search for: rrc

2015-10-13 19:40 GMT-04:00 Richard Couture <rrc at linuxcabal.org>: > Note that my original post had -rave as the r is for recursive. > recursive is implied by -a. In other words, -rave is the same as -ave > > I have it working with cmd files, but the point is that I purchased the > GUI to avert the need to send windows use...

...;; def VR128 : RegisterClass<"X86", [v4f32, v2f64, v16i8, v8i16, v4i32, v2i64], 128, (add PR128, FR32)>; I have an entry in X86ISelLowering.cpp: addRegisterClass(MVT::i128, &X86::PR128RegClass); and in findRepresentativeClass(): case MVT::i128: RRC = &X86::PR128RegClass; But even though my nodes have MVT::i128 value type, they get allocated to XMM registers. I have, of course, removed i128 from FR128. What am I missing? Thanks, Barbora -- ---------------- Barbora Murinová The University of Edinburgh SK: +421905718390 UK: +44747783379...

on our cluster that has been running lustre for about 1 month. I have 1 MDT/MGS and 1 OSS with 2 OST''s. Our cluster uses all Gige and has about 608 nodes 1854 cores. We have allot of jobs that die, and/or go into high IO wait, strace shows processes stuck in fstat(). The big problem is (i think) I would like some feedback on it that of these 608 nodes 209 of them have in dmesg

Hello, I''m new to Xen and especially to the hypervisor code. I''m working off a 3.0.4.1 base and have the following questions regarding the memory management code for an x86, 32-bit platform (capable of supporting PAE). I''m doing some research into providing grant table hypercall support from a Windows 2003 HVM. I have made all the necessary changes to allow the

...ll me how to do so?? Like most windows users, my client is terrified of the command prompt. Thanks Richard -- LinuxCabal Asociación Civil Ing. Richard Couture Novell CNE, ECNE, MCNE HP/Compaq ASE Tel.: (+52) (333) 145-2638 Cel.: (+52) (044) 333 377-7505 Web: http://www.LinuxCabal.org E-Mail: rrc at linuxcabal.org Hosted en la nube Cloud Sigma - www.CloudSigma.com AVISO DE CONFIDENCIALIDAD: Este correo electrónico, incluyendo en su caso, los archivos adjuntos al mismo, pueden contener información de carácter confidencial y/o privilegiada, y se envían a la atención única y exclusivamente...

I am having some trouble saving some files to a network share after they have been opened for a few minutes. My case in point is I have samba 2.2.4 setup on redhat 7.3 as a PDC and win2k clients. I have the users saving their outlook.pst to their home directory (H:) and not in their profile. The outlook files are all over 150 meg so trying to save some bandwidth. The users can open outlook,

...ount. But ist not fine to copy this file to all machines. The problem will not be there if I can xp tell to export the outlook folder too. But this work only a few minutes, you can read in my first mail. Regards sven -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: Trevor James Miles [mailto:rbraun3@mbox.rrc.mb.ca] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. Juli 2002 23:59 An: svs@rsnetworx.de Betreff: Re: [Samba] Outlook 2002 and roaming profiles I am not sure how outlook 2k and outlook xp differ, but if you manually move the outlook.pst file, outlook 2k will just ask you where it is. So all I did was map all...

...xt i16 @isNotNegativeUsingCmp(i16 signext %x) { %cmp = icmp sgt i16 %x, -1 %r = zext i1 %cmp to i16 ret i16 %r } And compile that for MSP430: $ ./llc -o - -mtriple=msp430 shift.ll isNotNegativeUsingShift: ; @isNotNegativeUsingShift ; %bb.0: inv r12 swpb r12 mov.b r12, r12 clrc rrc r12 rra r12 rra r12 rra r12 rra r12 rra r12 rra r12 ret isNotNegativeUsingCmp: ; @isNotNegativeUsingCmp ; %bb.0: mov r12, r13 mov #1, r12 tst r13 jge .LBB1_2 ; %bb.1: clr r12 .LBB1_2: ret How do you intend to optimize code that is written in the 1st form? Or is that not allowed i...

...t; > > > > convolve() is one of the very old R functions stemming from > > Auckland already seen in the very first R tarball that's still > > available: Dated from June 20, 1995, with most file dates from > > Jun 16/17, i.e. really of even older date, the file src/rrc/fft > > (no 'library', noR extension yet) contains definitions for 'fft', 'nextn' > > and 'convolve' where the latter was (note the ":=" for what now > > would be assignment to the base package) > > > > convolve := function (a...

...t i16 %x, -1 > %r = zext i1 %cmp to i16 > ret i16 %r > } > > And compile that for MSP430: > $ ./llc -o - -mtriple=msp430 shift.ll > isNotNegativeUsingShift: ; @isNotNegativeUsingShift > ; %bb.0: > inv r12 > swpb r12 > mov.b r12, r12 > clrc > rrc r12 > rra r12 > rra r12 > rra r12 > rra r12 > rra r12 > rra r12 > ret > > isNotNegativeUsingCmp: ; @isNotNegativeUsingCmp > ; %bb.0: > mov r12, r13 > mov #1, r12 > tst r13 > jge .LBB1_2 > ; %bb.1: > clr r12 > .LBB1_2: > ret >...

