search for: reunite

After several weeks of discussion the leaders of Compiz and Beryl have agreed that the two communities shall reunite. This decision is supported by both David and Quinn and represents the majority decision of the administrators and developers in each community. At this early stage not a lot has been decided, but these are the main points of the agreement: - As had previously been decided, Compiz will effectiv...

...generation for http://api.rubyonrails.com/ * Bump up the version number actionmailer-1.2.3/lib/action_mailer/vendor/tmail/info.rb or alter it somehow from the current ''0.10.7'' (which is also, confusingly, a previous version of TMail) * Push the changes upstream so both version are reunited with standard behaviour Cheers, Paul.

I know that R is very advanced when it comes to DateTime handling. I am not quite as advanced as R however. I just downloaded a stupendously ugly dataset of hourly air temperature from 1985 to 2003. It has a great many NAs. I want to extract mean, median, max, and min monthly values. So far I have read it in as object. Date and Time are factors and Temp is an int. > summary(temp.dat)

2015-12-08 17:54 GMT+01:00 Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org>: > On 08/12/15 16:33, mathias dufresne wrote: > >> 2015-12-08 17:15 GMT+01:00 Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org>: >> >> On 08/12/15 16:02, mathias dufresne wrote: >>> >>> On any Linux system where you want to be able to use AD users as system >>>> users you need to

...7 days incremental backup. kindly help me Thnaks in adv., malleswar Malleswara Rao.N.D M.B.A Manager, Sys Admin Dept., Efftronics Sys Pvt Ltd., Vijayawada. INDIA ___________________________________________________ Meet your old school or college friends from 1 Million + database... Click here to reunite www.batchmates.com/rediff.asp

...g they're asking for and they won't > concede this point. > > In case you're not up to speed the general idea is that the divisions we > created would remain as we agreed Compiz-Core and the compiz package name > would remain unchanged. The Compiz-Extra division would reunite with Beryl > under a new name. The current opinions: > > Mike - Doesn't really want to merge and just wants to try and get some of > their devs. > > Rico - Wants to merge but doesn't want to change the name. Thinks they should > just return to compiz and we can tal...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, I've written a HowTo for 'Samba domain with LDAP back end' and am looking for people to test it and tell me the stupid things I did. I also wanted to put the HowTo out there in case others wanted to do something similar and because I know you've got nothing better to do on your weekend than play with Linux ;) I'm by no

Hi, is it possible to Restore files deleted with " rm rf " from ext4 or ext3 filesystem by mistake. Regards Ahmad

...and they won't > > concede this point. > > > > In case you're not up to speed the general idea is that the divisions we > > created would remain as we agreed Compiz-Core and the compiz package name > > would remain unchanged. The Compiz-Extra division would reunite with Beryl > > under a new name. The current opinions: > > > > Mike - Doesn't really want to merge and just wants to try and get some of > > their devs. > > > > Rico - Wants to merge but doesn't want to change the name. Thinks they should > > j...

...the reasons for the fork, and frankly Quinn just wasn't willing to budge or really discuss it in a reasonable fashion, so things were kind of dead. After a while onestone started working on a new libberylsettings in tandem with David (and drew a few others in to working on it), so that we could reunite the Compiz and Beryl settings systems (the biggest differences), and this kind of brought some interest back to the merge. None of us were really sure how to make it happen due to the aforementioned inability to make a decision, so eventually 4 of us (onestone, maniac, iXce, and I) (at the risk of...

...default. - Along the same lines, we also supported cross-linking specific variants of the O32 ABI. There was only supposed to be one O32 but an unfortunate mis-reading of the ABI spec coupled with a failure to catch it with conformance tests split it in two. Luckily, Matthew Fortune found a way to reunite them without breaking either one by adding a third that followed the original intent of the spec and was compatible with either one (but not both at once) and then migrating everyone to that. > If it can vary per function, then the ABI information shouldn't be used outside the per-function...

