search for: repurpose

Hi all, Don''t suppose there''s an IRC bot I can use (or repurpose) for cc.rb notifications? Will.

It's that time again. I'm stuck with a bunch of older Powermac G4's that I either need to repurpose or give the heave ho. I've not tried CentOS on Mac hardware before. Would the following config be suitable for a (somewhat slow) workstation? PowerMac G4 400mhz 256mb RAM 40gig ATA disk Some sort of dual-head ATI video setup with 64mb VRAM (I've forgotten which cards they are) Cheers...

So I'm in a bit of a pickle ... I have a machine that needs to be repurposed from WinXP to CentOS. I downloaded the CentOS DVD and all then realized ... I don't have a keyboard/mouse for the machine. It only has USB ports on it, and I don't have a single available USB keyboard that I can plug in. Bit of a problem. Usually what I do is install via VNC anyway, bu...

Hi there, I'm trying to repurpose an unused machine (athlon XP 3000+) for my young daughter to use. It's on a motherboard with a VIA KT880 chipset and VIA integrated soundcard (VIA 8237). The card seems to be detected during boot time and shows up in the system log, but when I try to actually use the sound card within Gno...

Hi, Thanks for the pointers. My patch now calls the attribute "noduplicate", and updates CodeMetrics to have another field: bool notDuplicatable; Which semantically is "containsIndirectBr || containsNoDuplicateInst". I didn't repurpose containsIndirectBr because I felt what I'm looking for is sufficiently different (indirectbr inhibits inlining, whereas noduplicate does not, if there is one call site). I still need to ensure InlineCost is correct; patch will be incoming tomorrow morning. All uses use CodeMetrics, except for...

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 03:20:25PM +0530, Karthik Subrahmanya wrote: > If you want to use the first two bricks as arbiter, then you need to be > aware of the following things: > - Your distribution count will be decreased to 2. What's the significance of this? I'm trying to find documentation on distribution counts in gluster, but my google-fu is failing me. > - Your data on

> We seem to have some agreement that two formats for instrumentation > based profiling is worthwhile. These are that emitted by compiler-rt in > the instrumented program at runtime (format 1), and that which is > consumed by clang when compiling the program with PGO (format 2). > > Format 1 > -------- > > This format should be efficient to write, since the

On Jun 18, 2014, at 8:38 PM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith <dexonsmith at apple.com> wrote: >> >> On 2014 Jun 18, at 13:29, Owen Anderson <resistor at mac.com> wrote: >> >> Numerical analysis is hard. Every numerics expert I have ever worked with considers trying to re-invent floating point a cardinal sin of numerical analysis. Just don’t do it. You will miss

...as defined in 4.6.5.1 of the ELF for ARM document? Yes, they are. > And what to put in the alignment field? I see GCC outputting 1, 3, 4, but I don't see a > description of that field in the doc. I don't think individual symbols have an alignment in ELF (except COMMON ones, which repurpose the st_value field -- not the case here). If the 1, 3, 4 are coming from the last column of the dumps you produced below, they're referring to the section the symbol is relative to (st_shndx in the documentation). Cheers. Tim.

...> Hi, > > Thanks for the pointers. My patch now calls the attribute "noduplicate", > and updates CodeMetrics to have another field: > > bool notDuplicatable; > > Which semantically is "containsIndirectBr || containsNoDuplicateInst". I > didn't repurpose containsIndirectBr because I felt what I'm looking for > is sufficiently different (indirectbr inhibits inlining, whereas > noduplicate does not, if there is one call site). I'm pretty sure that it's fine to inline indirectbr if there is a single call site and the inlinee is to b...

...r checks for timeout array boundaries expr: immediate: check for chain attribute to release chain name udata: incorrect userdata buffer size validation utils: remove unused code Phil Sutter (24): set: Do not leave free'd expr_list elements in place tests: Fix objref test case expr: Repurpose struct expr_ops::max_attr field expr: Call expr_ops::set with legal types only include: Sync nf_log.h with kernel headers expr: Introduce struct expr_ops::attr_policy expr: Enforce attr_policy compliance in nftnl_expr_set() chain: Validate NFTNL_CHAIN_USE, too table: Validate NFTNL_TABL...

