search for: repsect

...pos > (pt:8,dt:4294967294,dist:1,delay:10), packetno 3: 6.700 kB > 00:00:00.041: serialno 1763535876, granulepos > (pt:2,dt:0,dist:2,delay:2), packetno 4: 839 bytes > Are the reported granulepos of the packetno 2 and 3 correct? The dt > value looks large. Those should be -4 and -2, repsectively. Otherwise, those numbers appear correct. > If it is ok for packets in an Ogg Dirac bitstream to be decreasing, > which oggz-validate reports as out of order -- I assume/recall that > this is if they are sequenced in dependency order, not display order > -- then how should oggz-v...

...Rails Appslications. http://railsblob.blogspot.com/2006/08/uisng-design-pattrens-in-yor-rails.html Don''t tell the Javacs, as they might Steal Them and we is not winnning that battle since DDT has made us upgarde our Rails under vieled threats of violance (I is not dissing you DDT - I repsects you) Pease. Rails Blog -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1953 --- Comment #3 from Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo at scientia.net> --- Does anyone know whether anything is going on with SFTP (especially also with repsect to ACLs and XATTRs)? More than a year ago we saw this http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-moonesamy-secsh-filexfer-00 which apparently tried to restart the draft-ietf-secsh-filexfer series... Not having ACLs/XATTRs in SSH/SFTP continues to be a pain in the arse, especially since basically all the bi...

Hi Slight problem - linux 2.4 running dovecot, Solaris 2.8 home directory server. Full lockd support etc. I had to make the following code patches (at end of mail for clarity) to get dovecot to read the users mbox files at all. 1) fcntl with F_SETLKW will not work against a Solaris 2.8 server as proved with a small test program. Other forms of fcntl (ie F_SETLK) are OK. I noticed there are

...x being: {[}{OffsetReg | Disp{5,8,16}},{- | --}IndexReg{+ | ++ | ]} OffsetReg can be 8bit or 16bit accumulator (so only certain regs allowed) Displacment can be 5, 8 or 16 bit signed IndexReg can only be special index registers or PC or stack + ++ is post increment by 1, 2 repsectively - -- is pre decrement by 1, 2 respectively [ ] the entire effective address is a pointer to pointer [] and any incrementors/decrementors are mutally exclusive So given the machine instruction : add d ,x # to the d register add what the x register points at furthe...

Hi, I'm wondering if the Dirac granulepos parsing in liboggz and display in the oggz tools is currently correct, as I'd like to do a release of these soon. A couple of days ago David Schleef mentioned there were some problems. David, is that currently true (ie. since David Flynn's recent updates to support Dirac), and if so could you please explain what the problems are, or point me