search for: rigorously

Hi, does anyone out there have a recommendation for multilevel / random effects and longitudinal analysis? My dream book would be something that's both accessible to a non-statistician but rigorous (because I seem to be slowly turning into a statistician) and ideally would use R. Peter

> You have several hundred more Critical or Important security updates > outstanding. If that box touches the Internet in any way, it is likely > compromised. Just in the last 6 months there are 21 Important or > Critical updates. That is an important qualifier: *If* that box touches the Internet in any way. Although one might add that attacks on the LAN can be nastier since there

I am trying to get a measure of how R compares in usage as a statistical platform compared to other software. I would guess it is the most widely used among statisticians at least by virtue of it being open source. But is there any study to which I can refer? By asking this list I am not exactly adopting a rigorous approach! Best wishes John John Logsdon

This is among the things we need to do when a user leaves, and it's a larger question than it sounds. Our Office has many servers, with a good number of fileservers for projects, with large filesystems (i.e. 10's of TB). Can anyone think of a way *other* than running what's probably a many-hour long find / -user on all our systems, which is really intensive, to find all the files own

I am not in favor of the change, which is a choice of rigor over usability. When I am developing code or functions I agree with this, and I view any warnings from R CMD check about shortened arguments as positive feedback. But 90% of my usage of R is day to day data analysis, interactive, at the keyboard. A lot of data sets that come to me have long variable names. What this change will mean

Buenas tardes: Aprovechando la vena lingüística que estamos demostrando tener últimamente, y en consonancia con labores de documentación que me ocupan en estos días, quiero consultaros acerca de cómo definir a R. Yo lo definiría como entorno más que como sistema estadístico, pero ¿realmente qué es lo más correcto si buscamos el rigor?. Gracias. Atte.- Eva [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Dear R gurus, I have some climatic data for a region of the world. They are monthly averages 1950 -2000 of precipitation (12 months), minimum temperature (12 months), maximum temperature (12 months). I have scaled them to 2 km x 2km cells, and I have around 75,000 cells. I need to feed them into a statistical model as co-variates, to use them to predict a response variable. The climatic

Hi- I'm almost embarrassed to ask the following simple question, following John's excellent and rigorous bandwidth analysis (see earlier thread): I have a straightforward Asterisk application, IVR-only (no connections between channels). It will simply decode DTMF's and speak prompts (probably A-Law encoded) on a number of E1 circuits simultaneously. Realistically, how many

I see that there are several options to influence instruction scheduling, but there doesn't seem to be a lot of information about what they do, for example: -misched-topdown -misched-bottomup The description in MachineScheduler.cpp says: "Force top-down list scheduling" and "Force bottom-up list scheduling" Which isn't too helpful - where might I want to use these?

Hi All, I've just rebuild the latest R with the Goto BLAS on our new Intel quad core machines. I did a few basic matrix calculations, and I was very impressed by the performance I saw. I wonder if anyone has a more rigorous benchmarking program for R. I downloaded a old R test/benchmarking program (see below), and this didn't work with the current R, and so I wondered if anyone could

Hello - I have 8 polycom 501s all setup great using ulaw. We have put them through a pretty rigorous torture over the last 4 months, and they've performed famously. No dropped calls ever. We invested in some g729 licenses. changed my ipmid.cfg so that g729 is priority 1 and ulaw is priority 2. I added allow=g729 to my extension's sip.conf entry, where existed before disallow=all

...check would be appreciated, but it may be a bit of work to get all of LLVM to adhere to it. -- adrian > On Oct 4, 2020, at 10:11 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > +Aprantl for debug info IR metadata verifier things > > I don't think the verifier's rigorously comprehensive - so probably somewhere between "intended/acceptable" and "a bug". > > Not sure what the consequences might be. > > On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 10:03 PM Xun Li via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:...

hi all - i'm having some difficulty figuring out how to convert between "user units" (which i can't find a definition for in the plotrix package) and either (a) device units (e.g. inches with PDFs) or (b) user coordinates along any particular axis. as an example, suppose i set up a PDF device with inches, the device has both outer and inner magins, and the plot region has

Hello, What types of tests does the CentOS Development Team do for software in its repositories? Where does it get its test catalog from? I want to create a testing process which is equal to if not more rigorous that the CentOS process for any third party software we use. For example, if I install the php-mysqlnd package from the Remi repository, I want to test it just as carefully as the

Hi, I'm an R nooob! So please pardon this easy question! I have two data frames that share a common column, data1.name and data2.name. How would I be able to order the other based on an integer column from either data frame? For example, how do I order data2 based on data1.age? Or data1 based on data2.salary? Thanks! Paul -- Paul Rigor Pre-doctoral BIT Fellow and Graduate Student

Hi, I am trying to see if I can use R to perform more rigorous regression analysis. I wonder if the fingerprint package is able to handle pipeline pilot fingerprints (ECFC6 etc) now. Thank you, Eric [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

On 31 August 2007, Phil Schaffner <Philip.R.Schaffner at NASA.gov> wrote: > > Message: 21 > <snip> > > As discussed recently on-list, VMware CPU requirements to support > > virtualization are not nearly so rigorous as for Xen. You are > > probably OK with VMware on most any relatively modern x86 or x86_64 > > CPU. > >

...2.2.5 via the terminal from within the Gnome GUI. I can get Samba to work when it comes to Windows clients using the Linux box as a file server but am having no joy when I attempt to use the smbpasswd command to join an NT domain. I keep receiving the message - smbpasswd:command not found. I have rigorously followed the instructions that came with Samba regarding it's installation and still I get this message. Can anyone out there shed some light on this problem for me? Many thanks, Tom -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed

On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 10:33 PM, Adam Sampson <ats at offog.org> wrote: > Carsten Mattner <carstenmattner at gmail.com> writes: > >> What are my best options for a portable player I can put opus on and >> have 10 hours of opus playback? > > I use a SanDisk Clip+ running Rockbox; these are available for around > ?25 refurbished. They get about 14h playing

On Monday 21 February 2005 12:46 pm, Mike Hearn wrote: > On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 19:42:34 -0500, Adam Treat wrote: > > The result is that we are >' '< close to having Qt4 both compile *and* > > link with the LLVM toolchain. > > Wow, cool! Mind if I ask what is motivating this work? Essentially, I am very interested in LLVM and want it to work with Qt4 as well as