search for: reroute

Hi all, Does anyone know, if it's possible to reroute all (i.e. HTTP / FTP / DNS / SMTP / POP3 / IMAP / etc) from an ADSL connected machine via another server, which is currently hosted with IS and has full internet access? i.e. Can I setup another machine, on a different public IP than the dynamic ADSL IP as default gw? OR do I need todo something...

Hi ! I have a E100P and I would like to receive incoming calls on dedicated channels only. Is it possible to answer an incoming call request on channel 2-30 from the Telco with something like 'busy, use channel 1 instead' ? If this is possible, how could it be implemented / configured ? Br / Jan Terje

On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 4:19 PM, zerlgi <zerlgi at gmail.com> wrote: > ?Probably the easiest VPN to set up, but not terribly secure, is VTun. > > If you use (horrors) PPTP, then windows already has a client for it. > .. openVPN also has a nice Windows client that can be run as a service > at startup or called on demand. > .. openVPN supports multiple tunnels (one per .cfg

hello need a little help i have 2 NIC router with shorewall client PCs goes to internet fine with shorewall help. but i need to reroute traffic for one net via other gateway not ISPs. Gateway is on LAN NIC. 192.168.1.0/24 LAN x.x.x.x WAN router(shorewall) IP 192.168.1.15 i need to reroute traffic for 192.168.2.0/24 network to 192.168.1.1 gateway I know how to do it via route and iptables, bu just cant understand how to do it shore...

Hi, can anyone help me with this problem i''ve got! I have a problem with routing on my Mandrake 7.2 Linux Box i was wondering if you could help me with. I live in Australia and as broadband access isn''t very available at the moment, i have 2 modems to dialup to my isp (dynamic ips assigned) to increase my bandwidth at an affordable level. What currently happens is i have a

...ps tc filter del dev $DEV protocol ip parent 1:0 prio 1 u32 match ip src $5 flowid 1:2${1/ppp/} where $DEV is server''s outgoing interface, $RATEUP is outgoing bandwith and $VPNS is maximum possible vpn connections. maybe there is more better method? and what to do with incomming traffic? reroute it on imq? and as I understand there is can''t be a transparent proxy? please help p.s. sorry for my english.... Smile -- Denis Kot denis?jabber.org.by ICQ: 13680126 Mobil: +375 29 6-1234-78 _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http...

...y. I''m hoping it''ll be enough. ----Internet---- | | | eth0 machine A routing+ipchains eth1 | ------------------ machine B So, given I''m running kernel 2.4.19 and using ipchains (don''t ask me why, but I''m bounded to this config), I would like to reroute everything that''s passing thru eth1 on machine A from the internal lan and has dport XXXX to the same port on machine B. The hole thing has to be completely transparent. I tried some "advanced routing" stuff, like marking those packets with fwmark and building a separate routing...

...redirected to a message (by the provider) saying 'You do not need to dial a one or zero...' and the message repeats indefinitely. I'd like to figure out how to handle this in the dial plan so users do not even know anything happened. To test to see if I could stop the call progress and reroute it I've tried this so far: exten => _NXXXXXXXXX,1,Set(GROUP(default)=dialpool) exten => _NXXXXXXXXX,2,GotoIf($[${GROUP_COUNT(priout at default)}<19]?5) exten => _NXXXXXXXXX,3,GotoIf($[${GROUP_COUNT(congest at default)}>18]?BLOCK) exten => _NXXXXXXXXX,4,NoOp exten => _NXXXX...

