search for: rofls

On 05/07/16 20:49, Alex Crow wrote: > FYI, by "it did, completely" I meant it failed completely. > > Even if the only file we have to have on the cluster FS (which now > seems to be down solely to the ctdb lock file), I'm still worried what > these failures mean: > > 1) does the -rw (without -m) test suggest any problems with the > MooseFS FS I'm

Hai Rowland, Yes, that correct. If you use this in override.conf then its. ( so not a copy of the service file to /etc/systemd ) systemctl edit rpc-gssd.service [Service] ExecStart= ExecStart=/Your/Own/Script/script.sh Note the empty line, without that won the override is NOT working. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Rowland Penny [mailto:rpenny at

On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 13:37:18 -0300 > francis picabia <fpicabia at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > getent passwd username > > > > (or "theusername") is not the literal command. I substitute > > 'username' here to protect the user id.

On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 14:49:37 -0300 francis picabia <fpicabia at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Rowland Penny via samba < > samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 13:37:18 -0300 > > francis picabia <fpicabia at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > getent passwd username > > > >

hi all! can''t open github (http://github.com/why/camping/tree/master) What''s going on? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/camping-list/attachments/20090817/bba31d63/attachment.html>

On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 3:00 PM, Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 14:49:37 -0300 > francis picabia <fpicabia at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Rowland Penny via samba < > > samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 13:37:18 -0300 > > > francis

On 05/07/16 21:16, Alex Crow wrote: > > > On 05/07/16 21:00, Rowland penny wrote: >> On 05/07/16 20:49, Alex Crow wrote: >>> FYI, by "it did, completely" I meant it failed completely. >>> >>> Even if the only file we have to have on the cluster FS (which now >>> seems to be down solely to the ctdb lock file), I'm still worried

Hai, It's not totaly correct, In this case the shell script is called to set variables a user did set in /etc/default/file. Not execute the program. This is the exec of the program. (example) ExecStart=/usr/sbin/rpc.gssd $GSSDARGS And yes, you set varariables and other things also in systemd. Thats in debian Buster even more and more. They are having problems with dropping

On 05/07/16 21:00, Rowland penny wrote: > On 05/07/16 20:49, Alex Crow wrote: >> FYI, by "it did, completely" I meant it failed completely. >> >> Even if the only file we have to have on the cluster FS (which now >> seems to be down solely to the ctdb lock file), I'm still worried >> what these failures mean: >> >> 1) does the -rw

Well, here is my plan of action. I will migrate the VMs on the secondary server to the primary one. Then I will zero the RAID10 array, install the latest XenServer, and load a Gentoo VM to build the needed binary packages. I can then create a new DC, promote it to the primary server, move the Windows VMs back to the secondary server, and then wipe and reload the primary box. This way I have an

May be a little bit off topic, but this gave me hard laugh: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/09/24/sysadmin_file_tools/ Windows admins use a virtualized CentOS machine to copy files because their own tools are not able to handle copying a bigger amount of data. :) Cheers, Timo

Progress... On 08/27/2015 08:50 AM, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: > After reading this thread.. and ..seeing the comments.. > > I googled a bit around. and yes.. more then 5 sec.. ;-) > > I wonder why almost every "centos/redhat/rpm based" howto removes firewalld with the base iptables service > now, i'm not "pro" systemd or con systemd, i use it but i set my

Now with firewalld, opening up ports is now 'better' done by opening services. So what do I need, for starters it seems: dns, dhcp, dhcpv6, samba, kerberos Here is the list of services: RH-Satellite-6 amanda-client bacula bacula-client dhcp dhcpv6 dhcpv6-client dns ftp high-availability http https imaps ipp ipp-client ipsec kerberos kpasswd ldap ldaps libvirt libvirt-tls mdns mountd

Ok, so if i understand right, your sysvol is on a shared folder which is a debian squeeze server. i think you problem is that the needed acl cant be set on the queeze server. and why not systemd, since gentoo also does systemd https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Systemd and if you really want, just run your install with preseed/late_command="in-target apt-get install -y sysvinit-core"

On 12/06/15 15:54, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: > Ok, so if i understand right, > your sysvol is on a shared folder which is a debian squeeze server. > i think you problem is that the needed acl cant be set on the queeze server. You are probably right Louis. > > and why not systemd, since gentoo also does systemd > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Systemd Ah but Gentoo only does

On 27/08/15 13:50, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: > After reading this thread.. and ..seeing the comments.. > > I googled a bit around. and yes.. more then 5 sec.. ;-) > > I wonder why almost every "centos/redhat/rpm based" howto removes firewalld with the base iptables service Now here's a funny thing, I was searching the samba wiki for 'firewall' and found there

On 30/06/15 17:18, Ryan Ashley wrote: > I hate to revive this, but before I push my client through an upgrade, I > have to be sure my issue is with ACLs not being supported, as suggested. > Squeeze does have ACL support. > > root at dc01:/samba/var/locks# getfacl sysvol > # file: sysvol > # owner: root > # group: 3000000 > user::rwx > user:root:rwx >

I hate to revive this, but before I push my client through an upgrade, I have to be sure my issue is with ACLs not being supported, as suggested. Squeeze does have ACL support. root at dc01:/samba/var/locks# getfacl sysvol # file: sysvol # owner: root # group: 3000000 user::rwx user:root:rwx user:3000000:rwx user:3000001:r-x user:3000002:rwx user:3000003:r-x group::rwx group:3000000:rwx

Oh, this really helps. See below, though. On 08/27/2015 09:33 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 27/08/15 14:25, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> Progress... >> >> On 08/27/2015 08:50 AM, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: >>> After reading this thread.. and ..seeing the comments.. >>> >>> I googled a bit around. and yes.. more then 5 sec.. ;-) >>>

Hello, I am doing some testing on a PXA270 based processor (on a single board computer) which makes the processor vulnerable to bit flips. One such bit flips seems to have corrupted the file system. The debug port on the board (it is a single board computer) had the following message when i think the FS corruption occured : <7>init_special_inode: bogus i_mode (33061) init_special_inode: