search for: responsibl

I’d like to nominate Quentin Colombet as LSR code owner. He has handled most of the reviews for me for the past couple years (thanks Quentin), and is willing to take on the responsiblity. Frankly, turning over ownership to Quentin is overdue. -Andy

Hi, Consider this code: *** typedef struct _largestruct { char a[1019]; } t_largestruct; extern t_largestruct funclarge(void); int test(void) { char c; c=funclarge().a[0]; c+=funclarge().a[1]; return c; } *** When compiled for Darwin/x86_86 with either Clang or GCC and LLVM 2.7, the frontends (via alloca) and subsequently LLVM (on the cpu stack) allocate two separate temps for the

> On Nov 17, 2016, at 8:51 PM, Andrew Trick via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I’d like to nominate Quentin Colombet as LSR code owner. He has handled most of the reviews for me for the past couple years (thanks Quentin), and is willing to take on the responsiblity. Frankly, turning over ownership to Quentin is overdue. This also seems pretty obvious to me, and other folks seem to agree. Quentin, assuming no objections in the next day, please update CODE_OWNERS, thanks and congrats! -Chris > > -Andy > _________________________________________...

...ve installed x11proto-core-dev, which deprecates 'x-dev', 'cos x-dev is not applicable. Is it possible to edit configure so that it makes use of x11proto instead ? I assume asus 901 has Xandros on it, but some say it is Linpus. Xandros has not replied anything, asus support they have no responsiblity of 3rd party products. Ubuntu is not a choice for me, for other reasons.

...he MCStreamer interface after several days of digging around trying to get a COFF writer working. All fragments should be associated with a symbol. For assembler components, a unnammed "virtual" symbol can be used when there is no explicit label defined. Section assignment should be the responsiblity of the object imlementing the MCStreamer interface, with the caller givin the ability to give hints as to what section to place the symbol into. instead of SwitchSection, there would be BeginSymbol, and SymbolSymbol, it would be illegal to call any EmitXXX function outside of these two calls B...

...their packages (whew!). Gabor Csardi discussed the problems with maintaining a package with lots of dependencies. I maintain the survival package which currently has 246 reverse dependencies and take a slightly different view, which could be described as "the price of fame". I feel a responsiblity to not break R. I have automated scripts which download the latest copy of all 246, using the install-tests option, and run them all. Most updates have 1-3 issues. About 25% of the time it turns out to be a problem that I introduced, and in all the others I have found the other package auth...

On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 05:45:36PM +0200, Guus Sliepen wrote: > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 05:51:30PM +0300, R?zvan Sandu wrote: > > > IMHO, we need: > > > > 1. A proper tinc.service file, included by default (prepackaged) in the > > stock .deb and .rpm packages in Fedora, Debian, Ubuntu, CentOS, etc. > > > > By "proper" I mean it will start

...org/wiki/UpstreamKernelIssues ). I originally intended master-compat as an easy way of installing the Nouveau flavour of DRM modules even on older kernels, because I felt I should share my helper scripts and patches. However, I never intended to do real kernel bug tracking, that was the users' responsiblity. I didn't bring that fact forward well enough and I'm sorry about that. Now I know why no-one else has done this for any of the other drivers. It's drm.git all over again. Also, running the Nouveau DRM with an older kernel is of questionable value when it comes to testing. Why suppo...

...er components, a > unnammed "virtual" symbol can be used when there is no explicit label defined. What do you mean by fragment? Can you give me an analogy with what the syntax looks like in a .s file, I'm not sure exactly what you mean here. > Section assignment should be the responsiblity of the object imlementing the > MCStreamer interface, with the caller givin the ability to give hints as to > what section to place the symbol into. Section assignment really needs to happen at a higher level. The TargetLoweringObjectFile interfaces are the ones responsible for mapping a...

...> > 1. Does asterisk remember the mapping between 192.x.x.x AND > 211.x.x.x:port-number ? It shouldn't. It might see the 192.x.x.x address in the SIP conversations, but even if it did, it would not be able to route the packets back. > 2. When a call to a sip phone, is it asterisk responsiblility to map the > 211.x.x.x:port-number to the 192.x.x.x, and send to the office router ? OR > it is the office router to remeber all the mapping between each sip phone > 192.x.x.x and 211.x.x.x:port-number, and asterisk juts sends the > 211.x.x.x:port-number to the office router ?? As...

