search for: ressurecting

It provides a useful starting point, but I agree with Jim that it is not a complete solution and requires rework of the results in a lot cases. I think we could improve it further to address these issues but that work is nontrivial. If you are deciding between a quick and dirty implementation of a custom backend vs. the C backend, then the C backend is sometimes preferable in my experience

I don't know how good it is, but the applications seem obvious. e.g. compiling programs in any of a number of original formats to run natively on CPUs that have a working simple C compiler (maybe only K&R or C89) but don't have an LLVM back end. The source program could be in modern C, C++, or any other high level language or assembly language with a translator to LLVM. On Tue, Aug

I can't see why you'd want to do this, no. -eric On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 8:02 PM, Isaac Dupree < ml at isaac.cedarswampstudios.org> wrote: > Is the C backend at all suitable to be adapted to emit OpenCL code? Or > do the target-dependence, and/or things that C can do but OpenCL can't, > make that hopeless? > -Isaac > > On 08/19/2014 03:08 PM, Carback,

Hi All, 2 of my summer interns (Aimee Dipietro and Greg Simpson) used their time over the summer to resurrect the LLVM C Backend: https://github.com/draperlaboratory/llvm-cbe Improvements include recovery of simple for/while loops (instead of goto), better variable naming, inline asm support, and making it work on a more recent version of llvm. I believe they used the repository here as a

...Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Micah Villmow <micah.villmow at smachines.com > wrote: > That said, changes of this magnitude should be done in a branch instead of > mainline trunk. I strongly disagree. If you think this is the case, we should probably start a new thread (rather than ressurecting this one) with the context of what you want to do and why you think it should be on a branch. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130627/313e4a7d/attachment.html>

...Micah Villmow <micah.villmow at smachines.com<mailto:micah.villmow at smachines.com>> wrote: That said, changes of this magnitude should be done in a branch instead of mainline trunk. I strongly disagree. If you think this is the case, we should probably start a new thread (rather than ressurecting this one) with the context of what you want to do and why you think it should be on a branch. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130627/99c3608d/attachment.html>

...eam format. While just in early stages, this reminded me of a thought that had been passing through my mind before. What formats does Ogg intend to support? I know that there's work on Ogg Tarkin going on. But what about putting a plain wave file into the Ogg framework? Or, even better, ressurecting Ogg Squish. Many people, when posting audio samples, include the Vorbis file (of course) and then a wave file. Then other users tell them to put into flac format, to save space. Why couldn't flac be integrated into Ogg? Since Ogg Squish is dead, what about Ogg Flac? In fact, i seem to...

Outside of what was listed below, which you would have to go back into the other emails/reviews to get into more details, I believe the handling of global constants expressions was problematic with the API's that I had implemented. That said, changes of this magnitude should be done in a branch instead of mainline trunk. Micah -----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu

Hi, I was working on alias analysis using LLVM-2.6 previously. But I just downloaded LLVM-2.7 and found AndersenAA is not there. What happened for andersen's IPA alias analysis? Has it been deleted for some reason? Thanks. Lei -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I have had a problem with mkdiskimage for quite a while. It seems to always exit with the syntax messages. I'm not really familiar enough with Perl to figure out exactly what it's checking for there that it determines is incorrect, but, my guess would have to be that it doesn't like the letter. Eg, I think the last time it suceeded I was running it on sda, but, not I'm typically

Hello all, There is a new Windows package of NUT. It now contains nut-scanner binary. Note that there is a known issue with libupsclient.dll with nut-scanner. The scan of NUT servers using nut-scanner will not work for now. You can find it at : http://www.networkupstools.org/source/2.6/NUT-Installer-2.6.3-1.msi Please send feedback to the list. Regards, Fred -- Team Open Source Eaton -

OpenSSH Developers, I'm researching whether or not OpenSSH is a viable commercial alternative to F-SECURE SSH or SSH.COM's ssh, but I'm not getting the kind of results that I expected from a "Non patent encumbered ssh client". When I attempt to build OpenSSH against an OpenSSL build without rc5, idea, or rsa it bombs since OpenSSL doesn't place the header files in the

This patch implements persistent grants for the xen-blk{front,back} mechanism. The effect of this change is to reduce the number of unmap operations performed, since they cause a (costly) TLB shootdown. This allows the I/O performance to scale better when a large number of VMs are performing I/O. Previously, the blkfront driver was supplied a bvec[] from the request queue. This was granted to