search for: rhl7

I'm now using the openssh-2.5.2p1 version, and the X forwarding on the linux machine is still not working. It's a Redhat 6.2 machine running kernel 2.2.17-14 It doesn't appear to be adding anything to the /tmp/ssh-whatever/cookies file when you log in. I posted some debug info yesterday. Does anyone have some ideas of what I can try next, or is this a known bug?

I've been googling, but after getting nowhere for a while I thought I'd ask for a direction to head in. I am replacing a RH7.1 box that was performing dial-in service using a pppd patched for radius support. I'd prefer not to do things this way and would like to use a more easily updated configuration. What I need it to do is do auth against a radius server and support windows

Hi, Connecting from RHL7 with OpenSSH 2.3.0p1 or 2.5.0p1 to OpenSSH 2.3.0p1 on AIX 4.3.1. Protocol 2 doesn't work if you specify 'Ciphers rijndael128-cbc' or Ciphers 'aes128-cbc'. sshd -d -d -d on the server shows _nothing_ about these connections. I'm not sure if rijndael has been left out from...

...ty: trivial Priority: P2 Component: Documentation AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org ReportedBy: mator at mail.ru RPMs of OpenSSL are available at http://violet.ibs.com.au/openssh/files/support. For Red Hat Linux 6.2, they have been released as errata. RHL7 includes these. host violet.ibs.com.au is not found, please correct INSTALL file. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

...Eventually I managed to create an rpm from the source (actually, that's fairly easy when onw knows to say "python2"), but python-urlgrabber has completely defeated me. According to Dag, the problem is that "upstream" doesn't see the need to support RHAS2.1/Centos2.1/RHL7.x amd such. While I can, if forced, solve the problem by a personal visit to the site or by creating a repo on the other side of the Internet, there should be a better general solution. What is it? -- Cheers John -- spambait 1aaaaaaa at coco.merseine.nu Z1aaaaaaa at coco.merseine.nu Pl...

...es rather than support, The Fedora Core and Legacy do a fine job for several years. Just not 5+ years like RHEL or SLES. Other than the Debian Project, I've yet to see another distro break 2 years of support. Red Hat used to support the last ".2" for a long time. Unfortunately, by RHL7, they got very popular. Companies where standardizing on ".1" and even, gasp, ".0" relesaes. At one point Red Hat was supporting Red Hat Linux 6.2, 7[.0], 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 8.0 and 9 _simultaneously_. That was overkill and a waste. I like the current Core-Legacy strategy now....

...2001 @@ -9,7 +9,9 @@ OpenSSL 0.9.5a or greater: http://www.openssl.org/ -RPMs of OpenSSL are available at http://violet.ibs.com.au/openssh/files/support +RPMs of OpenSSL are available at http://violet.ibs.com.au/openssh/files/support. +For Red Hat Linux 6.2, they have been released as errata. RHL7 includes +these. OpenSSH can utilise Pluggable Authentication Modules (PAM) if your system supports it. PAM is standard on Redhat and Debian Linux, Solaris and @@ -93,7 +95,7 @@ control file as "/etc/pam.d/sshd" (or wherever your system prefers to keep them). A generic PAM configura...

Hi, I built rpm from openssh-2.5.1p1 srpm on redhat 6.2, then installed it. When trying to ssh from other machine, sshd gives error: ..... Feb 20 17:54:24 foo PAM_pwdb[925]: (login) session opened for user doe by LOGIN(uid=0) Feb 20 17:55:15 foo sshd[1342]: Connection closed by 192.168.0.3 Feb 20 17:55:43 foo sshd[1343]: PAM unable to dlopen(/lib/security/pam_stack.so) Feb 20 17:55:43 foo

hi, is anyone using IPv6+linux? -m On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 10:59:09AM +0100, Jos? M. Fandi?o wrote: > Dear friends, > > I'm getting a system freeze when I use a linux ipv6 capable kernel. > > My configuration is a linux kernel-2.2.18 with ipv6 > as module(suse 6.4), openssl 0.9.5 and Openssh-2.5.1p2, > with a default sshd_config file. > > I installed openssh

What version are you using? I also had this problem with a security update of debian. I reported this to then and they fixed it. So if you are using debian, update to the latest version and see if this works Op 8 jun. 2016 10:13 p.m. schreef Dennis Xu <dxu at uoguelph.ca>: Hi, I am checking again if there are any other suggestions. The Samba server is joined to AD successfully. I can

...and SuSE maintain up to 3 simultaneous versions of their 18 month distros. [ Actually, SuSE is dropping the first "enterprise" release, SLES 7 just shy of 5 years. ] So if you are talking about stability/maturity, then run RHEL2.1 or now. Heck, Fedora Legacy is _still_ supporting CL2.3 (RHL7.3) too! ;-> > It will be interesting to see how this works out for Ubuntu. I think it > would be possible to be more aggressive with the application versions > but hold back more than RH on the kernel changes. And that's the real question. What is the "best balance"?...

Hello, I have a x86 Red Hat Linux release 7.0 (Guinness) box. OpenSSL 0.9.6b I downloaded the most recent version of OpenSSH (3.1p1). Attached is the result of ./configure and make. Thanks in advance -------------- next part -------------- # ./configure checking for gcc... gcc checking for C compiler default output... a.out checking whether the C compiler works... yes checking whether we are