Displaying 20 results from an estimated 22 matches for "retorting".
Did you mean:
reporting
2008 Mar 22
11
An Issue concerning FS2004
Hi!
I've just installed FS2004.
I am using version 0.9.54, as recommended in the AppDB.
My Linux OS Is Debian Etch(4.0) With a fully capable processor(Games of such category run perfectly on Windows).
Followed the instructions: Installed via the "WINXP" Mode, then switched to Windows 98.
Here's the problem:
The Splash screen is showing, then it disappears and these are the errors
2016 Apr 22
1
Storage cluster advise, anybody?
On Fri, 22 Apr 2016, Digimer wrote:
> Then you would use pacemaker to manage the floating IP, fence
> (stonith) a lost node, and promote drbd->mount FS->start nfsd->start
> floating IP.
My favorite acronym: stonith -- shoot the other node in the head.
--
Paul Heinlein
heinlein at madboa.com
45?38' N, 122?6' W
2006 Jun 09
2
Terms..?
I read this list often, and although I'm not smart enough to contribute,
I learn a lot every day.
But I read a post from this morning that contained this:
>a fair amount of jiggery-pokery
Just wondering...is this a technical term? Where is it documented?
I won't offer any insight into what vision it gave me.
;-)
Thanks for all the work on the distribution and all the invaluable
2008 Jan 10
0
Zimbra: To our CentOS users
Hi,
There is a new annoucement in Zimbra site (http://www.zimbra.com/forums/announcements/14213-our-centos-users.html) in response to discussion started by
Johnny Hughes retorting the first announcement made by Zimbra not supporting CentOS (http://www.zimbra.com/forums/installation/14144-centos-not-supported.html). For your info.
junji
aisalen.wordpress.com
Linux Registered User #253162
Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
2011 Nov 03
2
[LLVMdev] RFC: Upcoming Build System Changes
Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> writes:
> Forgive me, but I've lost track of how any of this has to do with
> Daniel's proposal. Recursive make vs not, make vs cmake all don't
> actually matter to his proposal.
One of the problems with Daniel's proposal is that besides addressing
the duplicity issue, it has no applications to back it up. The things
mentioned
2006 Mar 07
9
Oh this is bad.... bindaddr and rtp traffic
I have a configuration where RTP traffic is going out interface pub0, and coming back into through pub1.
I have bindaddr=0.0.0.0 in sip.conf, and a netstat -an shows:
udp 0 788 0.0.0.0:5060 0.0.0.0:*
which means that Asterisk is listening on all addresses (on all interfaces?).
Anyway, when the RTP traffic comes back in on interface pub0, Asterisk does nothing with it. A
2009 Jul 09
5
can 2 quad T1 cards work in 1 quad core amd server
I was wondering if (2) quad T1 cards
will work nicely in 1 server with a quad core AMD 3.0 gig cpu?
Basically used to dial out and deliver messages. play wav files for the
message.
Any thoughts.
Jerry
2011 Nov 02
0
[LLVMdev] RFC: Upcoming Build System Changes
On Nov 1, 2011, at 6:41 PM, Óscar Fuentes wrote:
> Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> writes:
>
>>> You keep repeating that and I say that it is wrong. Can you mention a
>>> serialization point on the LLVM build caused by recursive make?
>>> (GenLibDeps is not such example, as described on a previous message.)
>>
>> Any use of DIRS is a
2007 Mar 14
4
what happened to asterisk wiki???
Hi
im trying access the www.voip-info.org website since yesterday but i cant
open it. google search diaplay correct search results but it doesnt open
when i click the link. it displays a message about tcp error which says
-->"There was a problem communicating with the server". I dont know what the
problem is. I just want to ask whether their server is down or not and is
everybody
2011 Nov 02
2
[LLVMdev] RFC: Upcoming Build System Changes
Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> writes:
>> You keep repeating that and I say that it is wrong. Can you mention a
>> serialization point on the LLVM build caused by recursive make?
