search for: rfc2821

I'm running 7.0-RELEASE-i386 on Jetway's NC92-N230 mainboard. The board has one integrated RTL8168/8111 gigabit NIC as well as an expansion board with three RTL8168/8111 NICs. Why would the three NICs work while the onboard NIC does not? none2@pci0:1:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x816810ec chip=0x816810ec rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Realtek Semiconductor' device

...ith messages. Does anyone have a patch that will generate an appropriate EOI to a DigiBoard? Alternatively, can anyone suggest how I can disable or mask a specified PCI interrupt? -- Peter Jeremy Please excuse any delays as the result of my ISP's inability to implement an MTA that is either RFC2821-compliant or matches their claimed behaviour. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 195 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20080603/cfd07fd9/a...

Why would the samba list be looking for a reverse host name via IPV6? IFAIK I only have an IPv4 addr and reverse addr. I don't know if the original went to the person in france or not. Anyone else getting bounces like this? -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 13:19:19 -0700 From: Mail Delivery Subsystem

Greetings, Well, I en devoured to install a copy of 7 as an effort to upgrade one of our servers. After installing a few ports, I began to notice: [: -le: argument expected messages being emitted during the configure/make process. I've already invested a fair amount of time on this upgrade, and /really/ don't want to wipe the disk(s) and start all over. This issue is not new to me - see

I ran into a problem today trying to build the latest firefox in ports firefox-2.0.0.11_1,1. ===> Extracting for firefox-2.0.0.11_1,1 => MD5 Checksum OK for firefox-2.0.0.11-source.tar.bz2. => SHA256 Checksum OK for firefox-2.0.0.11-source.tar.bz2. ===> firefox-2.0.0.11_1,1 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.8 - found ===> Patching for firefox-2.0.0.11_1,1 ===>

...and im never blocked.. but i did setup conform all rfcs.. i block servers in the same way. so yes, i did set my reverse for ipv4 and ipv6.. what most people do wrong.. 1) the hostname must have A and RR (PTR) and MX record. 2) the HELO hostname must have a A Record. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2821#section-2.3.5 and IF you server has an ipv6 ip.. it is preffered over ipv4. and for that reson, or disable ipv6 in total, or set the hostname also. Greetz, Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: samba at tlinx.org [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] >Namens Linda W &...

I would also like to help as well. As KMacy knows before i asked a lot of questions for T2 types of servers but unfortunately i have no more access to those kind of hardware as well. I;m willing to participate if a team will be formated.

Dear List Using dovecot 2.1.7 with LMTP and exim4 I want to accept local parts regardless of their case. Exim does all virtual alias handling and delivers the messages to dovecot LMTP addressed to the right mailbox name. This works well except for addresses which do not need to be resolved by exim and which do have the "wrong" case in the local part. For example: There is a

By default FreeBSD 7.0 shipped with the sysctls set to: kern.maxfiles: 12328 kern.maxfilesperproc: 11095 We recently bumped up against these limits in an unfortunate way and we are going to raise them. I have some questions: * why are the numbers set the way they are? They aren't round numbers, they aren't powers of 2. But they were arrived at somehow with planning and thought

Hey guys, I want to send an email via ROR and I have put this code at the very end in the config/environment.rb file- ActionMailer::Base.delivery_method = :smtp ActionMailer::Base.perform_deliveries = true ActionMailer::Base.logger = nil ActionMailer::Base.raise_delivery_errors = true ActionMailer::Base.smtp_settings = { :address => "[my smtp server]", :port => 25, :domain

Am 07.09.2017 um 20:07 schrieb hw: > Gordon Messmer wrote: >> On 09/07/2017 08:11 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >>> This was always >>> problematic because DNS hostnames and email addresses in the RFC >>> standards were case insensitive >> >> >> Not quite.? SMTP is required to treat the "local-part" of the RCPT >> argument as

I read several posts about SMTP being blocked at ISP. My ISP has the same limitation. My ADSL connection (1 fixed IP) only permits outbound connection to port 25 to their server. None of those posts answered my need. I tried FAQ also. I have several internal email clients/bots that needs to retrieve/send messages, some of then are notebooks. It''s not fair to change SMTP server to the

I was wondering if there was any way to set the ''Return-Path'' of an email when using ActionMailer. Without the ability to set the ''Return-Path'' of an email, it is impossible to avoid being labeled as ''spam'' by many SMTP gateways if trying to send mail on another''s behalf. SPF doesn''t care about the

I am used to sendmail and am using Postfix now and am uncertain of some features. I typically would comment out the line in sendmail.mc that went something like 'accept unresolvable domains' I tried using smtpd_sender_restrictions = reject_unverified_sender reject_unverified_smtp and this seems a bit too restrictive and got some bounces on legitimate senders so I'm

On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Roland Smith <rsmith@xs4all.nl> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 11:34:31AM -0700, Steve Franks wrote: > > Being a naturally curious guy, with your pointers, I've located the following: > > > > [steve@dystant /var/crash]$ sudo cat info.2 > > Yep. This is what you need. > > > > Dump header from device

One line summary: Too many files in a top-level UFS-2 filesystem directory will cause a panic on mount. Kern/Critical/High Priority/SW-Bug Which FreeBSD Release You Are Using: 6.3-STABLE Environment (output of "uname -a" on the problem machine): FreeBSD wahoo.sd67dfl.org 6.3-STABLE FreeBSD 6.3-STABLE #0: Sun Feb 10 21:13:39 CST 2008

One line summary: Too many files in a top-level UFS-2 filesystem directory will cause a panic on mount. Kern/Critical/High Priority/SW-Bug Which FreeBSD Release You Are Using: 6.3-STABLE Environment (output of "uname -a" on the problem machine): FreeBSD wahoo.sd67dfl.org 6.3-STABLE FreeBSD 6.3-STABLE #0: Sun Feb 10 21:13:39 CST 2008

I have a rather busy Apache 2.2 server; tons of small & some large requests. It's a standard Dell 2650 server using the bge (broadcom) network driver. I seem to have a rather strange problem where after just a day or so Apache just stops processing new connections. You can connect to port 80, but trying to get Apache to process any data just hangs. There is nothing strange in

I've been playing around with snapshots lately but I've got a problem on one of my servers running 7-STABLE amd64: FreeBSD paladin 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #8: Mon Nov 10 20:49:51 GMT 2008 tdb@paladin:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PALADIN amd64 I run the mksnap_ffs command to take the snapshot and some time later the system completely freezes up: paladin# cd /u2/.snap/ paladin#

In http://www.freebsd.org/releases/7.0R/announce.html says Updating Existing Systems > An upgrade of any existing system to FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE constitutes > a major version upgrade, so no matter which method you use to update > an older system you should reinstall any ports you have installed on > the machine. This will avoid binaries becoming linked to inconsistent > sets