search for: requeueu

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "requeueu".

Did you mean: requeued
2014 Nov 20
2
[PATCH v3] virtio_balloon: Convert "vballoon" kthread into a workqueue
...> > workqueue with a pending work item on it. destroy_workqueue() will > > try to drain the target wq, warn if it doesn't finish in certain > > number of iterations and just keep trying indefinitely. > > > > Thanks. > > Right, so eventually we'll stop requeueuing and it will succeed? Yeah, sure, it's a silly reason to use a separate workqueue tho. Don't do it that way. Thanks. -- tejun
2014 Nov 20
2
[PATCH v3] virtio_balloon: Convert "vballoon" kthread into a workqueue
...> > workqueue with a pending work item on it. destroy_workqueue() will > > try to drain the target wq, warn if it doesn't finish in certain > > number of iterations and just keep trying indefinitely. > > > > Thanks. > > Right, so eventually we'll stop requeueuing and it will succeed? Yeah, sure, it's a silly reason to use a separate workqueue tho. Don't do it that way. Thanks. -- tejun
2014 Nov 20
4
[PATCH v3] virtio_balloon: Convert "vballoon" kthread into a workqueue
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 06:26:24PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 06:25:43PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 11:07:46AM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 05:03:17PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote: > > > ... > > > > @@ -476,7 +460,6 @@ static void virtballoon_remove(struct virtio_device
2014 Nov 20
4
[PATCH v3] virtio_balloon: Convert "vballoon" kthread into a workqueue
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 06:26:24PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 06:25:43PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 11:07:46AM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 05:03:17PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote: > > > ... > > > > @@ -476,7 +460,6 @@ static void virtballoon_remove(struct virtio_device
2014 Nov 20
0
[PATCH v3] virtio_balloon: Convert "vballoon" kthread into a workqueue
...or that. You can't shut down a > workqueue with a pending work item on it. destroy_workqueue() will > try to drain the target wq, warn if it doesn't finish in certain > number of iterations and just keep trying indefinitely. > > Thanks. Right, so eventually we'll stop requeueuing and it will succeed? > -- > tejun