search for: rl289280

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "rl289280".

Did you mean: r289280
2017 May 11
2
RFC: A new llvm-dlltool driver and llvm-lib driver improvements
...hu, May 11, 2017 at 3:00 AM, Martell Malone <martellmalone at gmail.com> wrote: > There are a few things running in parallel and thanks for taking the time > to review and help me get this in tree. > I wanted to follow up with a question on the linker side of things. > > Since rL289280 I can no longer link programs with the mingw-crt because of > dup function errors of the main function. > > In mingw-w64-crt/crt/crtexe.c a main function is called > from __tmainCRTStartup > mingw-w64-crt/crt/crt0_c.c defines this main and calls WinMain in the case > where main do...
2017 May 21
2
RFC: A new llvm-dlltool driver and llvm-lib driver improvements
...the custom frontend I have for using lld so it > wouldn't be much use to do that. > I'm looking to get all the other components merged before I submit an in > process shim like Rui suggested. > > I think the best way to approach this would be from MSVC terms. > > Before rL289280 we had some sort of priority for deciding on which symbol > to link. > > MSVC Link.exe defines a flag called /FORCE https://msdn.microsoft.com/en- > us/library/70abkas3.aspx > We currently implement /FORCE:UNRESOLVED from what I see in the driver. > I would need /FORCE:MULTIPLE to...
2016 Dec 12
0
LLVM Weekly - #154, Dec 12th 2016
...* The libc++ test infrastructure was updated to support modules. This makes use of the recently added custom parser functionality in lit. [r288728](http://reviews.llvm.org/rL288728). * The ELF linker symbol table design has been ported to the COFF linker in LLD. [r289280](http://reviews.llvm.org/rL289280).