search for: rife

...'t match the docs. For example, in Wx::ListCtrl: - The doc makes no mention of on_get_item_column_image(), but without this method I get NoMethodError. - The doc says on_get_item_attr() *may* be overloaded, but if I don''t define it, I get NoMethodError. The API doc appears to be rife with inconsistencies like this. Is anyone working on updating it? Sorry to whine, but newbies like me need all the hand-holding we can get! Also, the Wx::Sizer page has a broken link to "Sizer overview". Oh how I need that overview -- I don''t have any idea how layouts work in GU...

Hi, during a reverse engineering challenge I used clang/llvm optimizations to minimiz some code and I found some strange behavior that I can't reproduce with GCC or CL (visual studio compiler). The C code function contains some code that operates on a data array and an supplied password from ARGV. The compiled binary works as long as I don't activate any optimizations. When I activate

...net/ PGP public key available on web site. ~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlUVW/0ACgkQVKC1jlbQAQeKNQCgkZF+PmmIgXUCrFWGRIBgTNI0 WTIAoNfGiD91ubrz/StpXNmMxZ86gzZe =RIfE -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

I''m getting the following errors multiple times per request when using 4.3.0. I do not receive any errors when using 4.2.1. Please CC me on replies, I''m not subscribed to the mailing list. 16:48:42 web.1 | E, [2012-04-26T16:48:42.733954 #87940] ERROR -- : app error: Socket is not connected (Errno::ENOTCONN) 16:48:42 web.1 | E, [2012-04-26T16:48:42.734193 #87940] ERROR

I''m expermienting with Shorewall for use protecting my servers(about 25 all currently using pub addresses). My pointy-haired-boss is somewhat sceptical about adding a firewall that would be a single point of failier for our services. Does anyone have a good set of documentation that I could use in setting up either an Active/Active or Active/passive setup with two identical shorewall

Mail has always been the bane of my sys-admin life. I've been looking long and hard for a small, C-based, simple IMAP server that worked well with maildirs *and* mboxes and nothing else. wu-imap is so bloated and rife with decrepit, cross-platform, insecure code that I avoid it for any new servers. Courier-imap only supports maildirs but has some wierdnesses that I've come to live with. dovecot promises to be exactly what I'm looking for with just the right footprint and feature-set. =) I was surprised...

..., we''ve been trying to get a nice stable config running for deployment with SwitchTower, spinner spawner and reaper, and I have to say, they are, as it says in the title, teh suxx0r. <warning>I''m annoyed, and wrote this while annoyed</warning> ;) The problems are rife: 1. Because lighttpd has no control over the fcgis, the restart process is delicate. Lighty frequently cannot "see" new fcgis. 2. Reaper does not successfully kill all dispatch.fcgi processes in a horrifyingly large percentage of calls 3. SwitchTower frequently hangs on the last task...

...quot; and completely avoid paying to use the resulting format. So even if you're not looking to make a profit from your participation, you'll be sure to get some patents into the result so that you don't have to _pay_ for the result of your own labors. As a result these formats end up rife with inconsequential or even detrimental patented techniques which could have _easily_ been avoided, as essential elements. ?? and this is the outcome when all of the parties are playing by the rules. For an in-depth analysis of the mess that patents are making of standardization, see: http://pape...

I''d like to see if we can use DTrace to as the kernel implementation of the BSD systrace security policy system (http://www.systrace.org). I don''t really want to port systrace to Solaris because I think with DTrace we already have all the necessary in kernel hooks to do this. With systrace you express things like: "httpd can bind to port 80 but not any other port, it

...web site. > ~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~ > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2 > > iEYEARECAAYFAlUVW/0ACgkQVKC1jlbQAQeKNQCgkZF+PmmIgXUCrFWGRIBgTNI0 > WTIAoNfGiD91ubrz/StpXNmMxZ86gzZe > =RIfE > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > -- > Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. > To unsubscribe or change options: > https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync > Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html > -----...

...urns 0 on success, BSD returns the new nice value), and there's no real point in checking for success or failure: nice() with positive values is supposed to work for everybody anyway. It might be possible to support *raising* CPU priority (via a negative nice), but this seems like an area rife with trouble for no real benefit. We'd have to coordinate lowering the nice before giving up root permissions, check for errors, probably get it wrong sometimes, and it seems so much easier to allow only the behavior which the patch intended to add anyway: lower the priority. The only th...

...*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~ >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Version: GnuPG v2 >> >> iEYEARECAAYFAlUVW/0ACgkQVKC1jlbQAQeKNQCgkZF+PmmIgXUCrFWGRIBgTNI0 >> WTIAoNfGiD91ubrz/StpXNmMxZ86gzZe >> =RIfE >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> -- >> Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. >> To unsubscribe or change options: >> https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync >> Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-q...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Try also removing --delete-excluded. Without those two options there should be no reason for rsync to require gigs of RAM. Well, unless the other system has rsync 2.x. On 03/27/2015 07:29 AM, Aron Rotteveel wrote: > Yes, I removed "--no-inc-recursive", without success. > > -- Best regards / Met vriendelijke groet, > >

...trust of folks to work very hard to make reasonable decisions here. > > - How often they will change, what the term limits are, and so on. > > - What their oversight mechanism is (it appears that the only appeal to > rulings of the committee is to the committee itself, which seems rife for > abuse). > The appeal is to the board of the Foundation. I don't expect the board to *be* the committee here, quite the opposite. > > The LLVM Foundation itself has existed now for over a year and has largely > failed to engage with the community. This is clearly not a g...

Hi all, A couple of people are trying to convince me to come to FOSDEM in Belgium at the end of February. I''m a bit hesitant because I''ve been doing so much travel, but LinuxConf.au was a great experience and seems to have really helped get exposure to Puppet. There seems to be a pretty strong European contingent of Puppet users, and it''d be great to meet

For a company study I am trying to come up with what would one need to replicate *grosso modo and at the functional level* what we get in Rails. This does not need to be an "equivalent" solution, just what a Java programmer would build upon, the canonical aggregation of components, the usual tools. My first fraft is: Struts -> C layer Hibernate -> M

Hi Rusty, I had a look over your 011-paravirt-head.S.patch. I'm struggling to come up with a list of any benefits over having separate entrypoints for each hypervisor. Multiple entry pros: * allows maximum startup flexibility for any given hypervisor * for Xen at least, it's pretty simple * the "what hypervisor am I under" question is answered trivially cons:

Greetings everyone, On behalf of the board of the LLVM Foundation, I’d like to start the process of introducing a formal code of conduct for the community. For a long time, various members of the community have been enforcing basic reasonable and respectful behavior, but to an outsider this may not be obvious. A public code of conduct advertises the behavior we expect of community members and

Hi folks, I''ve been trying to work out this situation for a few days now without much success and dug all over the archives for similar issues, none of which seem to relate exactly. I installed Debian Etch and the Xen (3.03) kernels / binaries on a Dell server. It works fantastic with all the default configurations with one strange flaw - as soon as the /etc/xen/scripts/network-bridge

It is with regret that I announce that Shorewall development and support is officially ended. Sean''s post has finally driven it home to me that in the long term, trying to support a project like Shorewall is impossible for a person of my personality and age. Sean -- please believe that this isn''t about you or your post -- your post was just the proverbial straw on this old