search for: reporducible

Just curious if anyone has done anything similar, as I'd rather not reporduce work. I'm going to put alias handling (and only alias handling) into a modified version of insmod. The reason I'm doing this is to aid in boot time module loading via aliases exposed in sysfs. Sure, I could include modprobe directly in the initramfs, but it's a bit large, and I really only need alias

qxl has two modes: "native" (used by the drm driver) and "vga" (vga compatibility mode, typically used for boot display and firmware framebuffers). Accessing any vga ioport will switch the qxl device into vga mode. The qxl driver never does that, but other drivers accessing vga ports can trigger that too and therefore disturb qxl operation. So aquire the legacy vga ioports

> > qxl has two modes: "native" (used by the drm driver) and "vga" (vga > compatibility mode, typically used for boot display and firmware > framebuffers). > > Accessing any vga ioport will switch the qxl device into vga mode. > The qxl driver never does that, but other drivers accessing vga ports > can trigger that too and therefore disturb qxl

The Winamp3 hit the streets yesterday, so i gave the FLAC Winamp3 plugin a shot (dragged cnv_flacpcm.wac to the Wacs/ directory, yadda yadda) and received the following error message when starting Winamp3: --- Studio.exe - Entry point Not Found The procedure entry point_chkesp could not be located in the dynamic link library MSVCRTD.dll. -- It's unable to play .flac files, but still plays

Has anyone seen this issue? We're running containers under CentOS 7.2 and some of these containers are reporting incorrect memory allocation in /proc/meminfo. The output below comes from a system with 32G of memory and 84GB of swap. The values reported are completely wrong. # cat /proc/meminfo MemTotal: 9007199254740991 kB MemFree: 9007199224543267 kB MemAvailable: 12985680

Good day all. This is to thank all those who have helped in fixing this problem. Starting with a text book was indeed a problem, however, that gave me a clue of what I was looking for. This, with your contributions added to other materials I got on the net, put me on the right track. Thank you so much. Warmest regards Ogbos On 31 January 2010 14:07, S Ellison <S.Ellison@lgc.co.uk> wrote:

Hi, I have a list(A1) of dataframe and a vector containing a 22 list names. list(A1) abc l m n p q r dce e g h l k m kpo a d c also i have a vector of list names. abc,dce similarly i have 22 elements. I wanna delete or want a list without the list elements whoes name match up the vector. my result should be kpo a d c. i tried lapply it is in working in the way i want. Kindly help me

Now reporduced with 100% 1) create contrainer with memory limit 1Gb 2) run inside simple memory test allocator: #include <malloc.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <memory.h> #define MB 1024 * 1024 int main() { int total = 0; while (1) { void *p = malloc( 100*MB ); memset(p,0, 100*MB ); total = total + 100; printf("Alloc %d Mb\n",total); sleep(1);

Hi everyone, Suppose I have a count the occurrences of positive results, and the total number of occurrences: pos <- 14 total <- 15 testing that the proportion of positive occurrences is greater than 0.5 gives a p-value and confidence interval: prop.test( pos, total, p=0.5, alternative='greater') 1-sample proportions test with continuity correction data: 14 out of

On 04/26/2016 07:44 AM, mxs kolo wrote: > Now reporduced with 100% > 1) create contrainer with memory limit 1Gb > 2) run inside simple memory test allocator: > #include <malloc.h> > #include <unistd.h> > #include <memory.h> > #define MB 1024 * 1024 > int main() { > int total = 0; > while (1) { > void *p = malloc( 100*MB ); >

Hey all, I was watching some logs on a domU today and i suddenly noticed that the timestamps were off by something on the order of 47 seconds. I was surprised because *I don''t* run independent wall clocks. I checked some other domUs and the "drift" was also very close to that of the first domU. I also checked another dom0, Here the domUs were "only" out of sync by

Hello, not understanding the output of prcomp, I reduce the number of components and the output continues to show cumulative 100% of the variance explained, which can't be the case dropping from 8 components to 3. How do i get the output in terms of the cumulative % of the total variance, so when i go from total solution of 8 (8 variables in the data set), to a reduced number of

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60007 Priority: medium Bug ID: 60007 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: BUG: nouveau crashes in various ways in 32-bits Fedora 18 QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: critical Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux (All)