search for: retaliation

I'll comment from the perspective of someone that is in the Mesa, #dri-devel, #radeon channels myself and have watched their behaviour over the years. This is a real person that spams a load of information into a channel about their understanding of how hardware works. I have no idea what their goal is for spamming this information, could be some desire for acceptance from perceived smartness.

Is the channel now purposefully invite-only? If so, how is one supposed to join? Thanks, Stefan On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 12:23 PM Renato Golin via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 01:03, Ryan Houdek <sonicadvance1 at gmail.com> wrote: > > I'll comment from the perspective of someone that is in the Mesa, > #dri-devel, #radeon

On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 at 15:06, Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I also see little evidence that it would fix the problem of someone > having too much time on their hand and wants to be a nuisance. AFAICS, this is not the problem. The nicks are clearly randomly generated by smashing words together and the content seems to be what comes out of a

...Software Problems (Windows) mlsc5.exe Mollusc 5 (Email privacy/security with PGP) (W95/98/NT) pgpkeyv2.asc Our PGP (V2.6) Public Key pgpkeyv5.asc Our PGP (V5) Public Key sci.exe Spamicide anti-junk mail program (Windows 95/98/NT) spamh.exe Spam Hater junk mail tracing and retaliation program (Windows) t2h101.exe Free Text to HTML program (Windows) emotsprt.exe Database of emotional support resources (Windows) glossi.exe Glossary program explains jargon (Windows 95/98/NT) starrprt.exe Starr report in easy browse format - requires web browser. To get the file y...

There are only two things more annoying on a mailing list than top posting: bottom posting with no trimming of quoted content and all the endless discussions about top posting.

...License 2.0. But Dovecot is licensed under LGPL 2.1; if he takes Dovecot code, modifies it, and mixes it with Alpine, that would not be allowed by the licenses together (as I understand it). The Apache License 2.0 is a permissive, non-copyleft license like the MIT License, but it adds a patent retaliation clause. See http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html for its text and http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html for a short statement of its compatibility with GPLv3; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_License#GPL_compatibility has a little more. License-wise, there are two choi...

This just popped up: > In terms of how native ZFS for Linux is being handled by [KQ > Infotec], they are releasing their ported ZFS code under the Common > Development & Distribution License and will not be attempting to go > for mainline integration. Instead, this company will just be > releasing their CDDL source-code as a build-able kernel module for > users and

The following is a message to be sent to the President of the United States of America. Although we may not be able to do a great deal from where we are, but for the people of America just knowing we care and feel their sadness will help. Please put your name on the following list and send it to all you know and who care. If you are the 100th name and every 100th there on could you please also

Zpool split is a wonderful feature and it seems to work well, and the choice of which disk got which name was perfect! But there seems to be an odd anomaly (at least with b132) . Started with c0t1d0s0 running b132 (root pool is called rpool) Attached c0t0d0s0 and waited for it to resilver Rebooted from c0t0d0s0 zpool split rpool spool Rebooted from c0t0d0s0, both rpool and spool were mounted