search for: report_e

On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 08:47:08PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote: > On 07/29/2017 07:08 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 10:50:11AM +0800, Wei Wang wrote: > > > > > > OK I thought this over. While we might need these new APIs in > > > > > > the future, I think that at the moment, there's a way to implement > > > > >

On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 08:47:08PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote: > On 07/29/2017 07:08 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 10:50:11AM +0800, Wei Wang wrote: > > > > > > OK I thought this over. While we might need these new APIs in > > > > > > the future, I think that at the moment, there's a way to implement > > > > >

On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 05:59:17AM +0000, Wang, Wei W wrote: > On Sunday, July 30, 2017 12:23 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 08:47:08PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote: > > > On 07/29/2017 07:08 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 10:50:11AM +0800, Wei Wang wrote: > > > > > > > > OK I thought this

On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 05:59:17AM +0000, Wang, Wei W wrote: > On Sunday, July 30, 2017 12:23 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 08:47:08PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote: > > > On 07/29/2017 07:08 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 10:50:11AM +0800, Wei Wang wrote: > > > > > > > > OK I thought this

On Sunday, July 30, 2017 12:23 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 08:47:08PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote: > > On 07/29/2017 07:08 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 10:50:11AM +0800, Wei Wang wrote: > > > > > > > OK I thought this over. While we might need these new APIs > > > > > > > in the future,

On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 07:18:33PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 05:59:17AM +0000, Wang, Wei W wrote: > > On Sunday, July 30, 2017 12:23 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 08:47:08PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote: > > > > On 07/29/2017 07:08 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at

On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 10:50:11AM +0800, Wei Wang wrote: > > > > OK I thought this over. While we might need these new APIs in > > > > the future, I think that at the moment, there's a way to implement > > > > this feature that is significantly simpler. Just add each s/g > > > > as a separate input buffer. > > > > > > Should

On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 10:50:11AM +0800, Wei Wang wrote: > > > > OK I thought this over. While we might need these new APIs in > > > > the future, I think that at the moment, there's a way to implement > > > > this feature that is significantly simpler. Just add each s/g > > > > as a separate input buffer. > > > > > > Should

As it seems that the vorbis decoder is now stable with respect to format/features, would it be time to start thinking about a hardware implementation? I would be interested in pursuing this if some there is consensus on requirements. If there is some enthusiasm for it then a module could be set up on the opencores site for a gate-array decoder. cya, Andrew... --- >8 ---- List

On 07/29/2017 07:08 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 10:50:11AM +0800, Wei Wang wrote: >>>>> OK I thought this over. While we might need these new APIs in >>>>> the future, I think that at the moment, there's a way to implement >>>>> this feature that is significantly simpler. Just add each s/g >>>>> as a