search for: r289280

Hi Martell, r289280 was not intended to be a significant functional change in the sense that it would cause programs to fail to link, so this may be a bug I introduced in r289280 (or one of the followup patches, which also changed link order). How is crt0_c.c being added to the link? If crt0_c.c is supplying a defini...

Would it be possible to share a repro.tar file created with /linkrepro so that we can reproduce the problem? Peter On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:00 AM, Martell Malone <martellmalone at gmail.com> wrote: > There are a few things running in parallel and thanks for taking the time > to review and help me get this in tree. > I wanted to follow up with a question on the linker side of

...ttp://reviews.llvm.org/rL288775). * The libc++ test infrastructure was updated to support modules. This makes use of the recently added custom parser functionality in lit. [r288728](http://reviews.llvm.org/rL288728). * The ELF linker symbol table design has been ported to the COFF linker in LLD. [r289280](http://reviews.llvm.org/rL289280).