search for: rerouted

Hi all, Does anyone know, if it's possible to reroute all (i.e. HTTP / FTP / DNS / SMTP / POP3 / IMAP / etc) from an ADSL connected machine via another server, which is currently hosted with IS and has full internet access? i.e. Can I setup another machine, on a different public IP than the dynamic ADSL IP as default gw? OR do I need todo something on that machine to work as a router for

Hi ! I have a E100P and I would like to receive incoming calls on dedicated channels only. Is it possible to answer an incoming call request on channel 2-30 from the Telco with something like 'busy, use channel 1 instead' ? If this is possible, how could it be implemented / configured ? Br / Jan Terje

On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 4:19 PM, zerlgi <zerlgi at gmail.com> wrote: > ?Probably the easiest VPN to set up, but not terribly secure, is VTun. > > If you use (horrors) PPTP, then windows already has a client for it. > .. openVPN also has a nice Windows client that can be run as a service > at startup or called on demand. > .. openVPN supports multiple tunnels (one per .cfg

hello need a little help i have 2 NIC router with shorewall client PCs goes to internet fine with shorewall help. but i need to reroute traffic for one net via other gateway not ISPs. Gateway is on LAN NIC. 192.168.1.0/24 LAN x.x.x.x WAN router(shorewall) IP 192.168.1.15 i need to reroute traffic for 192.168.2.0/24 network to 192.168.1.1 gateway I know how to do it via route and iptables, bu just

Hi, can anyone help me with this problem i''ve got! I have a problem with routing on my Mandrake 7.2 Linux Box i was wondering if you could help me with. I live in Australia and as broadband access isn''t very available at the moment, i have 2 modems to dialup to my isp (dynamic ips assigned) to increase my bandwidth at an affordable level. What currently happens is i have a

I have clients, which connectin to Internet through vpn. I want to dynamically share bandwith between vpn connections, so if there few connections, then they get all bandwith, if more then they get their minimal guaranteed bandwith. my idea is: ip-up.local: tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:2${1/ppp/} htb rate $[$RATEUP/$VPNS]kbit ceil ${RATEUP}kbps tc filter add dev $DEV protocol ip

Hello, everyone! I would like to solve the following problem. Btw, I''m terribly sorry about the pseudo-asciiart, but that''s all I can paint as a tropology. I''m hoping it''ll be enough. ----Internet---- | | | eth0 machine A routing+ipchains eth1 | ------------------ machine B So, given I''m running kernel 2.4.19 and using ipchains

Hi, I've ran into an issue with a PRI provider in a major metropolitan area that I haven't needed to deal with before and I was hoping someone might have some insight on how to handle this within the Asterisk dialplan. At this location users can't always tell if a number is long distance or not (there are a lot of area codes and prefixes in the vicinity). Additionally, users are

I am attempting to forward http requests to my external interface, from internal machines to a machine that is located on the internal interface, via the firewall rules. Externally, I am able to forward the port to the webserver located behind the firewall, and I want to use the same hostname/ip for clients if they are on both sides of the firewall. Note, that I only want to do just the one port,

I''d like Rails to intercept the url''s of html pages in a certain directory so I can embed them in my site. I put them in public/pages and tried to catch them with a route like map.connect ''pages/:pagename'' However this only works if the file does not exist; e.g. "pages/test.html" will only be routed if that file doesn''t exist,

Hi everyone, How do I get the 404.html to use the default layout in app/layouts/application.rhtml? Or is that the wrong question? Should I be rerouting 404 errors to an application controller action, which I can then customize as a 404? Thanks, Sean

HI; Thanks for your reply. The reason for why I am going through asterisk in such case is just "using asterisk voicemail service" I mean: ATA1 calls ATA2, suppose ATA2 is unreachable or he is not at the office, then the call reroute (my GK is able to reroute calls if the first route is not valid) to atersik for voicemail service. Do you think I can handle it with asterisk native

Howdy and sorry 'bout the OT: I'd like to write a script that once a week updated my wine CVS sources for me. There's just one catch: I don't know how to give a response to the passwd for the cvs tree from a script. I checked out the advanced bash scripting at tldp.org, but I couln't get Standard I/O rerouting to do what I wanted. Could someone give me a pointer, or point me

...T My internal net |-----|___| / \NAT / \ / ISP2 However, my interfaces which these lines are connected are both using NAT. My question is; will TCP connections that NAT.ed over interface ISP1 break if a failover happens and rerouted over ISP2?? Lars _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

I just installed pre 9 of kernel 2.2.0. I am now getting echoed to the screen of whatever virtual terminal I am in the following message: 172.16.81.99 sent an invalid ICMP error to a broadcast This is repeated for a number of IP addresses. Obviously, the problem is two fold. Firstly I need to find out what the problem is with the servers. However, I find it somewhat annoying to having this

...wever I found an issue. I had to track down an issue today: Packet from a local machine didn''t get routed to the internet. After long searching I found the issue: The TCP-Segmentation-offloading assembles fragments with Do Not Fragment set. This introduces issues when the packet is to be rerouted trough a router. Situation: DOM0 |->Bridge 1 - MTU 1500 | |-> PHY - eth0 | |-> VIF - Dom1 | \-> VIF - Dom2 (router) | \->Bridge 2 - MTU 1500 |-> PHY - eth1 \-> VIF - Dom2 (router) Dom 1 <-> VIF <--(bridge 1)--> VIF <-> dom...

The Asterisk Development Team has announced the release of version 1.4.11 of libpri. This release is available for immediate download at http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/libpri/ This release contains many fixes and new features, among them being: 1.) Support for NT-PTMP BRI links, including support for multiple TEIs and connecting of BRI phones. 2.) Support for allowing persistent

The Asterisk Development Team has announced the release of version 1.4.11 of libpri. This release is available for immediate download at http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/libpri/ This release contains many fixes and new features, among them being: 1.) Support for NT-PTMP BRI links, including support for multiple TEIs and connecting of BRI phones. 2.) Support for allowing persistent

i would like to carry some oversea pstn-destinations via sip to providers like stanaphone, however, in case of a network-failure or if the provider is not available, i want to fallback to the zap-channels so the call is carried out to the pstn directly. the usual approach would be to check the dialstatus(e.g.NOANSWER). however, asterisk tries >60seconds to reach that peer(even when the ip

...cted and also that the linux box shall add latency on all packets going through. Another "Wish/Feature" is that from the test client, it shall be possible to send the Web Request against any of the incoming interfaces with a PORT specification, for instance 192.168.4.1:8080 and it will be rerouted to192.168.100.1:8080 with the added latency and bandwidth restriction. Am i completely lost here, or is it so that this is possible to do in Linux ?? Best Regards Jonas Persson, Performance Analyst _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http:/...