search for: repurposed

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 176 matches for "repurposed".

Did you mean: repurpose
2008 May 20
3
IRC bot for cc.rb?
Hi all, Don''t suppose there''s an IRC bot I can use (or repurpose) for cc.rb notifications? Will.
2006 May 17
4
G4-400mhz enough for CentOS 4.3?
It's that time again. I'm stuck with a bunch of older Powermac G4's that I either need to repurpose or give the heave ho. I've not tried CentOS on Mac hardware before. Would the following config be suitable for a (somewhat slow) workstation? PowerMac G4 400mhz 256mb RAM 40gig ATA disk Some sort of dual-head ATI video setup with 64mb VRAM (I've forgotten which cards they
2013 Dec 17
4
Headless system
So I'm in a bit of a pickle ... I have a machine that needs to be repurposed from WinXP to CentOS. I downloaded the CentOS DVD and all then realized ... I don't have a keyboard/mouse for the machine. It only has USB ports on it, and I don't have a single available USB keyboard that I can plug in. Bit of a problem. Usually what I do is install via VNC anyway, but...
2005 Oct 23
2
Strange soundcard problem w/4.2
Hi there, I'm trying to repurpose an unused machine (athlon XP 3000+) for my young daughter to use. It's on a motherboard with a VIA KT880 chipset and VIA integrated soundcard (VIA 8237). The card seems to be detected during boot time and shows up in the system log, but when I try to actually use the sound card within Gnome, there's no sound. The device is detected, but
2012 Dec 03
2
[LLVMdev] [RFC] "noclone" function attribute
Hi, Thanks for the pointers. My patch now calls the attribute "noduplicate", and updates CodeMetrics to have another field: bool notDuplicatable; Which semantically is "containsIndirectBr || containsNoDuplicateInst". I didn't repurpose containsIndirectBr because I felt what I'm looking for is sufficiently different (indirectbr inhibits inlining, whereas noduplicate
2018 Feb 27
2
Quorum in distributed-replicate volume
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 03:20:25PM +0530, Karthik Subrahmanya wrote: > If you want to use the first two bricks as arbiter, then you need to be > aware of the following things: > - Your distribution count will be decreased to 2. What's the significance of this? I'm trying to find documentation on distribution counts in gluster, but my google-fu is failing me. > - Your data on
2014 Mar 24
2
[LLVMdev] RFC: Binary format for instrumentation based profiling data
> We seem to have some agreement that two formats for instrumentation > based profiling is worthwhile. These are that emitted by compiler-rt in > the instrumented program at runtime (format 1), and that which is > consumed by clang when compiling the program with PGO (format 2). > > Format 1 > -------- > > This format should be efficient to write, since the
2014 Jun 19
4
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Add a simple soft-float class
On Jun 18, 2014, at 8:38 PM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith <dexonsmith at apple.com> wrote: >> >> On 2014 Jun 18, at 13:29, Owen Anderson <resistor at mac.com> wrote: >> >> Numerical analysis is hard. Every numerics expert I have ever worked with considers trying to re-invent floating point a cardinal sin of numerical analysis. Just don’t do it. You will miss
2012 Oct 16
0
[LLVMdev] R_ARM_ABS32 disassembly with integrated-as
Hi Greg, I'm afraid I've not looked into the infrastructure Jim put into place, so I've not really been able to answer the "how should I do it" questions, but hopefully I can comment on the ABI. > And probably questions for Tim, are these "section-relative" mapping > symbols, as defined in 4.6.5.1 of the ELF for ARM document? Yes, they are. > And what
2012 Dec 03
0
[LLVMdev] [RFC] "noclone" function attribute
On Dec 3, 2012, at 9:48 AM, James Molloy <James.Molloy at arm.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for the pointers. My patch now calls the attribute "noduplicate", > and updates CodeMetrics to have another field: > > bool notDuplicatable; > > Which semantically is "containsIndirectBr || containsNoDuplicateInst". I > didn't repurpose
2006 Feb 13
6
How can I access the value of params[:tags] in my validate function?
