search for: rollouts

Rich and I have updated the Wiki page "Asterisk rollout tips" with advice on how to plan and implement your Asterisk rollout. This page is based on many discussions on the mailing list, so don't be surprised if your comment or thought is included in the text. Thank you for your input! http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk+rollout+tips Any comments are welcome! /O

What about IAX - SIP or IAX - IAX? ---- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ----- Original Message ----- From: <asterisk-users-request@lists.digium.com> To: <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com> Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2006 5:43 AM Subject: Asterisk-Users Digest, Vol 18, Issue 185 > Send Asterisk-Users mailing list submissions to >

Isn't it ridiculous that Hammer charges an arm and a leg for any work they do. For systems as large as that one, we just setup a seperate one, connect them back to back and run automated script to burn it in. -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com]On Behalf Of William Boehlke Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006

I was wondering what feedback might be offered by the CentOS community on their experiences using Scientific Linux? I'm a long-time Centos user, and am basically happy with CentOS. I understand there are delays getting EL 6 out. We have been long anxious to roll out EL 6 as soon as it's ready, but our time window for rollout is looming and we will need to act. (for business reasons,

Why is using ulaw or alaw an unlikely scenario? I wouldn't use anything but ulaw\alaw. The Bells can compete on price and will if they have to. Where they CAN'T compete is quality. If there were something better than 711, I'd offer that. Well, there is 722, but not many things support it. ---- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ----- Original

Hi all, one of our clients have three branch offices currently connected by ADSL lines. they are using Cisco 827-4V units with the FXS ports connected to their aging PBX units. I am thinking of installing an * server in the head office, maybe with an analogue FXO card connected to the PSTN so field officers in Melbourne can call sydney for a local call price. The question is - what Digium

Hey, all. I've used Samba a lot, but took a job about four years ago during which time I've only used it for one-off projects. Looks like I might take a new job, though, and I'll get to call the shots. I'd *love* to have Samba with AD running things, and just have Windows in-place as clients (possibly with Exchange... can't win 'em all). Is this feasible in this day and

we are running an older version of RH (7.3) - and I am getting concerned that I may need to migrate off of it - but I dont know what I should move to. Trying to formulate ideas before it becomes a 'got to do it now' scenario. I have some reservations about fedora - I just dont know how stable it is for a production server (our services are mainly samba/ldap/ntp/ssh/rsync/clamav) - we

As the OP for this thread, it saddens me to see that the thread I started has now been used as a forum for behavior of the worst kind seen in professional circles. I'm a longtime user of CentOS and merely wanted to know of users' past experiences transitioning between SL and CentOS. My first experience with CentOS was as a transition from Whitebox to CentOS, and the process was as

Hi guys I was just wondering if there's already a way to automate the process of updating Windows to be specific XP. My idea is to mimic how a Windows server domain controller can rollout critical update on the entire domain. Can Samba do this? Thanks for any info Jan Ardosa --------------------------------- Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping" your friends

>> You don't have smbd/smbstatus installed from a package in /usr/ and the >> other left over in /usr/local/, or similar? In that case, they could >> be getting their configurations from different places... >> >> peace & happiness, >> martin > Hi Martin, > > No, nothing like that. Installing the Sernet packages obsoletes the > distro ones.

Staging for a rollout of EL 6, and ran into a very strange permissions issue with xinetd that defies all (my) logic. It's a script called "spfiled" that we use for messaging between our server cluster servers. I'm trying to get it to run with "least permissions necessary". Because it reads/writes files in conjunction with a web-based service, it runs as user

Hi, we are currently considering different options for rolling out a large scale IP PBX to handle around 3,000 + concurrent calls. Can this be done with Asterisk? Has it been done before? I really would like an input on this. Thanks! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi All, Just a word of caution for those who are intending to roll out XP SP2 via a network share. I've encoutered an issue with SP2 and Debian Samba 3.07 when more than 5 simultaneous connections are in place. I'd set-up and tested a rollout using the samba share, but come roll-out day most of the 20 odd machines were still copying files some 48 hours after. No specific errors were

Say for example wordpress.com uses puppet to rollout the wordpress software for its customers. During updates to the software, say there are mysql schema updates. i.e. say they have 100K mysql databases, 1 for each blog. And the database for each blog as to be updated to version x which adds a few tables, columns to tables etc. If they have 100K wordpress installations spanning hundreds of

I am in the middle of rolling RHEL 4 update 5 ( 2.6.9-55) through my servers. We use a development, QA, and production rollout. Unfortunately I have ocfs members in each of these groups that need to share filesystems. The network compatibility issues between ocfs2 tools 1.2.4 and 1.2.5 are causing the members to not be able to operate with ocfs. Hence this breaks my systems or causes me to

I'm using Dovecot 2.2.18, compiled from source, on CentOS 6. I'm running into a permissions problem with my first rollout of Dovecot which has to do with directory permissions: Oct 23 14:34:51 mail dovecot: imap(username): Error: stat(/home/username/Maildir/tmp) failed: Permission denied (euid=596(<unknown>) egid=97(dovecot) missing +x perm: /home/username/Maildir, dir owned by

I''m getting this problem on all the puppet client''s I''ve been setting up and it''s got me both scratching my head (because I''m not seeing anything obvious in any system logs) and pausing in my rollout until I get it solved: # puppet resource service puppet ensure=running enable=true Error: Could not start Service[puppet]: Execution of

Hi all, I've dug through the lists and google, but haven't found very much info on using Citrix with a samba PDC. The small number of messages and information I've found, lead me to believe it will work. Does anyone have any first hand knowledge they'd be willing to share? I'm currently involved in rolling out Citrix for proprietary windows apps for remote offices.

We are gradually rolling out Dovecot (IMAP only, no POP3) to our customer base. We are replicating between a pair of CentOS 7 boxes. All has been working wonderfully. However, to be sure our rollout continues to go smoothly, we put together a simple benchmark client program to fire up X persistent IMAP connections (using hundreds of mailboxes) that login, list the folders, select the