search for: rml

Patches against 2.4.10-pre4 and 2.4.9-ac9 are at http://www.uow.edu.au/~andrewm/linux/ext3/ It's a fairly large change. The most significant parts are * the inclusion of Stephen's error-handling work, which is designed to remount the fs read-only in the presence of software and hardware errors, rather than forcing a panic. * Stephen's fix for the journal_revoke assertion

During my tests I''m starting to feel stupid :). Traffic shaping works quite on its own. System: RedHat 7.3, RedHat kernel 2.4.18-18.7.xsmp, HTB version 3.6, interfaces eth0 and eth1 are acting as bridge br0. If TCP shaping almost works, it just exceeds limits UDP is not shaped. Traffic flows PC=>eth0=>eth1=>PC. Statistics shown is for just UDP traffic (1mbit of small udp

greetings, trying to install netapplet (http://primates.ximian.com/~rml/netapplet/) from source on a centos 4 laptop. ./configure, make and make install all work fine, but when I then go to /etc/init.d to start netdaemon, it complains that it cannot find checkproc. I can't seem to even find anything on google for redhat or RHEL and checkproc or killproc. The...

Hi, I note that dovecot supported inotify from -test77, and now the Linux kernel supports it starting from linux-2.6.13-rc3. So in theory I should be set to go. I'm using an -mm kernel, and it was built with inotify, on FC4/devel. However when trying to build with it using --with-notify=inotify, I always seem to be getting this message: checking for poll... yes configure: error:

Which version should I use out of the list? Or do I install all of them, one after the other? ext3-2.4-0.9.9-2410p4.gz 05Sep01 (Against 2.4.10-pre4) (Changelog) ext3-2.4-0.9.9-249ac9.gz 05Sep01 (Against 2.4.9-ac9) ext3-2.4-0.9.10-2410.gz 23Sep01 (Against 2.4.10) (Changelog) patch-rml-2.4.10-ac3-ext3-0.9.9-with-dir-speedup-1.gz 01Oct01 (From Robert Love. Unofficial :-)) ext3-2.4-0.9.12-2410ac11.gz 10Oct01 (Against 2.4.10-ac11) (Changelog) ext3-2.4-0.9.13-2413p6.gz 21Oct01 (Against 2.4.13-pre6) (Changelog) ext3-2.4-0.9.13-2413.gz 25Oct01 (Against 2.4.13) (Changelog) ex...

Which version should I use out of the list? Or do I install all of them, one after the other? ext3-2.4-0.9.9-2410p4.gz 05Sep01 (Against 2.4.10-pre4) (Changelog) ext3-2.4-0.9.9-249ac9.gz 05Sep01 (Against 2.4.9-ac9) ext3-2.4-0.9.10-2410.gz 23Sep01 (Against 2.4.10) (Changelog) patch-rml-2.4.10-ac3-ext3-0.9.9-with-dir-speedup-1.gz 01Oct01 (From Robert Love. Unofficial :-)) ext3-2.4-0.9.12-2410ac11.gz 10Oct01 (Against 2.4.10-ac11) (Changelog) ext3-2.4-0.9.13-2413p6.gz 21Oct01 (Against 2.4.13-pre6) (Changelog) ext3-2.4-0.9.13-2413.gz 25Oct01 (Against 2.4.13) (Changelog) ex...

Hi, Just reporting our findings from a little problem a colleague and I discovered with the autoconf rules. Platform AIX-4.3.3, any RML OpenSSH versions: all from the latest release back to 3.4, identical symptoms for each version. This includes the Bull releases and building from the tarballs. I'm not sure exactly where between 3.0 and 3.4 it was introduced but the rest of the facts should speak for themselves. Symptom: Co...

Hi, I'm trying to compile Dovecot beta2 with inotify support, but this is unsuccessfull. First, it seems that the configure script is looking for inotify.h in /usr/include/sys, whereas it is in /usr/include/linux on my Debian Sarge system. But that's a minor point, let's make a symlink. % dpkg -S /usr/include/linux/inotify.h linux-kernel-headers: /usr/include/linux/inotify.h % dpkg

x <- read.table("LittleGarvin.csv", sep=",", header=TRUE) y <- t(x) str(y) chr [1:193, 1:288] "oligocha" "0" " 0" " 0" " 0" "0" ... - attr(*, "dimnames")=List of 2 ..$ : chr [1:193] "X" "upwd1201" "upwd0502" "upwd0702" ... ..$ : NULL x is a data frame with

...- than S-PLUS on this problem. It looks curious to me when I run system.time() on this that timing vector shows almost no user time but a huge amount of system time. R> system.time(assign("fm2", + lme(MathAch ~ MEANSES*CSES + Sector + CSES:Sector, ttt, ~ CSES | School, + RML = TRUE ))) iteration = 0 Step: [1] 0 0 0 Parameter: [1] 2.61400 0.16608 3.88195 Function Value [1] 44964 Gradient: [1] -0.014379 -0.143176 -0.646558 iteration = 1 Step: [1] 0.002888 0.028756 0.129857 Parameter: [1] 2.61688 0.19483 4.01181 Function Value [1] 44964 Gradient: [1] -0...

I sent this report sometime ago to l-k and to the preempt-patch maintainer, but omitted to send a copy here, where some people could have clues about the problem - so here it is: ----- Forwarded message ----- To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Robert Love <rml@tech9.net> Subject: oops with 2.4.18 and preempt patch, on SMP + ext3 machine Coming back home tonight, I found my machine in a bad state, as shown by the attached kern.log extract (including last usual message and all lines until reboot). I had left the machine under "vlock -a", and...

...6222004 INTL 20090903) (XEN) ACPI: SSDT BEEC9C18, 002B (r2 INTEL PtidDevc 1000 INTL 20100331) (XEN) ACPI: BOOT BEEC9B98, 0028 (r1 INTEL ROMLEY 6222004 INTL 20090903) (XEN) ACPI: SSDT BEE70018, 3CFC4 (r2 INTEL CpuPm 4000 INTL 20100331) (XEN) ACPI: DMAR BEEC7798, 0130 (r1 INTEL RML 1 INTL 1) (XEN) System RAM: 32731MB (33517028kB) (XEN) SRAT: PXM 0 -> APIC 0 -> Node 0 (XEN) SRAT: PXM 0 -> APIC 1 -> Node 0 (XEN) SRAT: PXM 0 -> APIC 2 -> Node 0 (XEN) SRAT: PXM 0 -> APIC 3 -> Node 0 (XEN) SRAT: PXM 0 -> APIC 4 -> Node 0 (XEN) SRAT: PXM...

This is only my second email to the rsync mailing list. My first was sent under the title "Re: TODO hardlink performance optimizations" on Jan 3, 2004. The response of the rsync developers to that email was remarkable (in my opinion). I felt that the rsync performance enhancements that resulted from the ensuing discussion and code improvements were so consequential that I dared not