search for: reprimands

As a person new to R, I joined the list. I am a long-term member of the Stata list, which has a tradition of being very helpful to newbies. Imagine my surprise when my first day's mail included a rough rebuke to someone for asking a simple question (including mentioning that the poster had been reprimanded about this sort of thing before). In the week I've been on it, there have been

...executive decision has to be implemented. But such strong wording and harsh unappealable consequences do make us, of the anti-social variety, very frightened. We grew in a world that never made sense, and we have suffered our childhoods and adulthoods in constant fear of irrational (to our minds) reprimands. This is not a simple matter, it's quite real and have made me seriously consider many times leaving the open source realm for good. I have left jobs and regressed in my career because of things like that. >From the very wording in the proposed CoC, we don't want to leave anyone behind,...

Sorry to have had to post this, But I need urgent help with configuring one adit 600 I picked up from e-bay. Issues. I cannot access the console port, I am using HyperTerminal with settings VT100, 9600, 8-N-1 I also do not have any user-manual so I am kind of stuck. Any help in getting me started would be really appreciated. Any default settings like Ethernet port address, that can help me

I am trying the Restful-Authentication (latest version, downloaded today) and upon running the generator, doing the migration, prepping the test system and putting the resources in routes.rb I get a Rspec test failure: ''SessionsController logins and redirects'' FAILED expected not nil, got nil routes.rb has: map.resources :users map.resources :sessions nothing else was

Time for a reminder to the list recipients... The list server rejects HTML-foramtted email. This is done on purpose. Any HTML-ized submissions it sees will be silently dropped on the floor. It doesn't cause any trouble; this is not a reprimand of any kind, just a reminder. If you've sent messages in the recent past that have never appeared on the list, chec to make sure all email you

> -----Original Message----- > From: Richard A. O'Keefe [mailto:ok at cs.otago.ac.nz] <snip> > The very existence of an "is.na<-" which accepts a logical > vector containing FALSE as well as TRUE ... And don't forget this is not the only usage of is.na<-. In fact it is designed to take any valid indexing value. For example: > a<-1:10 >

I wholeheartedly agree. Maybe in time the list will divide into two whereby 'apparantly' simple questions will be answered without a curt rebuke! I too am now signing off the list and will bury my head in a manual ot two. As a last comment; everyone has to start the learning process somewhere and lets face it, with a deadline looming and what appears to be an insurmaountable question

Untitled Document ? ???? ??? ??? ?? ?????. ? ? ??? ????? ?? ?? ? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ? 50?? ??[??]?????. ? E-mail ??? ??? ?? ??????,????? ??? ????? ??? ?? ????. ? ??? E-mail??? ??? ??? ??? ????? ?????? ????. ? ??? ??? ?????? ????? ?????. ??????? ??? ????? ??? ??? ?? ?? ????? ???? ?? ????? ?? ???? ?? ???? ??? ?? ? ??? ???? ????. ?? ????? ?? ???? ???? ?

Time for a reminder to the list recipients... The list server rejects HTML-foramtted email. This is done on purpose. Any HTML-ized submissions it sees will be silently dropped on the floor. It doesn't cause any trouble; this is not a reprimand of any kind, just a reminder. If you've sent messages in the recent past that have never appeared on the list, chec to make sure all email you

> On Oct 13, 2015, at 2:45 PM, Philip Reames via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > +1 to the general idea of a CoC > > A couple of specific thoughts: > > 1) It would have been nice for this not to appeared out of thin air. In an ideal world, a previous update would have mentioned ongoing thought and research in this area. > Some back story here. I

I have struggled with compiling 2.0.5a on Solaris 2.6 with gcc version 2.8.1 for the last couple of weeks (not a high priority project) and decided to try a precompiled version just in case I was being stupid. Well, perhaps I'm stupider (is that a word) than I thought because I installed the package and I still cannot connect. I have read through the docs and tried more than a few

Greetings everyone, On behalf of the board of the LLVM Foundation, I’d like to start the process of introducing a formal code of conduct for the community. For a long time, various members of the community have been enforcing basic reasonable and respectful behavior, but to an outsider this may not be obvious. A public code of conduct advertises the behavior we expect of community members and

Wait, this change is not submitted yet, right? Or you mean mailing of this change in bad shape? I consider this change as work-in-progress where author is looking for feedback on his ongoing progress. I guess the change description should have been spelled this very explicitly. This change definitely needs more work to be submitted, splitting into smaller patches with a plan for submission order,

I think the thread ended up with several people (not only me) feeling certain they didn't like `is.na<-` but with the developers defending it and me not really understanding why. Uwe Ligges was going to come up with an example of `<- NA` going wrong (sorry Brian R, I mean behaving unexpectedly), but never did, and I think the problem has been fixed. It was apparently a problem with

On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 19 August 2015 at 11:29, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov at google.com> wrote: >> Wait, this change is not submitted yet, right? Or you mean mailing of >> this change in bad shape? > > Right. > > Jason has submitted high quality patches before, so this is in no way > a reprimand

...d. > > But such strong wording and harsh unappealable consequences do make > us, of the anti-social variety, very frightened. We grew in a world > that never made sense, and we have suffered our childhoods and > adulthoods in constant fear of irrational (to our minds) reprimands. > This is not a simple matter, it's quite real and have made me > seriously consider many times leaving the open source realm for good. > I have left jobs and regressed in my career because of things like > that. > > From the very wording in the proposed C...

I have installed CentOS 5 with all updates. Also I have 2 ne2000 isa cards. In recompiling the kernel, I have been trying to follow the instructions on this URL: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Custom_Kernel The complete error message I get is: Makefile:403: /home/cs/redhat/BUILD/kernel-2.6.18/linux-2.6.18.i686/arch//Makefile: No such file or directory I have the following kernel and rpm

On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 4:23 PM Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > > From: "Tanya Lattner via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > > > Some back story here. I have gotten many requests through email and > > at the developer meetings about having a Code of Conduct and > > specifically having one for LLVM Developer Meetings. It has been

Hi Hans, Since you are actively doing this kind of things, your feedbacks is particularly valuable. Thanks! > On May 2, 2016, at 3:45 PM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: > > On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Quentin Colombet via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> I am sending this proposal to get feedbacks on how we could make the tagging