search for: reprimanding

Displaying 19 results from an estimated 19 matches for "reprimanding".

2004 Dec 02
1
Final comment from a newbie
As a person new to R, I joined the list. I am a long-term member of the Stata list, which has a tradition of being very helpful to newbies. Imagine my surprise when my first day's mail included a rough rebuke to someone for asking a simple question (including mentioning that the poster had been reprimanded about this sort of thing before). In the week I've been on it, there have been
2015 Oct 14
6
RFC: Introducing an LLVM Community Code of Conduct
On 14 October 2015 at 20:35, Tanya Lattner via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Related specifically to the developers meeting, we are growing quite > rapidly. For the past few years, we have been increasing our attendance from > 50 at the start to now over 350 attendees. With this many people (and many > new to the community), it seems important to have a code of
2005 Feb 23
3
Help With Adit 600 Configuration
Sorry to have had to post this, But I need urgent help with configuring one adit 600 I picked up from e-bay. Issues. I cannot access the console port, I am using HyperTerminal with settings VT100, 9600, 8-N-1 I also do not have any user-manual so I am kind of stuck. Any help in getting me started would be really appreciated. Any default settings like Ethernet port address, that can help me
2007 Dec 30
6
Restful-Authentication Rspec Failure Rails 2.0.2
I am trying the Restful-Authentication (latest version, downloaded today) and upon running the generator, doing the migration, prepping the test system and putting the resources in routes.rb I get a Rspec test failure: ''SessionsController logins and redirects'' FAILED expected not nil, got nil routes.rb has: map.resources :users map.resources :sessions nothing else was
2001 Jun 23
0
The list rejects HTML email: A reminder
Time for a reminder to the list recipients... The list server rejects HTML-foramtted email. This is done on purpose. Any HTML-ized submissions it sees will be silently dropped on the floor. It doesn't cause any trouble; this is not a reprimand of any kind, just a reminder. If you've sent messages in the recent past that have never appeared on the list, chec to make sure all email you
2003 Oct 09
1
is.na(v)<-b (was: Re: Beginner's query - segmentation fault)
> -----Original Message----- > From: Richard A. O'Keefe [mailto:ok at cs.otago.ac.nz] <snip> > The very existence of an "is.na<-" which accepts a logical > vector containing FALSE as well as TRUE ... And don't forget this is not the only usage of is.na<-. In fact it is designed to take any valid indexing value. For example: > a<-1:10 >
2004 Dec 02
0
Final comment from a newbie_and another
I wholeheartedly agree. Maybe in time the list will divide into two whereby 'apparantly' simple questions will be answered without a curt rebuke! I too am now signing off the list and will bury my head in a manual ot two. As a last comment; everyone has to start the learning process somewhere and lets face it, with a deadline looming and what appears to be an insurmaountable question
2002 Apr 03
0
[광고]openssh-unix-dev님지금신청하시면 무료샘플을 드립니다.
Untitled Document ? ???? ??? ??? ?? ?????. ? ? ??? ????? ?? ?? ? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ? 50?? ??[??]?????. ? E-mail ??? ??? ?? ??????,????? ??? ????? ??? ?? ????. ? ??? E-mail??? ??? ??? ??? ????? ?????? ????. ? ??? ??? ?????? ????? ?????. ??????? ??? ????? ??? ??? ?? ?? ????? ???? ?? ????? ?? ???? ?? ???? ??? ?? ? ??? ???? ????. ?? ????? ?? ???? ???? ?
2001 Jun 23
0
The list rejects HTML email: A reminder
Time for a reminder to the list recipients... The list server rejects HTML-foramtted email. This is done on purpose. Any HTML-ized submissions it sees will be silently dropped on the floor. It doesn't cause any trouble; this is not a reprimand of any kind, just a reminder. If you've sent messages in the recent past that have never appeared on the list, chec to make sure all email you
2015 Oct 13
2
RFC: Introducing an LLVM Community Code of Conduct
> On Oct 13, 2015, at 2:45 PM, Philip Reames via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > +1 to the general idea of a CoC > > A couple of specific thoughts: > > 1) It would have been nice for this not to appeared out of thin air. In an ideal world, a previous update would have mentioned ongoing thought and research in this area. > Some back story here. I
1999 Aug 20
0
Solaris 2.6 Samba 2.0.4b Server <-> Win 3.11 Client struggle
...teable = yes printable = no writelist = @mcss user = @mcss [pchome] comment = PC Directories path = /opt/samba/share/%m public = no writeable = yes writelist = @mcss user = @mcss <<<<<<END<<<<<< Any help would be appreciated, and please don't be too harsh in reprimanding me for silly mistakes. I have read through most of the docs (anything I thought could apply (lots of those)), and searched for answers on the Samba web page. Thank you, Troy Johnson
2015 Oct 13
33
RFC: Introducing an LLVM Community Code of Conduct
Greetings everyone, On behalf of the board of the LLVM Foundation, I’d like to start the process of introducing a formal code of conduct for the community. For a long time, various members of the community have been enforcing basic reasonable and respectful behavior, but to an outsider this may not be obvious. A public code of conduct advertises the behavior we expect of community members and
2015 Aug 19
2
TSAN hack on AArch64 for Android
Wait, this change is not submitted yet, right? Or you mean mailing of this change in bad shape? I consider this change as work-in-progress where author is looking for feedback on his ongoing progress. I guess the change description should have been spelled this very explicitly. This change definitely needs more work to be submitted, splitting into smaller patches with a plan for submission order,
2003 Oct 15
1
is.na(v)<-b (was: Re: Beginner's query - segmentation fault)
I think the thread ended up with several people (not only me) feeling certain they didn't like `is.na<-` but with the developers defending it and me not really understanding why. Uwe Ligges was going to come up with an example of `<- NA` going wrong (sorry Brian R, I mean behaving unexpectedly), but never did, and I think the problem has been fixed. It was apparently a problem with
2015 Aug 19
2
TSAN hack on AArch64 for Android
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 19 August 2015 at 11:29, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov at google.com> wrote: >> Wait, this change is not submitted yet, right? Or you mean mailing of >> this change in bad shape? > > Right. > > Jason has submitted high quality patches before, so this is in no way > a reprimand
2015 Oct 14
5
RFC: Introducing an LLVM Community Code of Conduct
On 10/14/2015 01:25 PM, Chandler Carruth via llvm-dev wrote: > On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 1:02 PM Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org > <mailto:renato.golin at linaro.org>> wrote: > > On 14 October 2015 at 20:35, Tanya Lattner via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > > Related specifically
2007 May 21
4
recompiling kernel results in error: .../linux-2.6.18.i686/arch//Makefile: No such file or directory
I have installed CentOS 5 with all updates. Also I have 2 ne2000 isa cards. In recompiling the kernel, I have been trying to follow the instructions on this URL: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Custom_Kernel The complete error message I get is: Makefile:403: /home/cs/redhat/BUILD/kernel-2.6.18/linux-2.6.18.i686/arch//Makefile: No such file or directory I have the following kernel and rpm
2015 Oct 13
5
RFC: Introducing an LLVM Community Code of Conduct
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 4:23 PM Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > > From: "Tanya Lattner via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > > > Some back story here. I have gotten many requests through email and > > at the developer meetings about having a Code of Conduct and > > specifically having one for LLVM Developer Meetings. It has been
2016 May 02
4
[RFC] Helping release management
Hi Hans, Since you are actively doing this kind of things, your feedbacks is particularly valuable. Thanks! > On May 2, 2016, at 3:45 PM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: > > On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Quentin Colombet via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> I am sending this proposal to get feedbacks on how we could make the tagging