search for: repositiories

I'm happy to have this in the main LLVM repositiory. The version in the test suite should likely stay there because the test suite should be buildable w/o LLVM itself -- it is largely a distinct thing. We re-use lit, but not much else from LLVM, and we wouldn't want to install the benchmark library the way we do lit. One interesting point: we should have some way of running the in-tree

...could chime in here. I self compiled a Samba DC (ver. 4.9.1) on CentOS 7.1 once upon a time. It was never updated, just the base OS. As the RedHat world got more an more quirky with time, I decided that I must do something about it, and setup Debian Buster with Samba from Louis van Belle's repositiories. I think it was 4.14 at the beginning, later on upgraded to 4.15.7 (I think). I transferred the FSMO roles to the Debian DC, and did not notice any adverse effects.?Before I did the transition, I made dead sure that the replication was working correctly. The caveat is, I'm not using bind,...

Heya, The script.aculo.us SVN repositiory now holds the 1.6 beta. This version is mostly a refactoring/bugfix release, and marks the switch over to Prototype 1.5 (Prototype 1.4.0 is no longer supported). The required prototype.js file is included (lib/prototype.js) of course. Changes since 1.5.3: * Prepare for script.aculo.us 1.6, add Prototype 1.5 requirement and check that

On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 1:20?PM Peter Milesson via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Couldn't you setup a completely new Debian VM with the latest Samba from > backports, sync with the old one, transfer the FSMO roles, and then > demote the old one? Wasn't sure I could do that with such a big jump. But it's worth a try. I always have my original as I'm

Morning, I have three machines, two xp and one win2k, that join the samba pdc fine. I have tried to join others to this same samba pdc using the same accounts for authentication without success. The xp machine first says the user does not exist, I click ok and go back to the screen for the domain account authorized to join the domain and press ok (or next) again and this time the xp box says the

Dear useRs, With the rise of netbooks and 'lifestyle laptops" I am tempted to get one of these to mainly run R on it. Processor power and hard disk space seem to be ok. What I wonder is the handling and feel with respect to R. Has anyone here installed or is running R on one of these, and if so, what is your experience? Would it be more of a nice looking gadget than a feasable platform

Thank you very much for the feedback! What Chandler said about test-suite totally makes sense to me since it's also excluded from LLVM git monorepo. I will try to land benchmark library to LLVM core repo and update it to the latest version. I have not been doing much CMake/project structure before, but I'll start looking into that next week. I'll reach out to Dominic if anything goes

Hi all, in particular package developers, I'm exploring using a version control system to keep better track of changes to the packages I maintain. I'm leaning towards git (although mercurial also looks good) but am not sure what is the best way to set up the repository. It seems I can't set the repository directly within the R package main directory, since it will be incompatible with

Hi all, in particular package developers, I'm exploring using a version control system to keep better track of changes to the packages I maintain. I'm leaning towards git (although mercurial also looks good) but am not sure what is the best way to set up the repository. It seems I can't set the repository directly within the R package main directory, since it will be incompatible with

As a part of upcoming new Clangd symbol index implementation, we would like to start support benchmarks of different Clangd pieces, such as index queries and code completion. There are already two projects in the LLVM tree using google/benchmark library while keeping its source code in-tree: libcxx (libcxx/utils/google-benchmark) and test-suite (test-suite/MicroBenchmarks/libs/benchmark-1.3.0).

Hi, I have resources available to host a portal specifically for the Asterisk system, to help correlate documentation, FAQ's and How To I am new to Asterisk, and my hardest work is in locating information on using or configuring the software. Would Mark, John or any of you feel this would be of benefit to host? I am offering a PHP-NUKE portal for this, (Unless you know of a better

...SION 2.11.0 > > > SIGNIFICANT USER-VISIBLE CHANGES > > o Packages must have been installed under R >= 2.10.0, as the > current help system is the only one now supported. > > o A port to 64-bit Windows is now available as well as binary > package repositiories: see the 'R Administration and > Installation Manual'. > > o Argument matching for primitive functions is now done in the > same way as for interpreted functions except for the deliberate > exceptions > > call switch .C .Fortran .Cal...

...le: CHANGES IN R VERSION 2.11.0 SIGNIFICANT USER-VISIBLE CHANGES o Packages must have been installed under R >= 2.10.0, as the current help system is the only one now supported. o A port to 64-bit Windows is now available as well as binary package repositiories: see the 'R Administration and Installation Manual'. o Argument matching for primitive functions is now done in the same way as for interpreted functions except for the deliberate exceptions call switch .C .Fortran .Call .External all of...

...le: CHANGES IN R VERSION 2.11.0 SIGNIFICANT USER-VISIBLE CHANGES o Packages must have been installed under R >= 2.10.0, as the current help system is the only one now supported. o A port to 64-bit Windows is now available as well as binary package repositiories: see the 'R Administration and Installation Manual'. o Argument matching for primitive functions is now done in the same way as for interpreted functions except for the deliberate exceptions call switch .C .Fortran .Call .External all of...