search for: reunited

After several weeks of discussion the leaders of Compiz and Beryl have agreed that the two communities shall reunite. This decision is supported by both David and Quinn and represents the majority decision of the administrators and developers in each community. At this early stage not a lot has been decided, but these are the main points of the agreement: - As had previously been decided,

...generation for http://api.rubyonrails.com/ * Bump up the version number actionmailer-1.2.3/lib/action_mailer/vendor/tmail/info.rb or alter it somehow from the current ''0.10.7'' (which is also, confusingly, a previous version of TMail) * Push the changes upstream so both version are reunited with standard behaviour Cheers, Paul.

I know that R is very advanced when it comes to DateTime handling. I am not quite as advanced as R however. I just downloaded a stupendously ugly dataset of hourly air temperature from 1985 to 2003. It has a great many NAs. I want to extract mean, median, max, and min monthly values. So far I have read it in as object. Date and Time are factors and Temp is an int. > summary(temp.dat)

2015-12-08 17:54 GMT+01:00 Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org>: > On 08/12/15 16:33, mathias dufresne wrote: > >> 2015-12-08 17:15 GMT+01:00 Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org>: >> >> On 08/12/15 16:02, mathias dufresne wrote: >>> >>> On any Linux system where you want to be able to use AD users as system >>>> users you need to

Dear Experts, I got Two Netware 6 Servers in the Same LAN. Server A is a main server (File Server). I'ld like to configure Server B as Backup server for Server A with RSync. I've follwed the documetnation at http://www.novell.com/coolsolutions/netware/features/trenches/tr_rsync_nw.html But im confused how to start the process. Kindly help me how to Configure rsync in Server

On Sun, 2007-04-01 at 20:11 -0400, Jeffrey Laramie wrote: > Hi David, > > If you've been following the discussion on the forum and/or compizadmin list, > you can see that we aren't getting anywhere with these discussions. The > hangup seems to be selecting a new name for the Compiz-Extra division. The > Beryl people feel it's the only thing they're asking for

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, I've written a HowTo for 'Samba domain with LDAP back end' and am looking for people to test it and tell me the stupid things I did. I also wanted to put the HowTo out there in case others wanted to do something similar and because I know you've got nothing better to do on your weekend than play with Linux ;) I'm by no

Hi, is it possible to Restore files deleted with " rm rf " from ext4 or ext3 filesystem by mistake. Regards Ahmad

This was a private mail and not supposed to go to the compiz list. Please don't don't read it unless you're on the compiz admin list. :) I've apologized to Jeff, Mike, Rico and Arturo for making this mistake and I'd like to apologize to anyone else who might have been offended by it. I guess the good part is that you get an uncensored view of what we feel about the community

Compiz and Beryl merge: What's really going on? Recently Quinns post to the beryl-dev mailing list entitled 'Merge on' has led to a lot of discussion, some of which has been good and some of which has led to a lot of misinformation, to clear things up I'd like to give the story of the merge, and the justification for some of the more peculiar aspects. Basically lets try to avoid

> On Jan 7, 2020, at 13:57, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 6:05 PM Daniel Sanders <daniel_l_sanders at apple.com <mailto:daniel_l_sanders at apple.com>> wrote: > > >> On Jan 6, 2020, at 14:29, David Blaikie via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:

On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 5:27 PM Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 3:18 PM Daniel Sanders via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> >> >> On Jan 7, 2020, at 13:57, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 6:05 PM Daniel Sanders

Right. I think that's what we ended up doing rather than a more general attribute on the module itself. *shrugs* Probably ok? I'd probably prefer not to have to have target code to do the evaluation if possible, but everything is weird and an edge case - mips abis more than some :) -eric On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 8:58 AM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > Oh, I should

I also work on the RISC-V backend, and have been doing a little work on the ELF psABI document for RISC-V. I agree that, conceptually, the psABI choice should be in the module metadata. Zakk, however, has discovered a phase ordering issue within LLVM that relates to this approach. The phase ordering problem is that the LTO backend is currently setup without interrogating the current module for

David Blaikie via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> 於 2020年1月11日 週六 上午2:03寫道： > Ah, OK - thanks for walking me through that. > > Fair enough, I think I understand the issue/tradeoff now - and that the > other module level metadata don't currently influence the target > configuration at this level? > > I'm not sure, I only know that the target-abi is decided

David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> 於 2020年1月14日 週二 上午2:15寫道： > > > On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 6:12 AM Zakk <zakk0610 at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> David Blaikie via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> 於 2020年1月11日 週六 >> 上午2:03寫道： >> >>> Ah, OK - thanks for walking me through that. >>> >>> Fair enough, I

On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 8:05 AM Sam Elliott via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > To follow up on this issue: > > Our plan is still to encode `target-abi` into the module flags for RISC-V > LLVM IR modules. As was pointed out earlier in this thread, the function > lowering in Clang is slightly different for the ABIs which support hardware > floating point.

On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 3:04 PM Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 2:56 PM David Blaikie via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 8:05 AM Sam Elliott via llvm-dev < >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >>> To follow up on this issue:

> On Jan 6, 2020, at 14:29, David Blaikie via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 5:58 AM Zakk <zakk0610 at gmail.com <mailto:zakk0610 at gmail.com>> wrote: > > > David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com <mailto:dblaikie at gmail.com>> 於 2020年1月6日 週一 下午2:23寫道： > If this is something that can vary per

This patch series enhances the existing virtio-balloon with the following new features: 1) fast ballooning: transfer ballooned pages between the guest and host in chunks using sgs, instead of one array each time; and 2) free page block reporting: a new virtqueue to report guest free pages to the host. The second feature can be used to accelerate live migration of VMs. Here are some details: Live