I would like to have tags mandatory in my app. The following keeps giving me error that params is nill. def validate() if (@params[:tags]) errors.add(@params[:tags], ":tags must be entered ") end end Why cannot I access params in my model class? The field for tags is called "tags" How else can I add an error using errors.add? I

Am Do., 8. Nov. 2018 um 10:36 Uhr schrieb David Greene <dag at cray.com>: > What about load prefetching vs. non-temporal stores on X86? There's a > limited number of write-combining buffers but prefetches "just" use the > regular load paths. Yes, there's a limited number of load buffers but I > would expect the the number of independent prefetch streams one

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 4:18 PM, Dave Sherohman <dave at sherohman.org> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 03:20:25PM +0530, Karthik Subrahmanya wrote: > > If you want to use the first two bricks as arbiter, then you need to be > > aware of the following things: > > - Your distribution count will be decreased to 2. > > What's the significance of this? I'm

...e quorum: Yep, the explanation made sense. I hadn't considered the possibility of alternating outages. Thanks! > > > It would be great if you can consider configuring an arbiter or > > > replica 3 volume. > > > > I can. My bricks are 2x850G and 4x11T, so I can repurpose the small > > bricks as arbiters with minimal effect on capacity. What would be the > > sequence of commands needed to: > > > > 1) Move all data off of bricks 1 & 2 > > 2) Remove that replica from the cluster > > 3) Re-add those two bricks as arbiters > &...

Hi there. I got myself a pair of old Intel Xeon blades, which I plan to repurpose with CentOS. The model is : HP bl20p-g3 server blade Manual http://h18004.www1.hp.com/products/quickspecs/12322_ca/12322_ca.pdf Now, the main problem with this hardware is that LVD UW SCSI HDDs are hard to find and hella expensive if you find em (and of reduced capacity). Any of you know: 1. If...

...st-r317488 compiler is going to skip any optimization guarded by isFast for all pre-r317488 bitcode file (remember the afn bit is not set here) 2. a pre-r317488 compiler is going to run any optimization guarded by unsafeAlgebra for any post-r317488 bitcode file that has the reassoc bit (remember we repurposed UnsafeMath) Scenario #2 might be unlikely but we’re potentially breaking the semantic of the program. It is particularly dangerous because there is nothing that is going to tell us that we are in this situation “downgrade" situation. #1 means that any code that uses unsafeMath is going to ge...

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 04:59:36PM +0530, Karthik Subrahmanya wrote: > > > Since arbiter bricks need not be of same size as the data bricks, if you > > > can configure three more arbiter bricks > > > based on the guidelines in the doc [1], you can do it live and you will > > > have the distribution count also unchanged. > > > > I can probably find

...e not in (cluster-wide) quorum refuse to accept writes? I'm not seeing the reason for using individual subvolume quorums instead of full-volume quorum. > It would be great if you can consider configuring an arbiter or > replica 3 volume. I can. My bricks are 2x850G and 4x11T, so I can repurpose the small bricks as arbiters with minimal effect on capacity. What would be the sequence of commands needed to: 1) Move all data off of bricks 1 & 2 2) Remove that replica from the cluster 3) Re-add those two bricks as arbiters (And did I miss any additional steps?) Unfortunately, I've...

...tely are strong advantages to using one datastructure to represent multiple levels of IR: you have less code in the compiler, more shared concepts, etc. I have seen and work with several compilers that tried to do this. Even GCC does this (in the opposite direction) with "treessa" which repurposes some front-end data structures for their mid-level IR. While there are advantages, it also means that you get fewer invariants, and that the data structures are a worse fit for each level. To give you one simple example: LLVM IR is simplified greatly based on the assumption that it is always in...