search for: retarget

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 389 matches for "retarget".

2010 Feb 18
1
[LLVMdev] Master's thesis: Retargetable Compiler Backend for Transport Triggered Architectures
Hi all, I think this master's thesis from our group could be of interest. It describes the "bridge" between the LLVM codegen and our custom TTA codegen in TCE: a runtime retargetable architecture description file driven LLVM compiler backend. The thesis might be useful also for people implementing backends for LLVM in general. http://tce.cs.tut.fi/doc/Compiler.pdf If you have any questions or comments, please direct them to me (I'm not the author of this thesis despit...
2013 Oct 08
57
[Bug 2158] New: Race condition in receiving SIGTERM
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2158 Bug ID: 2158 Summary: Race condition in receiving SIGTERM Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.2p1 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: sshd Assignee: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org
2013 Jul 15
0
[LLVMdev] Need compiler retargetted for legacy console system
...n briefly that John Carmack created to make Doom for the system. But he lost that long ago and couldn't release it if he had it still. Now any work to get the main backbone of power out of the systems GPU must be done in time consuming ASM and no one in the community is experienced with retargetting. We are a relatively small community and probably could never raise the 50k+ in a reasonable time that it would cost a pro team to do this for us. We could raise some money but my offer is more for those who are actually learning to do these things and NEED a target that no one has ever...
2006 Nov 01
4
[LLVMdev] LLVM / C--
...all evil." http://www.acm.org/ubiquity/views/v7i24_fallacy.html "That would then force us to choose a versatile target architecture (such as PPC) and minimize architecture-dependent optimizations." http://www.cs.ualberta.ca/~pengzhao/open64-devel/msg00205.html Will we be able to retarget easily LLVM ? Has it a sense to retarget a compiler ? Nowadays, this is the holy grail, if not we will not be able to get rid of legacy architectures ... For example, here is cutting-edge stuff in the embedded design : http://www.sandbridgetech.com/sandbridge_solutions.htm http://www.arc.com/...
2012 Dec 17
15
[Bug 2052] New: Memory leak when SSH login and logout
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2052 Bug ID: 2052 Summary: Memory leak when SSH login and logout Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.1p1 Hardware: MIPS OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: sshd Assignee:
2010 Nov 04
8
[Bug 1833] New: incorrect completion of quoted directory
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1833 Summary: incorrect completion of quoted directory Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.6p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: sftp AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org ReportedBy: djm at
2013 Jan 07
0
[LLVMdev] Retargetting llvm to a simplified X86_64 architecture
Hey guys, I'm trying to implement a simplified X86_64 architecture targeting backend for LLVM. While I have figured that I can introduce the intended architecture as a subtarget of X86 in X86.td, what i don't understand is how the registers specified in X86RegisterInfo.td and the ISA in X86InstrInfo.td are correlated with each sub-architecture. Where are the correlations defined? The
2007 Apr 10
2
[LLVMdev] Using LLVM as a cross compiler without fully retargeting gcc?
We are using LLVM to target a customizable processor architecture. One of the activities to be supported is architecture exploration, where one explores the processor design space (e.g. connectivity, number of FUs) and tries to find a good match for the application at hand. The exploration needs to be relatively rapid, so targeting and compiling gcc for each of the processor variants is not
2007 Apr 10
0
[LLVMdev] Using LLVM as a cross compiler without fully retargeting gcc?
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007, [ISO-8859-1] Pertti Kellom�ki wrote: > Is this correct? If so, can I just grab any one of the targets > supported by gcc, and modify the data sizes etc. to my liking? Yep, that should work. If you just use -emit-llvm all the time, you should be able to use any target GCC supports. > Any technical reasons to avoid or prefer any one of the targets? Not that I can
2018 Mar 26
23
[Bug 2846] New: PermitOpen rule in sshd_config is not case insensitive
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2846 Bug ID: 2846 Summary: PermitOpen rule in sshd_config is not case insensitive Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.6p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: sshd Assignee: unassigned-bugs
2015 Aug 05
27
[Bug 2439] New: New sha256-base64 SSH Fingerprints in openssh-6.8
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2439 Bug ID: 2439 Summary: New sha256-base64 SSH Fingerprints in openssh-6.8 Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.9p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: Miscellaneous Assignee:
2008 Dec 02
12
[Bug 1542] New: Send echo on/off flag to SSH_ASKPASS
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1542 Summary: Send echo on/off flag to SSH_ASKPASS Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org ReportedBy: t8m at
2013 Sep 12
10
[Bug 2152] New: Simplify handling of sftp(1) command flags
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2152 Bug ID: 2152 Summary: Simplify handling of sftp(1) command flags Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: sftp Assignee: unassigned-bugs at
2010 Jul 15
13
[Bug 1798] New: Add fsync() support to sftp/sftp-server
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1798 Summary: Add fsync() support to sftp/sftp-server Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: sftp-server AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org
2009 May 07
13
[Bug 1596] New: Option parser does not permit a double-quote character to occur in option values
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1596 Summary: Option parser does not permit a double-quote character to occur in option values Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.2p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Keywords: low-hanging-fruit Severity: normal Priority: P2
2008 Dec 18
15
[Bug 1545] New: ssh-keygen -R removes all comments from known_hosts file
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1545 Summary: ssh-keygen -R removes all comments from known_hosts file Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.1p1 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ssh-keygen AssignedTo:
2011 Feb 24
7
[Bug 1870] New: Do not show VisualHostKey unless attached to a terminal
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1870 Summary: Do not show VisualHostKey unless attached to a terminal Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.5p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at
2010 Mar 24
11
[Bug 1742] New: sshconnect should use port returned by getaddrinfo
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1742 Summary: sshconnect should use port returned by getaddrinfo Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.4p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org
2013 Dec 16
15
[Bug 2185] New: Allow entering the PIN via reader pinpad
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2185 Bug ID: 2185 Summary: Allow entering the PIN via reader pinpad Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.4p1 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: Smartcard Assignee: unassigned-bugs at
2006 Nov 01
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM / C--
...at quote out of context. Hoare is refering to people who try to optimize their code before making sure that it runs correctly, not an optimizing compiler (such as LLVM). (Of course, if you don't want optimizations, simply use -O0 on the command line during compilation.) > Will we be able to retarget easily LLVM ? > > Has it a sense to retarget a compiler ? > Yes of course. It supports C, C++, and Objective-C. It also has many different back-ends: PowerPC, X86, X86-64, Alpha, ARM, etc. And it has many target-independent optimizations. > "In order" or "out of order&qu...