search for: roaches

On Nov 18, 2015, at 1:01 PM, John R Pierce <pierce at hogranch.com> wrote: > > On 11/18/2015 11:55 AM, Warren Young wrote: >> It?s rather annoying to buy a NAS, then later realize you need to buy*another* NAS as a mirror in case the first one roaches itself. Isn?t that what redundant storage is supposed to avoid? > > > no, RAID is purely availability when faced with single or double drive failure, nothing else. classic raid is most certainly NOT about data integrity, as the raid stripes aren't checksummed, they assume hardware...

I'm curious about how one would go about contacting/hiring a samba developer to fix a bug, or implement a feature. I've got a particular bug in mind (1493), but it seems like it would be a good thing to know in general. Thanks, Mark Roach

...d several $300-500 NASes become unmountable for one reason or another, and the vendor was no use *at all* in getting it remounted. I had to rebuild the NAS from backups each time. It?s rather annoying to buy a NAS, then later realize you need to buy *another* NAS as a mirror in case the first one roaches itself. Isn?t that what redundant storage is supposed to avoid? Meanwhile, I?ve never had a ZFS pool become unmountable, even when the disk enclosure hardware was failing underneath it. > Then, early this year, we had a node fail, and it took them almost a > month to get us a replacement....

...you know, indirectly, >> when your copy and pasting messed up the tag pairing. > > Yeah, well, I've tried word processors, and, years back, I tried Quanta, > which was specifically for working on web pages, and the HTML generated by > all word processors sucks dead Mar-a-Lago roaches. And *all* of them want > to left-justify, even if there's an option not to, and you set that, > rather than leaving it properly indented. > The forced left justify part reminds me of a conversation I had with a vendor last year. It was something on the lines of "I know this...

Hi, Well, I've just set up Samba + goodies to get my Red Hat (lisa) and WinME (homer) boxes connected and it all seems to be going rather well...except for one thing. I'm not even sure if this is supposed to happen but here's the deal. First up, my smb.conf file... ------------------------------------------------------------------- [global] domain logons = yes encrypt passwords =

...wrote: > On Nov 18, 2015, at 1:01 PM, John R Pierce <pierce at hogranch.com> wrote: >> >> On 11/18/2015 11:55 AM, Warren Young wrote: >>> It?s rather annoying to buy a NAS, then later realize you need to >>> buy*another* NAS as a mirror in case the first one roaches itself. >>> Isn?t that what redundant storage is supposed to avoid? >> >> no, RAID is purely availability when faced with single or double drive >> failure, nothing else. classic raid is most certainly NOT about data >> integrity, as the raid stripes aren't ch...

On Tue, April 11, 2017 4:41 pm, Warren Young wrote: > On Apr 11, 2017, at 11:28 AM, Scott Robbins <scottro11 at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> (though they're talking of trying OpenRC) > > Not just talking. TrueOS, ne?? PC-BSD, now runs on OpenRC. > > So let me tell you about how my recent TrueOS server upgrade broke > virtually all of my services on the TrueOS

This question is perhaps one you have seen before but I have not found an answer to as yet. Rsync uses cygwin1.dll as does openssh. Is there a more current compilation of openssh that uses a more current cygwin1.dll such that both rsync and openssh can function on the same version? This is important because of improvements made to cygwin1 that affect rsync speed. Thanks for your thoughts and

System: i5-750 intel processor Lost of storage Debian Linux OS (Squeeze) KDE Desktop Using wine 1.1.42 (at least that is what is returned with --version switch) When running winecfg I get: No protocol specified No protocol specified No protocol specified No protocol specified No protocol specified No protocol specified No protocol specified Application tried to create a

I'm trying to set up a full server backup using rsync 3.0.6. I'm using --fake-super, and SSH keys to access a remote server as a normal user. My problem is that there is a local directory that has permissions 0111 ("d--x--x--x"), and rsync throws an error trying to set the xattr: rsync: failed to read xattr user.rsync.%stat for "/roach/backup/root/tcb/lib":

I am testing samba 3.0's net rpc vampire tool and am getting strange results... after I import the account info, the samba usernames seem to be mapping to hardcoded unix uid #'s instead of account names. For example: # pdbedit -u jah000 idmap uid range missing or invalid idmap will be unable to map foreign SIDs idmap gid range missing or invalid idmap will be unable to map foreign SIDs

On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 12:11:19PM -0400, Jonathan Billings wrote: > I feel like this conversation has reached the "lets just keep > repeating FUD about systemd" stage and probably won't progress in a > useful direction. > > Maybe we should just jump right to the end that we always have each > time this comes up. systemd is the death of linux and you're

I have been searching for info on this and haven't found an authoritative answer. From what I have read, oplocks are good because they increase connection speeds, but they are bad because they don't really work, but they actually do work, but they only work in some cases, etc etc. so, here's my problem and my question together: I get tons of these messages every day (over a thousand a

Don''t let the bureaucratic aspects of this RFP bother you: we''re eager to find and work with a good trainer to get our developers up to speed on RoR, and there''s a possibility of a paid Rails-evangelist gig as well. If that sounds like something you would be interested in and qualified for, I hope you will get in touch with us and submit a proposal. --Chris

On 04/12/2017 02:08 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > d) And then there stuff that I'm not sure of the purpose... like eclipse, > that > needs 2GB to run... for an editor. > > mark "my web pages proudly built in vi!" And mine on medon.htt-consult.com done with Geany. Using a editor that understands html tags so you can collapse ones not being edited

I have been trying to get wine up and running for some time. I work with the Debian Linux system with a KDE Desktop. Debian is supplying version 1.0.1 . I just installed the .deb file from the Wine website which is version 1.1.24. That is the highest version available for the Debian system. All of the versions that I have tried have the same thing wrong with the graphic interface. I will use

Hi, By running some scripts on our target system for a while, I lost all means of access to the system. It seems that the kernel is crashed with the following error message: Assertion failure in do_get_write_access() at transaction.c:731: "(((jh2bh(jh))->b_state & (1UL << BH_Uptodate)) != 0)" Oops: Exception in kernel mode, sig: 4 We are currently running Linux version

Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 01:05:15PM -0500, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> >> Why? Fedora is a development, rapid change distro. I just bugged one >> of >> > Because of the context of this conversation. We can't have user >> > feedback and involvement without user feedback and involvement. >> So, you're saying that end users

On 11/18/2015 11:55 AM, Warren Young wrote: > It?s rather annoying to buy a NAS, then later realize you need to buy*another* NAS as a mirror in case the first one roaches itself. Isn?t that what redundant storage is supposed to avoid? no, RAID is purely availability when faced with single or double drive failure, nothing else. classic raid is most certainly NOT about data integrity, as the raid stripes aren't checksummed, they assume hardware data integr...

On Apr 11, 2017, at 11:28 AM, Scott Robbins <scottro11 at gmail.com> wrote: > > (though they're talking of trying OpenRC) Not just talking. TrueOS, ne? PC-BSD, now runs on OpenRC. So let me tell you about how my recent TrueOS server upgrade broke virtually all of my services on the TrueOS server, roached the X configuration, and now has the system in an un-upgradeable state, to