I am attempting to forward http requests to my external interface, from internal machines to a machine that is located on the internal interface, via the firewall rules. Externally, I am able to forward the port to the webserver located behind the firewall, and I want to use the same hostname/ip for clients if they are on both sides of the firewall. Note, that I only want to do just the one port,

...ied to catch them with a route like map.connect ''pages/:pagename'' However this only works if the file does not exist; e.g. "pages/test.html" will only be routed if that file doesn''t exist, otherwise it will just show the file. Is there any other way I can reroute url''s of existing html files? The reason I need to use the real directory and file names is that these html pages contain images and cross-links which still need to work. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi everyone, How do I get the 404.html to use the default layout in app/layouts/application.rhtml? Or is that the wrong question? Should I be rerouting 404 errors to an application controller action, which I can then customize as a 404? Thanks, Sean

HI; Thanks for your reply. The reason for why I am going through asterisk in such case is just "using asterisk voicemail service" I mean: ATA1 calls ATA2, suppose ATA2 is unreachable or he is not at the office, then the call reroute (my GK is able to reroute calls if the first route is not valid) to atersik for voicemail service. Do you think I can handle it with asterisk native h323 channel???????/ Regards; mohammad ----- Original Message ----- From: "administrator tootai" <admin@tootai.net> To: "m...

Howdy and sorry 'bout the OT: I'd like to write a script that once a week updated my wine CVS sources for me. There's just one catch: I don't know how to give a response to the passwd for the cvs tree from a script. I checked out the advanced bash scripting at tldp.org, but I couln't get Standard I/O rerouting to do what I wanted. Could someone give me a pointer, or point me

...T My internal net |-----|___| / \NAT / \ / ISP2 However, my interfaces which these lines are connected are both using NAT. My question is; will TCP connections that NAT.ed over interface ISP1 break if a failover happens and rerouted over ISP2?? Lars _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

...vers. However, I find it somewhat annoying to having this pop up on the screen when I am in the middle of doing something. I also noticed that if I stop Samba (v2.0.0), the message goes away. The messages also go away if I go back to kernel 2.0.36. Anyone have any hints on how I can suppress or reroute the message and still run Samba v2.0.0 and kernel 2.2.0 pre9? Thanks in advance for any assistance. Regards - Bob Kruger

...wever I found an issue. I had to track down an issue today: Packet from a local machine didn''t get routed to the internet. After long searching I found the issue: The TCP-Segmentation-offloading assembles fragments with Do Not Fragment set. This introduces issues when the packet is to be rerouted trough a router. Situation: DOM0 |->Bridge 1 - MTU 1500 | |-> PHY - eth0 | |-> VIF - Dom1 | \-> VIF - Dom2 (router) | \->Bridge 2 - MTU 1500 |-> PHY - eth1 \-> VIF - Dom2 (router) Dom 1 <-> VIF <--(bridge 1)--> VIF <-> do...

The Asterisk Development Team has announced the release of version 1.4.11 of libpri. This release is available for immediate download at http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/libpri/ This release contains many fixes and new features, among them being: 1.) Support for NT-PTMP BRI links, including support for multiple TEIs and connecting of BRI phones. 2.) Support for allowing persistent

The Asterisk Development Team has announced the release of version 1.4.11 of libpri. This release is available for immediate download at http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/libpri/ This release contains many fixes and new features, among them being: 1.) Support for NT-PTMP BRI links, including support for multiple TEIs and connecting of BRI phones. 2.) Support for allowing persistent

...). i could limit a call by setting a timeout but this limit would also apply if a final destination doesn't pick up within the timeout. so basically, when i send a call via a sip-channel, i would like to know the network-status of the foreign host immediately(at least within 5 seconds) so i can reroute the call without having to wait for a host that is probably dead... this seems to be possible with iax and CHANUNAVAIL, (http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=3360&history=1), though i haven't tried it. also i _need_ to use sip, iax (currently) is not an option. is ther...

...cted and also that the linux box shall add latency on all packets going through. Another "Wish/Feature" is that from the test client, it shall be possible to send the Web Request against any of the incoming interfaces with a PORT specification, for instance 192.168.4.1:8080 and it will be rerouted to192.168.100.1:8080 with the added latency and bandwidth restriction. Am i completely lost here, or is it so that this is possible to do in Linux ?? Best Regards Jonas Persson, Performance Analyst _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http:...