...a4008d_UUID >>>>>>>> nid 10.164.0.141 at tcp ns: mds-nobackup >>>>>>>> -MDT0000_UUID lock: 00000100476df240/0xbc269e05c512de3a lrc: >>>>>>>> 1/0,0 mode: CR/CR res: 11240142/324715850 bi >>>>>>>> ts 0x5 rrc: 2 type: IBT flags: 20 remote: 0x4e54bc800174cd08 >>>>>>>> expref: 372 pid 26925 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> The client was evicted because of this lock can not be released >>>>>>> on client >>>>>>>...

...bit = lshr i32 %a, 31 > %0 = trunc i32 %a.lobit to i16 > %.not = xor i16 %0, 1 > ret i16 %.not > } > > The backend then turns this into the following totally suboptimal code: > > cmpge32_0: > mov r13, r12 > inv r12 > swpb r12 > mov.b r12, r12 > clrc > rrc r12 > rra r12 > rra r12 > rra r12 > rra r12 > rra r12 > rra r12 > ret > .Lfunc_end0: > .size cmpge32_0, .Lfunc_end0-cmpge32_0 > > > The cause of this anomaly is again the presence of the Shift instruction (%a.lobit > = lshr i32 %a, 31) at the IR level, which i...

...hr i32 %a, 31 > %0 = trunc i32 %a.lobit to i16 > %.not = xor i16 %0, 1 > ret i16 %.not > } > > The backend then turns this into the following totally suboptimal code: > > cmpge32_0: > mov r13, r12 > inv r12 > swpb r12 > mov.b r12, r12 > clrc > rrc r12 > rra r12 > rra r12 > rra r12 > rra r12 > rra r12 > rra r12 > ret > .Lfunc_end0: > .size cmpge32_0, .Lfunc_end0-cmpge32_0 > > > The cause of this anomaly is again the presence of the Shift instruction (%a.lobit = lshr i32 %a, 31) at the IR level, wh...

On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 11:52 AM Joan Lluch <joan.lluch at icloud.com> wrote: > > Hi Roman, > > Is "test" actually an implementation of a 64-bit-wide multiplication > compiler-rt builtin? > Then i'd think the main problem is that it is being optimized in the > first place, you could end up with endless recursion… > > > No, this is not a compiler-rt

On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 12:26 PM Joan Lluch via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi All, > > In relation to the subject of this message I got my first round of patches successfully reviewed and committed. As a matter of reference, they are the following: > > https://reviews.llvm.org/D69116 > https://reviews.llvm.org/D69120 >

...>> %.not = xor i16 %0, 1 >> ret i16 %.not >> } >> >> The backend then turns this into the following totally suboptimal code: >> >> cmpge32_0: >> mov r13, r12 >> inv r12 >> swpb r12 >> mov.b r12, r12 >> clrc >> rrc r12 >> rra r12 >> rra r12 >> rra r12 >> rra r12 >> rra r12 >> rra r12 >> ret >> .Lfunc_end0: >> .size cmpge32_0, .Lfunc_end0-cmpge32_0 >> >> >> The cause of this anomaly is again the presence of the Shift instruction...

...s$$o%gN|#i~^Q@4QfHQKP{DK&MoZ;^N7<kk(ub3P&UF-Efp7 z;q`|-|FbezIYz()g+eh^6h-rhhzM!+$M4fL_>e%+OHe4USFU!7f8?VnUl9{ipH=I& z5#%+A-l~s4s{Y=CsvgpFvcc5WNv|wHNp>nKm3&Uc#bs{}q3^B7q49$$X&Tu$)8dnT z9G}~V6H(g<Yg+g~#}{gh_;~LdXhj1g1Y#Pr(D$Qx#zT^B<i^B+e`%WW7rlP{0k1Dd zp>l12Rh@b$)rRC}rjd8~2<hrN{N^~BLmqt@baOf-1@gDdx}9F5-R2f}oo~$rqXuks z7{PV3Ml{UYfnB2xGVLXRo5y$Xui5>lmhPrdX~E=x?YtB9IteGkX!G8$Sk{xjAqWOa zyt<8|Zo7eat@@Nke>dVkbr<Q?vZ_fGIvqA?iP)#aVVjzO@}6}GNkRk;2!c4{VXyHl z#dHS&=&w*HJ`+XJt!dMy;(`V96s?-xfP(iylt1Y_UQ{F&uBFc_pHfs*#HP>M;+pcs z6P^P^9XG}_d=h&gt...

Hi, I have a problem about graphics. I would like to plot two graphs: a barplot and curve. Here is the code: > barplot(dpois(0:45,20),xlim=c(0,45),names=0:45) > curve(dnorm(x,20,sqrt(20)),from=0,to=45,add=T) Both graphs are drawn in the same figure, however the scale in both graphs dooes not match. For some reason the second plot is shifted to left. I think there is a problem