>> (GenLibDeps is not such example, as described on a previous message.)
>
> Any use of DIRS is a serialization point. For example, lib/Support ->
> lib/TableGen -> utils
2011 Nov 03
0
[LLVMdev] RFC: Upcoming Build System Changes
On Nov 2, 2011, at 5:30 PM, Óscar Fuentes wrote:
> Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> writes:
>
>> Forgive me, but I've lost track of how any of this has to do with
>> Daniel's proposal. Recursive make vs not, make vs cmake all don't
>> actually matter to his proposal.
>
> One of the problems with Daniel's proposal is that besides
2002 Jan 10
2
Where is the best place to get ALL the changes between versions?
There seems to be a change in the behavior of the
function ' mean() ' in 1.40.
In earlier versions, the application of mean to a
dataframe (all numeric)would return the aggregate mean
of all of the columns. Now, in 1.40 application of
mean to the dataframe returns a list of the column
means. The new 'help' documents the new behavior. So
the change is obviously intend
I read the
2007 Aug 31
2
Microsoft RTAudio
Hello Ivo:
One more from me and I suppose a retort by you
and that's it ... no flame war please. Let's see
if we can keep this discussion objective.
I've had enough life experience to have seen and
heard the mistakes you've made many times. Point by point:
* This is a tech list that I joined a number
of years ago because of a serious intent to use
the Speex product in my
2006 Aug 18
2
Error: Kernel image does not exist: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.16-xen3_86.1_rhel4.1
Hello,
I am trying to boot an RHAS 4 release 3 guest kernel (the binary release
available through Redhat Network) from a SLES 10 dom0 host (the binary
release available through Suse''s software distribution channel). Both
systems are installed as physical partitions in a standard multiboot
configuration on a single hard drive on a recent vintage HP Pavilion
(zd7380) notebook PC with a
2007 Aug 31
4
Microsoft RTAudio
Hello Jean:
Big mistake!!
One of the three things that a supplier should never discuss is
politics ... that's business 101.
Speex may be a very good product, but we will never use it because of
the politics that you espouse ... some of us out here believe
strongly in the free market. And we also know that monopolies can't
exist because entrepreneurs will always exploit the
2008 May 13
3
[LLVMdev] Preferring to use GCC instead of LLVM
Owen Anderson wrote:
> There's nothing particularly stopping you from having your
> installation package include copies of gas and ld,
I disagree. gas and ld are not available on Windoze, except
via MinGW. Yes I can make or tell my customers to install
MinGW, but if MinGW is installed, then I don't need LLVM.
(More about this further ahead)
> You're welcome to think
2007 Feb 16
13
negate the regexp in validates_format_of
Railsters:
ActiveRecord''s validation system puts other database systems to shame.
However, the newbies might not know how to write a regexp that
excludes a match, instead of tests for it. Understand - I''m just
asking this question to help them. I have been using Regexps since
''grep'' on Xenix! But the newbies here might not know how to do this:
2006 Aug 03
31
CentOS Based Fierwall Document
For those of you that either have an older revision of my firewall document, or are otherwise keeping track of it, there is a new version available. The current version of the document is version 3.1. It's changed rather significantly in some areas.
2008 May 13
9
[LLVMdev] Preferring to use GCC instead of LLVM
Jon Harrop wrote:
> Can you explain why you would like to generate DLLs on the
> customer's computer rather than using LLVM as a JIT
> compiler?
Customers/clients unhappy with the inefficiency, extra CPU
and RAM usage, and performance penalty of JIT. They require
a faster, more efficient solution. The solution is to fully
compile programs to native code at the time of
2007 Jun 05
16
CentOS Based Linux Firewall Document
I know that some of you from the list have asked me in the past for a copy of my CentOS based Linux Firewall document. There are also those that have no clue what I am talking about. This is for the former group...
There is a new version of my document out. It's changed quite a bit since the last person asked me for it. Some of the changes are:
* Updated the scripts in the Useful Shell