Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "requeueu".
Did you mean:
requeued
2014 Nov 20
2
[PATCH v3] virtio_balloon: Convert "vballoon" kthread into a workqueue
...> > workqueue with a pending work item on it. destroy_workqueue() will
> > try to drain the target wq, warn if it doesn't finish in certain
> > number of iterations and just keep trying indefinitely.
> >
> > Thanks.
>
> Right, so eventually we'll stop requeueuing and it will succeed?
Yeah, sure, it's a silly reason to use a separate workqueue tho.
Don't do it that way.
Thanks.
--
tejun
2014 Nov 20
2
[PATCH v3] virtio_balloon: Convert "vballoon" kthread into a workqueue
...> > workqueue with a pending work item on it. destroy_workqueue() will
> > try to drain the target wq, warn if it doesn't finish in certain
> > number of iterations and just keep trying indefinitely.
> >
> > Thanks.
>
> Right, so eventually we'll stop requeueuing and it will succeed?
Yeah, sure, it's a silly reason to use a separate workqueue tho.
Don't do it that way.
Thanks.
--
tejun
2014 Nov 20
4
[PATCH v3] virtio_balloon: Convert "vballoon" kthread into a workqueue
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 06:26:24PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 06:25:43PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 11:07:46AM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 05:03:17PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > > ...
> > > > @@ -476,7 +460,6 @@ static void virtballoon_remove(struct virtio_device
2014 Nov 20
4
[PATCH v3] virtio_balloon: Convert "vballoon" kthread into a workqueue
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 06:26:24PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 06:25:43PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 11:07:46AM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 05:03:17PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > > ...
> > > > @@ -476,7 +460,6 @@ static void virtballoon_remove(struct virtio_device
2014 Nov 20
0
[PATCH v3] virtio_balloon: Convert "vballoon" kthread into a workqueue
...or that. You can't shut down a
> workqueue with a pending work item on it. destroy_workqueue() will
> try to drain the target wq, warn if it doesn't finish in certain
> number of iterations and just keep trying indefinitely.
>
> Thanks.
Right, so eventually we'll stop requeueuing and it will succeed?
> --
> tejun