Displaying 20 results from an estimated 390 matches for "retarget".
2010 Feb 18
1
[LLVMdev] Master's thesis: Retargetable Compiler Backend for Transport Triggered Architectures
Hi all,
I think this master's thesis from our group could be of
interest. It describes the "bridge" between the LLVM codegen
and our custom TTA codegen in TCE: a runtime retargetable architecture
description file driven LLVM compiler backend. The thesis might be
useful also for people implementing backends for LLVM in general.
http://tce.cs.tut.fi/doc/Compiler.pdf
If you have any questions or comments, please direct them to
me (I'm not the author of this thesis despit...
2013 Oct 08
57
[Bug 2158] New: Race condition in receiving SIGTERM
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2158
Bug ID: 2158
Summary: Race condition in receiving SIGTERM
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 6.2p1
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P5
Component: sshd
Assignee: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org
2013 Jul 15
0
[LLVMdev] Need compiler retargetted for legacy console system
...n briefly
that John Carmack created to make Doom for the system. But he lost that
long ago and couldn't release it if he had it still. Now any work to get
the main backbone of power out of the systems GPU must be done in time
consuming ASM and no one in the community is experienced with retargetting.
We are a relatively small community and probably could never raise the
50k+ in a reasonable time that it would cost a pro team to do this for us.
We could raise some money but my offer is more for those who are actually
learning to do these things and NEED a target that no one has ever...
2006 Nov 01
4
[LLVMdev] LLVM / C--
...all evil."
http://www.acm.org/ubiquity/views/v7i24_fallacy.html
"That would then force us to choose a
versatile target architecture (such as PPC) and minimize
architecture-dependent optimizations."
http://www.cs.ualberta.ca/~pengzhao/open64-devel/msg00205.html
Will we be able to retarget easily LLVM ?
Has it a sense to retarget a compiler ?
Nowadays, this is the holy grail, if not we will not be able to get rid of
legacy architectures ...
For example, here is cutting-edge stuff in the embedded design :
http://www.sandbridgetech.com/sandbridge_solutions.htm
http://www.arc.com/...
2012 Dec 17
15
[Bug 2052] New: Memory leak when SSH login and logout
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2052
Bug ID: 2052
Summary: Memory leak when SSH login and logout
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 6.1p1
Hardware: MIPS
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P5
Component: sshd
Assignee:
2010 Nov 04
8
[Bug 1833] New: incorrect completion of quoted directory
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1833
Summary: incorrect completion of quoted directory
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 5.6p1
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P2
Component: sftp
AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org
ReportedBy: djm at
2013 Jan 07
0
[LLVMdev] Retargetting llvm to a simplified X86_64 architecture
Hey guys,
I'm trying to implement a simplified X86_64 architecture targeting backend for LLVM. While I have figured that I can introduce the intended architecture as a subtarget of X86 in X86.td, what i don't understand is how the registers specified in X86RegisterInfo.td and the ISA in X86InstrInfo.td are correlated with each sub-architecture. Where are the correlations defined? The
2007 Apr 10
2
[LLVMdev] Using LLVM as a cross compiler without fully retargeting gcc?
We are using LLVM to target a customizable processor
architecture. One of the activities to be supported is
architecture exploration, where one explores the processor
design space (e.g. connectivity, number of FUs) and tries
to find a good match for the application at hand.
The exploration needs to be relatively rapid, so targeting
and compiling gcc for each of the processor variants is
not
2007 Apr 10
0
[LLVMdev] Using LLVM as a cross compiler without fully retargeting gcc?
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007, [ISO-8859-1] Pertti Kellom�ki wrote:
> Is this correct? If so, can I just grab any one of the targets
> supported by gcc, and modify the data sizes etc. to my liking?
Yep, that should work. If you just use -emit-llvm all the time, you
should be able to use any target GCC supports.
> Any technical reasons to avoid or prefer any one of the targets?
Not that I can
2018 Mar 26
23
[Bug 2846] New: PermitOpen rule in sshd_config is not case insensitive
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2846
Bug ID: 2846
Summary: PermitOpen rule in sshd_config is not case insensitive
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 7.6p1
Hardware: Other
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P5
Component: sshd
Assignee: unassigned-bugs
2015 Aug 05
27
[Bug 2439] New: New sha256-base64 SSH Fingerprints in openssh-6.8
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2439
Bug ID: 2439
Summary: New sha256-base64 SSH Fingerprints in openssh-6.8
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 6.9p1
Hardware: Other
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P5
Component: Miscellaneous
Assignee:
2008 Dec 02
12
[Bug 1542] New: Send echo on/off flag to SSH_ASKPASS
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1542
Summary: Send echo on/off flag to SSH_ASKPASS
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: -current
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ssh
AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org
ReportedBy: t8m at
2013 Sep 12
10
[Bug 2152] New: Simplify handling of sftp(1) command flags
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2152
Bug ID: 2152
Summary: Simplify handling of sftp(1) command flags
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: -current
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P5
Component: sftp
Assignee: unassigned-bugs at
2010 Jul 15
13
[Bug 1798] New: Add fsync() support to sftp/sftp-server
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1798
Summary: Add fsync() support to sftp/sftp-server
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: -current
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: sftp-server
AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org
2009 May 07
13
[Bug 1596] New: Option parser does not permit a double-quote character to occur in option values
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1596
Summary: Option parser does not permit a double-quote character
to occur in option values
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 5.2p1
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: low-hanging-fruit
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
2008 Dec 18
15
[Bug 1545] New: ssh-keygen -R removes all comments from known_hosts file
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1545
Summary: ssh-keygen -R removes all comments from known_hosts
file
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 5.1p1
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ssh-keygen
AssignedTo:
2011 Feb 24
7
[Bug 1870] New: Do not show VisualHostKey unless attached to a terminal
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1870
Summary: Do not show VisualHostKey unless attached to a
terminal
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 5.5p1
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ssh
AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at
2010 Mar 24
11
[Bug 1742] New: sshconnect should use port returned by getaddrinfo
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1742
Summary: sshconnect should use port returned by getaddrinfo
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 5.4p1
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: ssh
AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org
2013 Dec 16
15
[Bug 2185] New: Allow entering the PIN via reader pinpad
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2185
Bug ID: 2185
Summary: Allow entering the PIN via reader pinpad
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 6.4p1
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P5
Component: Smartcard
Assignee: unassigned-bugs at
2006 Nov 01
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM / C--
...at quote out of context. Hoare is refering to people
who try to optimize their code before making sure that it runs
correctly, not an optimizing compiler (such as LLVM). (Of course, if
you don't want optimizations, simply use -O0 on the command line
during compilation.)
> Will we be able to retarget easily LLVM ?
>
> Has it a sense to retarget a compiler ?
>
Yes of course. It supports C, C++, and Objective-C. It also has many
different back-ends: PowerPC, X86, X86-64, Alpha, ARM, etc. And it has
many target-independent optimizations.
> "In order" or "out of order&qu...