search for: rfc6154

Displaying 14 results from an estimated 14 matches for "rfc6154".

2011 Mar 11
4
RFE: IMAP LIST Extension for Special-Use Mailboxes
Timo, would you consider adding support for "IMAP LIST Extension for Special-Use Mailboxes" <http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6154.txt> any time near in the future? I would really love to get rid of all those folders created by all those different mail clients just because they can't agree to use the same folder for special purpose. Obviously clients need to support it too. Having Dovecot support it certainly would ma...
2011 Jun 22
1
LIST-EXTENDED support?
Hi there. Can I check if LIST-EXTENDED refers to RFC 6154 (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6154), rfc for special use mailboxes. I'd like to specify a designated folder as \Spam and etc. Googling "dovecot list-extended" and "dovecot special use" suggests that dovecot supports this feature (via patch logs and 1 bug report for Mozilla Thunderbird which suggests that...
2014 Dec 29
2
SPECIAL-USE again
On 2014-12-29 20:45, Stephan Bosch wrote: > For creating a special use mailbox there is the CREATE-SPECIAL-USE > capability (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6154, Section 3). As you > suggested, the special use attributes can also be changed using the > METADATA capability (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6154, Section 4). > Unfortunately, both of these features are not yet supported by Dovecot. They are also basically two sides of the same feature...
2014 Dec 29
2
SPECIAL-USE again
Hi, Great to see Thunderbird support SPECIAL-USE now. I would like to hear the list about the intended use of SPECIAL-USE. I get the impression from several earlier mails here that the intention is for the server to globally decide what the folder-name of a specific SPECIAL-USE folder is for all users. That's the way the documentation exemplifies it and what I get from posts like this:
2014 Dec 26
4
Thunderbird supports SPECIAL-USE (Merry x-mas!)
...con - sponsored SPECIAL-USE. I hope SPECIAL-USE will make your and your customers life easier. The patch just became ready for x-mas. :) p at rick P.S. Unpacking the gift will have to wait until 2015-05-19. ;) [1] IMAP LIST Extension for Special-Use Mailboxes <http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc6154.txt> [2] automx - mail setup made easy! <https://automx.org/> [3] Mailbox settings http://wiki2.dovecot.org/MailboxSettings [4] Bug 558659 - (RFC6154) Support IMAP LIST SPECIAL-USE (RFC 6154) to autoconfigure Sent, Trash, Draft folders on IMAP servers <https://bugzill...
2013 Jun 01
1
MS asks for feedback on standards support in Outlook/Exchange
...and implements it using the XLIST command (as per MS-STANOIMAP), as documented in MS-STANOIMAP part 2.2.38; however, the LIST command in the same document doesn't mention the extension, so I'd assume it (Outlook 2013) doesn't necessarily support this feature using LIST as specified per RFC6154 (but only using explicitly XLIST.) Usually, any newer IMAP server supporting RFC6154 "LIST" ("XLIST") supports both the older XLIST as well as the newer LIST syntax. If it doesn't, a patch implementing this feature shouldn't be longer than a few (10 maybe?) lines of co...
2014 Dec 29
0
SPECIAL-USE again
...> clients. > - either by setting IMAP METADATA (RFC5464) or by having the userdb > return entries like: "namespace/inbox/Papperskorg/specialuse=\Trash" > (for a swede) For creating a special use mailbox there is the CREATE-SPECIAL-USE capability (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6154, Section 3). As you suggested, the special use attributes can also be changed using the METADATA capability (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6154, Section 4). Unfortunately, both of these features are not yet supported by Dovecot. I think it is already possible to return special use attributes from...
2014 Dec 29
0
SPECIAL-USE again
On 12/29/2014 9:24 PM, Peter Mogensen wrote: > On 2014-12-29 20:45, Stephan Bosch wrote: >> For creating a special use mailbox there is the CREATE-SPECIAL-USE >> capability (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6154, Section 3). As you >> suggested, the special use attributes can also be changed using the >> METADATA capability (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6154, Section 4). >> Unfortunately, both of these features are not yet supported by Dovecot. > > They are also basically two side...
2019 Jun 12
3
Outlook renames Junk folder
Hello, Some versions of Outlook will randomly rename the Junk folder to Junk Email. This of course causes errors because Dovecot can no longer store junk. I go in to Outlook for each user and add another Junk folder, so now they have Junk and Junk Email. This fix action lasts a while until Outlook decides to do it again. Is there a way to tell Dovecot that if the Junk folder doesn't
2012 Jun 21
2
how to use new style namespace for INBOX
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 dear honorable doctor timo reading the list I saw appear a new style for the "writing of INBOX". namely this example mailbox Drafts { special_use = \Drafts } mailbox Junk { special_use = \Junk } mailbox Sent { special_use = \Sent } mailbox "Sent Messages" { special_use = \Sent }
2019 Jun 13
0
Outlook renames Junk folder
...nk. > > I go in to Outlook for each user and add another Junk folder, so now they have Junk and Junk Email. This fix action lasts a while until Outlook decides to do it again. According to https://www.imapwiki.org/SpecialUse <https://www.imapwiki.org/SpecialUse> Outlook might support RFC6154 SPECIAL-USE extension. You can try setting special_use = \Junk for that junk folder. > > Is there a way to tell Dovecot that if the Junk folder doesn't exist, try sending the email to Junk Email folder? > Dovecot does not do that. You must mean sieve script. You can add :create int...
2012 Apr 23
1
questions about SPECIAL-USE and virtual
Hi, I have some questions about Special-Use and virtual namespace: I want to create a virtual namespace with mailboxes: Sent, Unread, Flagged, All. 1. Is it enough to put in the config file: mailbox virtual/Sent { auto = subscribe special_use = \Sent } mailbox virtual/Unread { auto = subscribe special_use = \Unread #Is it correct? } mailbox
2013 Oct 14
0
Questions about special_use mailboxes
...1381746442 7 (2 2))) <<< * OK [CLOSED] Previous mailbox closed.?? <<< * FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft $SENT) <<< * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft $SENT \*)] Flags permitted. Why is the flag $SENT ? http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc6154.html mentiones nothing like that. When I select Spam: >>> y14 SELECT Spam (QRESYNC (1381746444 1)) <<< * OK [CLOSED] Previous mailbox closed. <<< * FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft) <<< * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Dr...
2015 Dec 19
2
Possible bug about the SPECIAL-USE / CREATE-SPECIAL-USE extensions
...ed on my MacBook (via homebrew) that I've been using to test my IMAP library against. What is interesting is that even though Dovecot does not advertise CREATE-SPECIAL-USE, it supports creation of special-use folders via the "CREATE FolderName (USE (\Whatever))" syntax. According to rfc6154, a server is supposed to advertise the CREATE-SPECIAL-USE extension if it supports this: An IMAP server that supports this OPTIONAL feature will advertise the "CREATE-SPECIAL-USE" capability string. Clients MUST NOT use the "USE" parameter unless the server advertises...