search for: repurposes

Hi all, Don''t suppose there''s an IRC bot I can use (or repurpose) for cc.rb notifications? Will.

It's that time again. I'm stuck with a bunch of older Powermac G4's that I either need to repurpose or give the heave ho. I've not tried CentOS on Mac hardware before. Would the following config be suitable for a (somewhat slow) workstation? PowerMac G4 400mhz 256mb RAM 40gig ATA disk Some sort of dual-head ATI video setup with 64mb VRAM (I've forgotten which cards they

So I'm in a bit of a pickle ... I have a machine that needs to be repurposed from WinXP to CentOS. I downloaded the CentOS DVD and all then realized ... I don't have a keyboard/mouse for the machine. It only has USB ports on it, and I don't have a single available USB keyboard that I can plug in. Bit of a problem. Usually what I do is install via VNC anyway, but that is contingent

Hi there, I'm trying to repurpose an unused machine (athlon XP 3000+) for my young daughter to use. It's on a motherboard with a VIA KT880 chipset and VIA integrated soundcard (VIA 8237). The card seems to be detected during boot time and shows up in the system log, but when I try to actually use the sound card within Gnome, there's no sound. The device is detected, but

Hi, Thanks for the pointers. My patch now calls the attribute "noduplicate", and updates CodeMetrics to have another field: bool notDuplicatable; Which semantically is "containsIndirectBr || containsNoDuplicateInst". I didn't repurpose containsIndirectBr because I felt what I'm looking for is sufficiently different (indirectbr inhibits inlining, whereas noduplicate

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 03:20:25PM +0530, Karthik Subrahmanya wrote: > If you want to use the first two bricks as arbiter, then you need to be > aware of the following things: > - Your distribution count will be decreased to 2. What's the significance of this? I'm trying to find documentation on distribution counts in gluster, but my google-fu is failing me. > - Your data on

> We seem to have some agreement that two formats for instrumentation > based profiling is worthwhile. These are that emitted by compiler-rt in > the instrumented program at runtime (format 1), and that which is > consumed by clang when compiling the program with PGO (format 2). > > Format 1 > -------- > > This format should be efficient to write, since the

On Jun 18, 2014, at 8:38 PM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith <dexonsmith at apple.com> wrote: >> >> On 2014 Jun 18, at 13:29, Owen Anderson <resistor at mac.com> wrote: >> >> Numerical analysis is hard. Every numerics expert I have ever worked with considers trying to re-invent floating point a cardinal sin of numerical analysis. Just don’t do it. You will miss

Hi Greg, I'm afraid I've not looked into the infrastructure Jim put into place, so I've not really been able to answer the "how should I do it" questions, but hopefully I can comment on the ABI. > And probably questions for Tim, are these "section-relative" mapping > symbols, as defined in 4.6.5.1 of the ELF for ARM document? Yes, they are. > And what

On Dec 3, 2012, at 9:48 AM, James Molloy <James.Molloy at arm.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for the pointers. My patch now calls the attribute "noduplicate", > and updates CodeMetrics to have another field: > > bool notDuplicatable; > > Which semantically is "containsIndirectBr || containsNoDuplicateInst". I > didn't repurpose

I would like to have tags mandatory in my app. The following keeps giving me error that params is nill. def validate() if (@params[:tags]) errors.add(@params[:tags], ":tags must be entered ") end end Why cannot I access params in my model class? The field for tags is called "tags" How else can I add an error using errors.add? I

Am Do., 8. Nov. 2018 um 10:36 Uhr schrieb David Greene <dag at cray.com>: > What about load prefetching vs. non-temporal stores on X86? There's a > limited number of write-combining buffers but prefetches "just" use the > regular load paths. Yes, there's a limited number of load buffers but I > would expect the the number of independent prefetch streams one

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 4:18 PM, Dave Sherohman <dave at sherohman.org> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 03:20:25PM +0530, Karthik Subrahmanya wrote: > > If you want to use the first two bricks as arbiter, then you need to be > > aware of the following things: > > - Your distribution count will be decreased to 2. > > What's the significance of this? I'm

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 12:00:29PM +0530, Karthik Subrahmanya wrote: > I will try to explain how you can end up in split-brain even with cluster > wide quorum: Yep, the explanation made sense. I hadn't considered the possibility of alternating outages. Thanks! > > > It would be great if you can consider configuring an arbiter or > > > replica 3 volume. > >

Hi there. I got myself a pair of old Intel Xeon blades, which I plan to repurpose with CentOS. The model is : HP bl20p-g3 server blade Manual http://h18004.www1.hp.com/products/quickspecs/12322_ca/12322_ca.pdf Now, the main problem with this hardware is that LVD UW SCSI HDDs are hard to find and hella expensive if you find em (and of reduced capacity). Any of you know: 1. If there's any

Hi, TL;DR r317488 changed the way fast math flags are laid out in the bitcode and anyone compiling a pre-llvm-6.0 bitcode with llvm-6.0 will lose all the optimizations guarded by isFast and a pre-llvm-6.0 compiler compiling a llvm-6.0 bitcode will potentially generate incorrect code w.r.t. fast math expectations. Should we bump the bitcode version because of that and have the autoupgrader

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 04:59:36PM +0530, Karthik Subrahmanya wrote: > > > Since arbiter bricks need not be of same size as the data bricks, if you > > > can configure three more arbiter bricks > > > based on the guidelines in the doc [1], you can do it live and you will > > > have the distribution count also unchanged. > > > > I can probably find

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 05:45:27PM +0530, Karthik Subrahmanya wrote: > > "In a replica 2 volume... If we set the client-quorum option to > > auto, then the first brick must always be up, irrespective of the > > status of the second brick. If only the second brick is up, the > > subvolume becomes read-only." > > > By default client-quorum is

...tely are strong advantages to using one datastructure to represent multiple levels of IR: you have less code in the compiler, more shared concepts, etc. I have seen and work with several compilers that tried to do this. Even GCC does this (in the opposite direction) with "treessa" which repurposes some front-end data structures for their mid-level IR. While there are advantages, it also means that you get fewer invariants, and that the data structures are a worse fit for each level. To give you one simple example: LLVM IR is simplified greatly based on the assumption that it is always in S...

On Sep 13, 2011, at 1:05 AM, Eli Bendersky wrote: >> So where should I look for adding such support? Is MC JIT the direction? Does it purport to emit DWARF as well as executable code? Any pointers to relevant places in the code would be most appreciated. >> > > MC JIT is the direction that the JIT will be going in the future. Right now any debugging emission is minimal at