search for: repushed

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "repushed".

Did you mean: pushed
2007 Jan 18
7
CRITICAL - DB Adapters - Syntax Errors
Anyone else notice that changeset 5980[1] hosed several of the db adapters? Specifically: activerecord/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/frontbase_adapter.rb activerecord/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/mysql_adapter.rb activerecord/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/openbase_adapter.rb activerecord/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/oracle_adapter.rb Someone has already filed
2016 Jun 08
3
Intended behavior of CGSCC pass manager.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID On Jun 8, 2016 1:58 PM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com<mailto:mehdi.amini at apple.com>> wrote: > > >> On Jun 8, 2016, at 9:32 AM, Hal Finkel via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >> >> >> ________________________________ >>> >>>
2009 Feb 11
0
Compiz "core" repository
Greetings, I'm pleased to announce that the compiz "core" repository has been moved from Freedesktop to the Compiz server. You'll find it at : git://git.compiz-fusion.org/compiz/core A few changes were made on the branches : * the former master is now compiz-legacy * the compiz++ branch was move to master * the compiz++ branch is still there, but just for legacy Some commits
2011 Apr 28
1
libvirt security update CVE-2011-1146
Hello, I have seen that package libvirt-0.8.2-15.el5_6.3 on CentOS 5.6 which addresses CVE-2011-1146 <https://www.redhat.com/security/data/cve/CVE-2011-1146.html> vulnerability is not yet available while for example it is on Scientific Linux. Is there any particular reason why the above rpm update is still not available on mirrors ? thank you Rick -------------- next part
2016 Jun 08
2
Intended behavior of CGSCC pass manager.
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Sanjoy Das via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi, > > Does it make sense to change RefSCCs to hold a list of > RefSCC-DAG-Roots that were split out of it because of edge deletion? > Then one way to phrase the inliner/function pass iteration would be > (assuming I understand the issues): > >