...is discussion of a pull request between Jose and Adam: https://github.com/josevalim/active_model_serializers/pull/24 Wondering what the best way to attack this is, and whether any of this is stuff others will run into/whether avoiding circular attributes is something that should be a serializer responsiblity other than the existing circular reference checking that happens already (does it only just check for back reference as I remember seeing vs. keeping track of previously output object_ids? I had to do the latter to avoid them in a previous version of restful_json when I was mutilating as_jso...

...a .s file, I'm not sure exactly what you mean here. > I use the term fragment to refer to the MCFragment class and its derivatives. I understand that to mean any entity representing data in the final linked and loaded form. (something with an address) > Section assignment should be the responsiblity of the object imlementing > the > > MCStreamer interface, with the caller givin the ability to give hints as > to > > what section to place the symbol into. > > Section assignment really needs to happen at a higher level. The > TargetLoweringObjectFile interfaces are...

Would it not make more sense to have this on packagers responsiblity instead like you were saying adding it into the upstream repo. Maybe have a secondary repo that people can contribute to for distribution specific files and install scripts. On 24 September 2015 at 21:30, Guus Sliepen <guus at tinc-vpn.org> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 05:45:36PM...

>Personally, (Just my IMHO) CheckMail should go away. There are too >many different formats and it should not be SSHD's job to understand >them. It's biff and other evil program's responsiblity to do such >things. And IMHO PrintMOTD as well, since both CheckMail and PrintMOTD are often implemented either in a PAM module on some Linux systems or via the global shell profile (/etc/profile, /etc/.login) on others. Getting rid of both of these gets rid of big chunk of code of of sshd...

...t; > Gabor Csardi discussed the problems with maintaining a package with lots > of dependencies. > I maintain the survival package which currently has 246 reverse > dependencies and take a slightly different view, which could be described > as "the price of fame". I feel a responsiblity to not break R. I have > automated scripts which download the latest copy of all 246, using the > install-tests option, and run them all. Most updates have 1-3 issues. > About 25% of the time it turns out to be a problem that I introduced, and > in all the others I have found the o...

Is it possible to have multiple file paths defined for a single module in the fileserver.conf? For example [files] path /first/path/files path /second/path/files allow * [modules] allow * [plugins] allow * The here described configuration did not work as i tried it already. Any idea if this is possible. Thanks a lot Christian -- You received this message because you are

Does this install -d -m0755 -p "/mnt/gen2/TmpDir/portage/app-emulation/xen-pvgrub-4.3.0/image//usr/lib/xen/boot" install -m0644 -p mini-os-x86_32-grub/mini-os.gz "/mnt/gen2/TmpDir/portage/app-emulation/xen-pvgrub-4.3.0/image//usr/lib/xen/boot/pv-grub-x86_32.gz" make: Leaving directory `/mnt/gen2/TmpDir/portage/app-emulation/xen-pvgrub-4.3.0/work/xen-4.3.0/stubdom'

...211.x.x.x:port-number ? >>> >>> It shouldn't. It might see the 192.x.x.x address in the SIP >>> conversations, but even if it did, it would not be able to route the >>> packets back. >>> >>>> 2. When a call to a sip phone, is it asterisk responsiblility to map >>> the >>>> 211.x.x.x:port-number to the 192.x.x.x, and send to the office >>>> router >>> ? OR >>>> it is the office router to remeber all the mapping between each sip >>> phone >>>> 192.x.x.x and 211.x.x.x:po...

(I am not on the rsync mailing list, so if you send a response to this message to the list, please be sure to CC me.) I first reported this bug go Red Hat in <URL:https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65350>. If you run rsync with a subshell through ssh.com's ssh and sshd and then kill the client with ctrl-C, the rsync server process running on the remote machine grows

...address) Ok, MCFragment should definitely be formed behind the MCStreamer implementation. The .s printing implementation of MCStreamer, for example, has no use for it. With the current design, it would be a layering violation to make it earlier. > > > Section assignment should be the responsiblity of the object imlementing the > > MCStreamer interface, with the caller givin the ability to give hints as to > > what section to place the symbol into. > > Section assignment really needs to happen at a higher level. The TargetLoweringObjectFile interfaces are the ones respo...