search for: respecting

Hiya, Probably been debated elsewhere.... I note that R's `data` function does not respect default.stringsAsFactors By my lights, it should, especially as it is documented to call read.table, which DOES respect. Oh, but: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/stringsAsFactors-FALSE-tp921891p921893.html Compelling. I have to agree. So, I change my mind. By my lights, `data` should then be

...d we can easily tell them apart > from newer ones via feature flags. Sorry, don't get the problem. I still don't see how feature flags solve the problem. Suppose we added a feature flag meaning "respects IOMMU". Bad case 1: Build a malicious device that advertises non-IOMMU-respecting virtio. Plug it in behind an IOMMU. Host starts leaking physical addresses to the device (and the device doesn't work, of course). Maybe that's only barely a security problem, but still... Bad case 2: Use current QEMU w/ IOMMU enabled. Assign a virtio device provided by L0 QEMU to L2....

...d we can easily tell them apart > from newer ones via feature flags. Sorry, don't get the problem. I still don't see how feature flags solve the problem. Suppose we added a feature flag meaning "respects IOMMU". Bad case 1: Build a malicious device that advertises non-IOMMU-respecting virtio. Plug it in behind an IOMMU. Host starts leaking physical addresses to the device (and the device doesn't work, of course). Maybe that's only barely a security problem, but still... Bad case 2: Use current QEMU w/ IOMMU enabled. Assign a virtio device provided by L0 QEMU to L2....

  Dear R helpers   Suppose I have two sets of ranges (interest rates) as   Range 1 : (7 – 7.50, 7.50 – 8.50, 8.50 – 10.00) with respective probabilities 0.42, 0.22 and 0.36.     Range II : (11-12, 12-14, 14-21) with respective probabilities 0.14, 0.56 and 0.30 respectively.     My problem is to form the combinations of these ranges in a decreasing order of joint probabilities. It is assumed that

?text says "'adj' allows _adj_ustment of the text with respect to '(x,y)'. Values of 0, 0.5, and 1 specify left/bottom, middle and right/top, respectively." But it looks like 0, 1 specify top, bottom respectively in the y direction. plot(1:4) text(2,2, "adj=c(0,0)", adj=c(0,0)) text(2,2, "adj=c(0,1)", adj=c(0,1), col=2) #the red

Hi Peter, Sorry if I was not clear. Perhaps an example will make my point: > data(iris) > class(iris$Species) [1] "factor" > write.table(iris,'data/myiris.tab') > data(myiris) > class(myiris$Species) [1] "factor" > rm(myiris) > options(stringsAsFactors = FALSE) > data(myiris) > class(myiris$Species) [1] "factor" >

Dear All, How can I sort a data frame with respect to more than one variable? I know that for one variable X one may use: df[order(df$X), ] where df is the data frame containing X. Many thanks, Bernard --------------------------------- [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi, In current git, minimize doesn't respect the PAINT_WINDOW_NO_CORE_INSTANCE_MASK flag set by other plugins. I noticed that especially in group: Tabbed windows are hidden by setting PAINT_WINDOW_NO_CORE_INSTANCE_MASK. When these windows are minimized together with their group, minimize draws its animation regardless if that flag is set or not; with the effect of the hidden windows appearing

Hi, Just to let you know that I have just released a new Rails plug-in called: Respect for Rails. Never feel the need to document your REST API while still developing it because a colleague of yours is making a mobile app client at the same time? If yes, then this gem is for you. You: - describe the structure of your server requests/responses using the compact DSL provided. - mount the engine

UseRs, We are using projection matrices in demographic analyses, and one technique is to calculate partial derivatives of a matrix with respect to a variable appearing in one or more of its elements. For example, consider the matrix A: | a*b a*c | | d d | If I'm not mistaken, the partial derivative of matrix A w/ respect to variable 'a' is the matrix: | b c | | 0 0

On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 6:03 PM, Cook, Malcolm <MEC at stowers.org> wrote: > Hi Peter, > > Sorry if I was not clear. Perhaps an example will make my point: > >> data(iris) >> class(iris$Species) > [1] "factor" >> write.table(iris,'data/myiris.tab') >> data(myiris) >> class(myiris$Species) > [1] "factor" >>

Could somebody share some tips on implementing multivariate integration and partial differentiation in R? For example, for a trivariate joint distribution (cumulative density function) of F(x,y,z), how to differentiate with respect to x and get the bivariate distribution (probability density function) of f(y,z). Or integrate f(x,y,z) with respect to x to get bivariate distribution of (y,z). Your

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 1:50 PM Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > > - Is this trying to change how the community behaves? I think the > resounding > > answer is no, this is very much meant to formalize the existing extremely > > polite and respectful behavior that the LLVM community has had for many > > years. > > This is crucial IMHO

Hello! I have a regular data frame (DATA) with 10 people and 1 column ('variable'). Its cases are people with names ('a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e', 'f', etc.). I would like to write a function that would sum up the values on 'variable' of all possible combinations of people, i.e. 1. I would like to write a loop - in such a way that it

...t;> from newer ones via feature flags. Sorry, don't get the problem. > > I still don't see how feature flags solve the problem. Suppose we > added a feature flag meaning "respects IOMMU". > > Bad case 1: Build a malicious device that advertises > non-IOMMU-respecting virtio. Plug it in behind an IOMMU. Host starts > leaking physical addresses to the device (and the device doesn't work, > of course). Maybe that's only barely a security problem, but still... I don't see right now how critical such a hypothetical case could be. But the OS / i...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The recent anti-social content on the list including threats and support of harassment needs to stop immediately. The CentOS Board will work with the list admins to enforce moderation and if needed removal and bans from the list should people continue this behaviour. This is a large, diverse, and respected community and none of us should need to

What the <bleep> are you on about? data() does many things, only some of which call read.table() et al., and the ones that do have no special treatment of stringsAsFactors. -pd > On 18 Feb 2016, at 21:25 , Cook, Malcolm <MEC at stowers.org> wrote: > > Hiya, > > Probably been debated elsewhere.... > > I note that R's `data` function does not respect

R 3.5.0 Is it intended that the Date method of as.POSIXct does not respect the tz parameter? I suggest changing as.POSIXct.Date to this: function (x, tz = "", ...) .POSIXct(unclass(x) * 86400, tz = tz) Currently, the best workaround seems to be using the character method if one doesn't want the default timezone (which is often an annoying DST timezone). This came up on

Hi all, I find myself sometimes in the situation where I lapply over a list and in the particular function I'd like to use the name and or position of the respective list item. What I usually do is to use mapply on the list and the names of the list / a position list: o <- list(A=1:3, B=1:2, C=1) mapply(function (item, name) paste(name, sum(item), sep="="), o, names(o))

I'm running CVS HEAD. The last time I updated was January 7th, at which time everything was fine. Having updated again today, January 17th, I'm having problems with IAX2. I use the "bindaddr" directive for both SIP and IAX2, and while SIP respects it, IAX2 doesn't. It listens on every interface, and uses every one of them for outgoing source addresses. This breaks IAX2