Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "repushed".
Did you mean:
pushed
2007 Jan 18
7
CRITICAL - DB Adapters - Syntax Errors
Anyone else notice that changeset 5980[1] hosed several of the db
adapters?
Specifically:
activerecord/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/frontbase_adapter.rb
activerecord/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/mysql_adapter.rb
activerecord/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/openbase_adapter.rb
activerecord/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/oracle_adapter.rb
Someone has already filed
2016 Jun 08
3
Intended behavior of CGSCC pass manager.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID
On Jun 8, 2016 1:58 PM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com<mailto:mehdi.amini at apple.com>> wrote:
>
>
>> On Jun 8, 2016, at 9:32 AM, Hal Finkel via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>>>
>>>
2009 Feb 11
0
Compiz "core" repository
Greetings,
I'm pleased to announce that the compiz "core" repository has been moved from
Freedesktop to the Compiz server.
You'll find it at : git://git.compiz-fusion.org/compiz/core
A few changes were made on the branches :
* the former master is now compiz-legacy
* the compiz++ branch was move to master
* the compiz++ branch is still there, but just for legacy
Some commits
2011 Apr 28
1
libvirt security update CVE-2011-1146
Hello,
I have seen that package libvirt-0.8.2-15.el5_6.3 on CentOS 5.6 which
addresses CVE-2011-1146
<https://www.redhat.com/security/data/cve/CVE-2011-1146.html> vulnerability
is not yet available while for example it is on Scientific Linux.
Is there any particular reason why the above rpm update is still not
available on mirrors ?
thank you
Rick
-------------- next part
2016 Jun 08
2
Intended behavior of CGSCC pass manager.
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Sanjoy Das via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does it make sense to change RefSCCs to hold a list of
> RefSCC-DAG-Roots that were split out of it because of edge deletion?
> Then one way to phrase the inliner/function pass iteration would be
> (assuming I understand the issues):
>
>