search for: reproducability

Hello, I would like to sample a population but the result needs to be reproducible, using 'runif' or 'sample' is the good way to do it but I can't manage to make the results reproducible even with the 'set.seed' function. My aim is that th call to 'sample(1:100,10)' gives always the same result, how can I do that? Thanks! Eric Esposito

We often refer requesters to the Posting Guide and chide them for not reading it. Recently I had occasion to re-read the Posting Guide which is for all R lists not just R-help. The word "reproducible" does not appear anywhere in the guide. The closest it comes is the following suggestion: "Sometimes it helps to provide a small example that someone can actually run."

Hi, unfortunately I missed one ordering problem in the makefiles. I've attached another small patch to fix that. With that patch also applied (currently in Debian experimental), the reproducible-builds.org project shows syslinux to be reproducible on both amd64 and i386 [1]. :) Gene: Please consider also merging the attached patch. Thank you Lukas

On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 09:48:52PM +0000, Olly Betts wrote: > On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 08:52:47PM +0100, Sylvain Taverne wrote: > > I've remarked the error occur when i'm trying to get stored values from a > > database with a lot of stored values. I can reproduce the error with simple > > python2 script i've posted on github > > > >

Hi, I've recently started working on the syslinux package on Debian. I noticed there are a few patches applied to the Debian version which seem generally useful to me. Please consider merging them: * 0001-digest-sha.patch: It appears that "Digest::SHA1" has been superseded by "Digest:SHA". * 0003-extlinux-manpage.patch: Updates to the extlinux man page. *

All, Recently I ran across a URL documenting published research using R: http://www.cgd.ucar.edu/ccr/ammann/millennium/CODES_MBH.html A note on the site indicates that the code is being revised. The code and data are provided, so that one could reproduce the results without having to buy a proprietary software program. In poking around the R website it is clear that a lot of thought has gone

Hi! > Somehow Dovecot thinks that the mbox file changed under it.. Yes. And it's probably right, but I wonder what could have changed it. I looked around inotify and it seems there is no way to let a file being watched and get program names/pids of processes accessing it. > These mbox corruptions are usually pretty difficult to reproduce (= impossible to fix without ability to

I am investigating some approaches to reproducible research. I need in the end to produce .html or .doc or .docx. I have used hwriter in the past but have had some problems with verbatim output from R. Tables are also not particularly convenient. I am interested in R2HTML and R2wd in particular, and possibly odfWeave. Does anyone have sample documents using any of these approaches which

Hi, In support of reproducible research at my Institute, I seek an approach to re-creating the R environments in which an analysis has been conducted. By which I mean, the exact version of R and the exact version of all packages used in a particular R session. I am seeking comments/criticism of this as a goal, and of the following outline of an approach: === When all the steps to an workflow

On 1/20/2017 3:19 PM, Philip Reames via llvm-dev wrote: > > If someone can produce an *IR* reproducer which they believe is > incorrect, I'm happy to take a look at the PRE code. I will not have > the time to reproduce this from C or work through the interaction of > other passes; I will only look at this if there is a bug with PRE > specific IR reproducer attached.

Hi! I was wondering whether anybody was looking at the bugs on Bugzilla. I'm asking because I've seen bugs tackled on the mailing list quite quickly, but two fully reproducible reports I've filed on Bugzilla haven't triggered any reaction in several weeks (for the older one). FWIW, these are: - Line goes beyond plot region

I was playing around with the ghyp package and simulated series of t-distributed variables when suddenly i was not able to reproduce the log likelihood values reported by the package. When trying to reproduce the likelihood values, I summed the log(dt(x,v)) values and it worked with some simulated series but not all. Is there any obvious flaws with this script? library("ghyp")

Make a reproducible example [1][2][3], because it doesn't happen for me. Then post your example at [4] or [5], because this is the wrong list for this question. You may find that the act of browsing the directory using a GUI is what creates that file rather than the compilation itself. [1] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5963269/how-to-make-a-great-r-reproducible-example [2]

After interacting with a 3d plot (eg plot3d, persp3d), is there a way to capture the final settings of view angles, etc, so that the final plot could be easily reproduced? The plot functions themselves just return a vector of 'ids'. -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/rgl-reproduce-final-state-of-interactive-plot-tp3667866p3667866.html Sent from the R help

I notice that phabricator has http://reviews.llvm.org/file/ which can hold files. I haven't tested the limit, but it seems like it handled a 26MB file fine (the particular file was just from a random LLD bugzilla bug). So it is probably a good idea to document somewhere that http://reviews.llvm.org/file/ can be used for storage of --reproduce cpio archives if they are too large for bugzilla.

Hello,?I?am experiencing some difficult time with my R package. Every time I compilei it a hidden file, desktop.ini, is?being created. I am using C++ behind, linkking to Rcpp. The file is generated even when I compile it with?Linux, and in many different computers. Does anybody have any advice or ideas? [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

<http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/file/n4645492/graph.jpg> I need to replicate this graph. It is a simple normal distribution-curve with mean 90 and sd=10. The vertical bars is the 95% confidence limit of the mean. How on earth do I add those confidence limits? Im thinking something that has to do with: c(0.025,0.975) But I really dont know :S Any help? -- View this message in

Can you reproduce this bug? Follow these steps: 1. Install Filezilla: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/filezilla/FileZilla_2_2_16_setup.exe?download 2. FTP into the server of your choice 3. Click and drag files from the server to your local machine (to copy them) 4. Realize now that even though the files have been copied to your machine, you are still dragging the files around If you can

Hi everyone, I want to test the passes in llvm, and I got some passes sequences that caused the crash of opt. Although I can use bugpoint to narrow down the source of problems, I can only get some reduced and simplified IR and passes to reproduce the problem. My question is how to get the reduced IR of the original IR file to reproduce the problem. For example, "opt a.bc -a -b -c -d (where

Hello, can anybody tell me how to produce a plot like the one in http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/vignettes/Implementation.pdf on page 13, Figure 6? The data is stored in: library(nlme) data(Oats) Cheers -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Help-needed-in-reproducing-a-plot-tp4119603p4119603.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at