...also supported cross-linking specific variants >> of the O32 ABI. There was only supposed to be one O32 but an unfortunate >> mis-reading of the ABI spec coupled with a failure to catch it with >> conformance tests split it in two. Luckily, Matthew Fortune found a way to >> reunite them without breaking either one by adding a third that followed >> the original intent of the spec and was compatible with either one (but not >> both at once) and then migrating everyone to that. >> >> > *sigh* I remember that. :) > > Thanks for chiming in Daniel!...

...ecific >>>> variants of the O32 ABI. There was only supposed to be one O32 but an >>>> unfortunate mis-reading of the ABI spec coupled with a failure to catch it >>>> with conformance tests split it in two. Luckily, Matthew Fortune found a >>>> way to reunite them without breaking either one by adding a third that >>>> followed the original intent of the spec and was compatible with either one >>>> (but not both at once) and then migrating everyone to that. >>>> >>>> >>> *sigh* I remember that. :)...

...ult. > - Along the same lines, we also supported cross-linking specific variants of the O32 ABI. There was only supposed to be one O32 but an unfortunate mis-reading of the ABI spec coupled with a failure to catch it with conformance tests split it in two. Luckily, Matthew Fortune found a way to reunite them without breaking either one by adding a third that followed the original intent of the spec and was compatible with either one (but not both at once) and then migrating everyone to that. > > > *sigh* I remember that. :) > > Thanks for chiming in Daniel! > > -eric >...

...also supported cross-linking specific >> variants of the O32 ABI. There was only supposed to be one O32 but an >> unfortunate mis-reading of the ABI spec coupled with a failure to catch it >> with conformance tests split it in two. Luckily, Matthew Fortune found a >> way to reunite them without breaking either one by adding a third that >> followed the original intent of the spec and was compatible with either one >> (but not both at once) and then migrating everyone to that. >> > >> > >> > *sigh* I remember that. :) >> > >&g...

...ecific >>>> variants of the O32 ABI. There was only supposed to be one O32 but an >>>> unfortunate mis-reading of the ABI spec coupled with a failure to catch it >>>> with conformance tests split it in two. Luckily, Matthew Fortune found a >>>> way to reunite them without breaking either one by adding a third that >>>> followed the original intent of the spec and was compatible with either one >>>> (but not both at once) and then migrating everyone to that. >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > *sigh*...

...e same lines, we also supported cross-linking specific > variants of the O32 ABI. There was only supposed to be one O32 but an > unfortunate mis-reading of the ABI spec coupled with a failure to catch it > with conformance tests split it in two. Luckily, Matthew Fortune found a > way to reunite them without breaking either one by adding a third that > followed the original intent of the spec and was compatible with either one > (but not both at once) and then migrating everyone to that. > > > > > > > > > *sigh* I remember that. :) > > > > >...

...cross-linking specific >>> variants of the O32 ABI. There was only supposed to be one O32 but an >>> unfortunate mis-reading of the ABI spec coupled with a failure to catch it >>> with conformance tests split it in two. Luckily, Matthew Fortune found a >>> way to reunite them without breaking either one by adding a third that >>> followed the original intent of the spec and was compatible with either one >>> (but not both at once) and then migrating everyone to that. >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > *sigh* I rem...

> On Jan 6, 2020, at 14:29, David Blaikie via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 5:58 AM Zakk <zakk0610 at gmail.com <mailto:zakk0610 at gmail.com>> wrote: > > > David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com <mailto:dblaikie at gmail.com>> 於 2020年1月6日 週一 下午2:23寫道： > If this is something that can vary per

This patch series enhances the existing virtio-balloon with the following new features: 1) fast ballooning: transfer ballooned pages between the guest and host in chunks using sgs, instead of one array each time; and 2) free page block reporting: a new virtqueue to report guest free pages to the host. The second feature can be used to accelerate live migration of VMs. Here are some details: Live