search for: rewe

...1/00 000001/00/dir1 000001/00/dir1/file1 000001/00/dir1/file2 000001 000001/01 000001/01/dir1 000001/01/dir1/file1 000001/01/dir1/file2 is it possible with rsync ? i tried several options and gets no result kind regards ______________________________________ HINWEIS: Alle von Gesellschaften der REWE International AG elektronisch uebermittelten Auskuenfte, Mitteilungen und Erklaerungen sind vertraulich und rechtlich unverbindlich. Verpflichtungen von Gesellschaften der REWE International AG beduerfen der schriftlichen Einigung in saemtlichen Vertragspunkten sowie der Unterfertigung durch das ve...

Here's the procedure: # qemu-img -f qcow2 /vm/win2k3.img 8G # virt-install --connect qemu:///system -n win2k3 -r 512 --vcpus=1 -c /home/temp/win2003sp2ins.iso -f /vm/win2k3.img -s 4 --network=bridge:br0 --mac=00:ff:ff:ff:58:58 --noautoconsole --vnc --os-type=windows --os-variant=win2k3 --hvm --accelerate And I get error as below: Starting install... internal error unable to start guest: qemu:

Hi. I don''t know if this one is known, but I can''t recall seeing anything about it. If it is old news I apologize. I discovered a bug in the inetd that comes with NetKit-B-0-08 and older. If a single SYN is sent to port 13 of the server, inetd will die of Broken Pipe: write(3, "Sun Jan 12 21:50:35 1997\r\n", 26) = -1 EPIPE (Broken pipe) --- SIGPIPE (Broken pipe) ---

On Tue, 14 Jul 1998, cfb wrote: > The main problem seems to be with the way that debian starts bind using > the script /etc/init.d/bind. I thought it would be really neat to just > change the #!/bin/sh at the top of the script to something like : > #!/usr/sbin/chroot /chroot-dns/ /bin/sh > or > #!/usr/sbin/chroot /chroot-dns/ /chroot-dns/bin/sh try changing

I need to allocate public IP address to two guest os. I have only 2 network card Interface on server. say eth0 and eth1. I set eth1 a public IP address. so it should in # vi /etc/sysconfig/ifcfg-eth1 DEVICE=eth1 BOOTPROTO=static HWADDR=00:1a:4d:83:ad:00 BROADCAST=202.127.29.0 IPADDR=202.127.29.5 NETMASK=255.255.255.0 NETWORK=202.127.29.0 ONBOOT=yes TYPE=Ethernet Question 1: do I have to

I am interested in opinions regarding the use of xinetd versus the use of tcp wrappers. The two programs have similar functionality, but I find xinetd suits my needs better. The biggest problem is the age of xinetd, and AFAIK it is no longer being kept up. Are there any known security issues with xinetd? Another issue is that xinetd makes use of a non-standard inetd.conf layout, but

Marek Michalkiewicz <marekm@I17LINUXB.ISTS.PWR.WROC.PL> wrote: : It seems that most of the RedHat 5.3.12 security patches are in the : standard 5.4.17, except for the patch below. Also, there are more : (different) fixes in 5.4.18 (check h_length against sizeof(sin_addr) : in inet/rcmd.c and inet/rexec.c). : + { : +

[mod: This is the second time in a week that someone asks this question: is it a new attack? It sure looks to me like "userland" has completely locked up, but that the kernel is still working. As an isolated case, my diagnosis is: You probably have a bad block in your /bin/login program or something like that. When two people report this in a week, it's starting to become unlikely

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Date: Fri, 2 May 1997 12:33:00 -0500 > From: "Thomas H. Ptacek" <tqbf@ENTERACT.COM> > On almost all Unix operating systems, having superuser access in a > chroot() jail is still dangerous. In some recent revisions of 4.4BSD > operating systems, root can trivially escape chroot(), as well. I was thinking about possible attacks

Hi, There is a severe problem with the db-1.85.4 library''s Linux port that can be found on sunsite.unc.edu under /pub/Linux/libs/db-1.85.4-src.tar.gz (sp?): This library contains a "snprintf" function which breaks down to a common sprintf, ignoring the size parameter. Obviously, this was thought to be a terribly bad work-around for C libraries which don''t contain an

If it''s any help, here''s a sed script that is reasonably good at pulling out suspicious-looking items generated by various daemons. Fix appropriately... _H* ========== # this should match a buncha different stuff / [Pp]ermi/b ff / PERMI/b ff / [Rr]efuse/b ff / REFUSE/b ff / [Dd]en[yi]/b ff / DEN[YI]/b ff /[Rr]eject/b ff /REJECT/b ff /[Bb]ogus/b ff /[Pp]assw/b ff /PASSW/b ff

The instructions in RHSA-2000:037-01 (2.2.16 kernel update) tell you: 4. Solution: For each RPM for your particular architecture, run: rpm -Fvh [filename] where filename is the name of the RPM. These instructions are incomplete and may result in a system that is unbootable. After updating the RPM files, you should also: (1) run mkinitrd to create a new initial ramdisk image

I picked up the following from Bugtraq. -----Forwarded message from David Phillips <phillips@PCISYS.NET>----- MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <01BC5D8D.679DD4A0@frank56.pcisys.net> Date: Sat, 10 May 1997 21:56:05 -0600 Reply-To: David Phillips <phillips@PCISYS.NET> Sender: Bugtraq List

Hi everyone, Thanks all for your feedback. Here is a reply to most of your comments.... Roger. Chris Evans wrote: > On Mon, 9 Mar 1998, Rogier Wolff wrote: > > not to give those rights away. A non-setuid program should not have to > > worry about buffer overruns (you can crash the program, wow!). It > Just a reminder, that in some cases, it _should_ worry. As a

Hi, I''ve been writing a login application to utilize the features of both PAM and libpwdb. Not surprisingly, this has meant looking at some old code.. The following denial of service attack seems to work quite nicely on my ancient Red Hat 3.0.3 system with the standard login application. Perhaps this is not a problem with 4.0? Does anyone know about other distributions? joe$ nvi

Hi all, I'm just looking at using smbtar to backup the Win95 PC's on my network, and would like usability ideas please. The tape drive I intend to use is in our RS6000 and has a capacity of 20GB before compression which means that I will be able to fit plenty of PC's onto one tape as all the PC's have <3GB HD's on them. The problem I have is how do I get multiple

Hi- I heard about a bug in ipchains, could you please tell me what to do? Thanks

Phexro <ieure@linknet.kitsap.lib.wa.us> writes: > chroot()''d processes. So, important system calls could be modified thus: Since there are tons of syscalls and new ones appearing all the time, "Fixing" some of them doesn''t seem like a good idea. It seems more reasonbale to deny access to all of them, except for a few specific ones (that can moreover be

The advanced voice mail options in RC1 is not providing any functionality except "4 - place outgoing call" and "* - return to mail menu". Below is a sample line from voice mail.conf: 210 => 234,test1,test@dotality.com,,|attach=no|cid=yes|review=yes The is a rew install from the tgz file. No patched have been made to the source code. I did try to apply the advanced10

>To: Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS ><centos-virt at centos.org> Message-ID: ><448255702.63.1260531144350.JavaMail.root at mail.chi.ldsys.net> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 >----- "rewing" <rewing at howfortune.com> wrote: >> I need to allocate public IP address to two guest os. >> > >I have only 2 network card