -- Nicholas Rudd

...confusion.  Can you take a look and let me know if you have further questions?  Start with the revised Stack Map Format section. Philip p.s. I just submitted this and it'll take a few minutes to refresh.  In the meantime, you could look at the diff for 346405. On 11/2/18 2:52 PM, Jordan Rudd via llvm-dev wrote: > Note: These instructions seem to be targeted towards people creating a > JIT. My compiler compiles to native. I suppose I just need a reference > to the stack location of the stack map, wherever that is. > ---------------------------------------------------------...

...available in the AD Site, the client will re-do the DC search without including site in DNS request. This means the client will try to find an available DC among all DC of your domain. Could be also DNS issue I think but not enough information to tell for now. 2016-03-23 14:21 GMT+01:00 Nicholas Rudd <nicholas.m.rudd at gmail.com>: > So a little background, in my domain we have 2 domain controllers, the main > (A Windows Server 2008 R2), and a secondary that is was recently migrated > from Server 2003 R2 to Samba. Both domain controllers are offsite so we use > OpenVpn to con...

On 3/23/2016 12:11 PM, Nicholas Rudd wrote: > > OK, yeah I have a 4.4 domain controller and it reloads automatically, > if they don't already go into affect when you exit the text editor try > restarting smb service, if you don't have the smb service you probably > can just do a system reboot and that will le...

Hi, I'm trying to use the statepoint-example strategy to build a simple garbage collector. After using the PlaceSafepoints and RewriteStatepointsForGC passes, I can successfully generate a stack map in my binary and call into my runtime's gc poll. As far as I can tell, I need the stack pointer at the point of the poll to find the correct frame in the stack map. I'm having trouble

Hi, I'm trying to build a gc using the statepoint-example strategy. However, after hours of searching, reading documentation and trying to find code examples online, I cannot figure out how to access the Stack Map. The documentation for statepoint-example says: The stack map format generated by this GC strategy can be found in the Stack Map

...ontradicting me on Ogg Vorbis performance. I showed the bastard and earned 10 bucks (bet). Note that I still have to test the latest LAME and do graphs. I also should test different original samples. I still want less bitrate and indistinguishable quality on -q 5! =) luck, Manuel Amador (Rudd-O) http://www.usm.edu.ec/~amadorm/ PS: try to CC the list on the replies ;-) --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-dev-request@xiph.org' containing only the wo...

...d Ogg Vorbis support into their hardware? I\'d like to know what\'s taking them so long, and I\'m sure Thomson Multimedia had a lobby too. Luck, great work and many thanks for this amazing software and the effort for ridding the world of software patents, <p> Manuel Amador (Rudd-O) http://www.usm.edu.ec/~amadorm/ --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-dev-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No s...

(quoting from the web archive, I only just subscribed) Monty wrote: > > > (a bit testy that this flamewar has started again, and no one has learned a > > thing from the previous rounds) > > OK, that wasn't fair... the old timers know what's up, but I do wish some of > the folks who bring things up would browse the archive threads or at least not > jump in

I have followed: http://rudd-o.com/en/linux-and-free-software/making-windows-xp-join-a-samba-domain-in-5-minutes and http://samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/ClientConfig.html#WXPP009 and the reg hack even though I'm using Samba 3.3.2 I keep getting the error message: "The following error occured at...

You may have included this in another email however I will ask anyway, did you set DNS to your server in the Linux and Windows clients? Can you check if a Windows Server can join? Can you use DNS management to check the DNS on you samba server? On Mar 28, 2016 2:15 PM, "Dale Schroeder" <dale at briannassaladdressing.com> wrote: > No takers thus far. These are the Samba 4.2

David Mitchell <mitchell@ucar.edu> writes: > Ralph Giles wrote: > > > > On 15 Oct 2000, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > > > > > I don't really know the details of the discussion, but I'd like to > > > present this issue from a user-oriented perspective, and from the > > > perspective of how Nautilus wants to use data files. > >

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, this is a new attempt to improve the output of the command "btrfs fi df". The previous attempt received a good reception. However there was no a general consensus about the wording. Moreover I still didn''t understand how btrfs was using the disks. A my first attempt was to develop a new command which shows how the disks