I would like to have tags mandatory in my app. The following keeps giving me error that params is nill. def validate() if (@params[:tags]) errors.add(@params[:tags], ":tags must be entered ") end end Why cannot I access params in my model class? The field for tags is called "tags" How else can I add an error using errors.add? I
2018 Nov 09
2
RFC: System (cache, etc.) model for LLVM
Am Do., 8. Nov. 2018 um 10:36 Uhr schrieb David Greene <dag at cray.com>: > What about load prefetching vs. non-temporal stores on X86? There's a > limited number of write-combining buffers but prefetches "just" use the > regular load paths. Yes, there's a limited number of load buffers but I > would expect the the number of independent prefetch streams one
2018 Feb 27
0
Quorum in distributed-replicate volume
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 4:18 PM, Dave Sherohman <dave at sherohman.org> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 03:20:25PM +0530, Karthik Subrahmanya wrote: > > If you want to use the first two bricks as arbiter, then you need to be > > aware of the following things: > > - Your distribution count will be decreased to 2. > > What's the significance of this? I'm
2018 Feb 27
2
Quorum in distributed-replicate volume
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 12:00:29PM +0530, Karthik Subrahmanya wrote: > I will try to explain how you can end up in split-brain even with cluster > wide quorum: Yep, the explanation made sense. I hadn't considered the possibility of alternating outages. Thanks! > > > It would be great if you can consider configuring an arbiter or > > > replica 3 volume. > >
2014 Apr 11
5
Old HP Xeon server blade with only SCSI HDD ports & CentOS
Hi there. I got myself a pair of old Intel Xeon blades, which I plan to repurpose with CentOS. The model is : HP bl20p-g3 server blade Manual http://h18004.www1.hp.com/products/quickspecs/12322_ca/12322_ca.pdf Now, the main problem with this hardware is that LVD UW SCSI HDDs are hard to find and hella expensive if you find em (and of reduced capacity). Any of you know: 1. If there's any
2018 Feb 09
9
[RFC] Should we bump the bitcode version in LLVM 6.0?
...st-r317488 compiler is going to skip any optimization guarded by isFast for all pre-r317488 bitcode file (remember the afn bit is not set here) 2. a pre-r317488 compiler is going to run any optimization guarded by unsafeAlgebra for any post-r317488 bitcode file that has the reassoc bit (remember we repurposed UnsafeMath) Scenario #2 might be unlikely but we’re potentially breaking the semantic of the program. It is particularly dangerous because there is nothing that is going to tell us that we are in this situation “downgrade" situation. #1 means that any code that uses unsafeMath is going to get...
2018 Feb 27
2
Quorum in distributed-replicate volume
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 04:59:36PM +0530, Karthik Subrahmanya wrote: > > > Since arbiter bricks need not be of same size as the data bricks, if you > > > can configure three more arbiter bricks > > > based on the guidelines in the doc [1], you can do it live and you will > > > have the distribution count also unchanged. > > > > I can probably find
2018 Feb 26
2
Quorum in distributed-replicate volume
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 05:45:27PM +0530, Karthik Subrahmanya wrote: > > "In a replica 2 volume... If we set the client-quorum option to > > auto, then the first brick must always be up, irrespective of the > > status of the second brick. If only the second brick is up, the > > subvolume becomes read-only." > > > By default client-quorum is
2013 Apr 26
1
[LLVMdev] Proposal for new Legalization framework
On Apr 25, 2013, at 1:50 AM, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote: > Hi Dan, > > On 25 Apr 2013, at 01:01, Dan Gohman <dan433584 at gmail.com> wrote: > >> The main alternative approach that's been discussed is to do FastISel to a target-independent opcode set on MachineInstrs, and then do legalization and ultimately the last phase off
2011 Sep 13
0
[LLVMdev] debugging LLVM-JITted code
...d be the best place to start? Any existing interfaces that should be reused/implemented/extended here? lib/ExecutionEngine/MCJIT and lib/ExecutionEngine/RuntimeDyld. The old JIT (lib/ExecutionEngine/JIT) probably has some bits in it for telling the debugger where the debug info lives that could be repurposed, or at minimum would be good reading for general "what's involved" sort of information gathering. If there's debug information in the input IR, the backend should generate the appropriate debug info sections in the MCJIT'ed object file (in memory), just like a normal object f...