search for: retort

Hi! I've just installed FS2004. I am using version 0.9.54, as recommended in the AppDB. My Linux OS Is Debian Etch(4.0) With a fully capable processor(Games of such category run perfectly on Windows). Followed the instructions: Installed via the "WINXP" Mode, then switched to Windows 98. Here's the problem: The Splash screen is showing, then it disappears and these are the errors

On Fri, 22 Apr 2016, Digimer wrote: > Then you would use pacemaker to manage the floating IP, fence > (stonith) a lost node, and promote drbd->mount FS->start nfsd->start > floating IP. My favorite acronym: stonith -- shoot the other node in the head. -- Paul Heinlein heinlein at madboa.com 45?38' N, 122?6' W

I read this list often, and although I'm not smart enough to contribute, I learn a lot every day. But I read a post from this morning that contained this: >a fair amount of jiggery-pokery Just wondering...is this a technical term? Where is it documented? I won't offer any insight into what vision it gave me. ;-) Thanks for all the work on the distribution and all the invaluable

Hi, There is a new annoucement in Zimbra site (http://www.zimbra.com/forums/announcements/14213-our-centos-users.html) in response to discussion started by Johnny Hughes retorting the first announcement made by Zimbra not supporting CentOS (http://www.zimbra.com/forums/installation/14144-centos-not-supported.html). For your info. junji aisalen.wordpress.com Linux Registered User #253162 Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com

...hat's what he wants to do). Shifting to his system all the decisions that depends on those tests is going quite a stretch further. > While you might *want* cmake to replace make in the near term, No, I don't want that. Somebody suggested that having two build systems is a problem, so I retorted that if one of them must stay, is the cmake system, for obvious reasons. > it just isn't going to happen. I don't see how his proposal actually > makes our system cmake worse, and all of your arguments seem to trying > to convince everyone that cmake is better than make. What...

I have a configuration where RTP traffic is going out interface pub0, and coming back into through pub1. I have bindaddr=0.0.0.0 in sip.conf, and a netstat -an shows: udp 0 788 0.0.0.0:5060 0.0.0.0:* which means that Asterisk is listening on all addresses (on all interfaces?). Anyway, when the RTP traffic comes back in on interface pub0, Asterisk does nothing with it. A

I was wondering if (2) quad T1 cards will work nicely in 1 server with a quad core AMD 3.0 gig cpu? Basically used to dial out and deliver messages. play wav files for the message. Any thoughts. Jerry

On Nov 1, 2011, at 6:41 PM, Óscar Fuentes wrote: > Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> writes: > >>> You keep repeating that and I say that it is wrong. Can you mention a >>> serialization point on the LLVM build caused by recursive make? >>> (GenLibDeps is not such example, as described on a previous message.) >> >> Any use of DIRS is a

Hi im trying access the www.voip-info.org website since yesterday but i cant open it. google search diaplay correct search results but it doesnt open when i click the link. it displays a message about tcp error which says -->"There was a problem communicating with the server". I dont know what the problem is. I just want to ask whether their server is down or not and is everybody

Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> writes: >> You keep repeating that and I say that it is wrong. Can you mention a >> serialization point on the LLVM build caused by recursive make? >> (GenLibDeps is not such example, as described on a previous message.) > > Any use of DIRS is a serialization point. For example, lib/Support -> > lib/TableGen -> utils

...ler parts. We have a notion of reusable components, but these are not exposed in a useful way in the build system. >> While you might *want* cmake to replace make in the near term, > > No, I don't want that. Somebody suggested that having two build systems > is a problem, so I retorted that if one of them must stay, is the cmake > system, for obvious reasons. Ok, glad we're on the same page then. >> it just isn't going to happen. I don't see how his proposal actually >> makes our system cmake worse, and all of your arguments seem to trying >>...

There seems to be a change in the behavior of the function ' mean() ' in 1.40. In earlier versions, the application of mean to a dataframe (all numeric)would return the aggregate mean of all of the columns. Now, in 1.40 application of mean to the dataframe returns a list of the column means. The new 'help' documents the new behavior. So the change is obviously intend I read the

Hello Ivo: One more from me and I suppose a retort by you and that's it ... no flame war please. Let's see if we can keep this discussion objective. I've had enough life experience to have seen and heard the mistakes you've made many times. Point by point: * This is a tech list that I joined a number of years ago because of...

...g to ''free.'' ). I''ve been struggling for several days with this problem following an uneventful (with the exception of the proprietary nvidia driver I had to uninstall) boot into the SLES 10 domain 0 kernel. The problem is that I cannot get beyond xm''s catatonic retort: Error: Kernel image does not exist: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.16-xen3_86.1_rhel4.1 whenever I try to boot the guest domain mentioned above using the command line (per the xen 3.0 user manual): xm create [-c] /etc/xen/vm/rhas4, where rhas4 is the name of the configuration file for the g...

Hello Jean: Big mistake!! One of the three things that a supplier should never discuss is politics ... that's business 101. Speex may be a very good product, but we will never use it because of the politics that you espouse ... some of us out here believe strongly in the free market. And we also know that monopolies can't exist because entrepreneurs will always exploit the

...said that my thread was a "bad joke". > You are not a customer here; there is no vendor-customer > relationship. Obviously I am already aware that I have not purchased anything from the LLVM group. > So when it was suggested that you write the code, it was > not a flip retort; in fact, such is the only way the > project advances. It would be crazy to dive in and start writing LLVM code before discussing/debating the issues here first. > you must keep an open mind, since the community will not > find you a solution within your framework if you > over-co...

Railsters: ActiveRecord''s validation system puts other database systems to shame. However, the newbies might not know how to write a regexp that excludes a match, instead of tests for it. Understand - I''m just asking this question to help them. I have been using Regexps since ''grep'' on Xenix! But the newbies here might not know how to do this:

For those of you that either have an older revision of my firewall document, or are otherwise keeping track of it, there is a new version available. The current version of the document is version 3.1. It's changed rather significantly in some areas.

Jon Harrop wrote: > Can you explain why you would like to generate DLLs on the > customer's computer rather than using LLVM as a JIT > compiler? Customers/clients unhappy with the inefficiency, extra CPU and RAM usage, and performance penalty of JIT. They require a faster, more efficient solution. The solution is to fully compile programs to native code at the time of

I know that some of you from the list have asked me in the past for a copy of my CentOS based Linux Firewall document. There are also those that have no clue what I am talking about. This is for the former group... There is a new version of my document out. It's changed quite a bit since the last person asked me for it. Some of the changes are: * Updated the scripts in the Useful Shell