Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "rl289280".
Did you mean:
r289280
2017 May 11
2
RFC: A new llvm-dlltool driver and llvm-lib driver improvements
...hu, May 11, 2017 at 3:00 AM, Martell Malone <martellmalone at gmail.com>
wrote:
> There are a few things running in parallel and thanks for taking the time
> to review and help me get this in tree.
> I wanted to follow up with a question on the linker side of things.
>
> Since rL289280 I can no longer link programs with the mingw-crt because of
> dup function errors of the main function.
>
> In mingw-w64-crt/crt/crtexe.c a main function is called
> from __tmainCRTStartup
> mingw-w64-crt/crt/crt0_c.c defines this main and calls WinMain in the case
> where main do...
2017 May 21
2
RFC: A new llvm-dlltool driver and llvm-lib driver improvements
...the custom frontend I have for using lld so it
> wouldn't be much use to do that.
> I'm looking to get all the other components merged before I submit an in
> process shim like Rui suggested.
>
> I think the best way to approach this would be from MSVC terms.
>
> Before rL289280 we had some sort of priority for deciding on which symbol
> to link.
>
> MSVC Link.exe defines a flag called /FORCE https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-
> us/library/70abkas3.aspx
> We currently implement /FORCE:UNRESOLVED from what I see in the driver.
> I would need /FORCE:MULTIPLE to...
2016 Dec 12
0
LLVM Weekly - #154, Dec 12th 2016
...* The libc++ test infrastructure was updated to support modules. This makes
use of the recently added custom parser functionality in lit.
[r288728](http://reviews.llvm.org/rL288728).
* The ELF linker symbol table design has been ported to the COFF linker in
LLD. [r289280](http://reviews.llvm.org/rL289280).