search for: repoducible

Hi List, The Samba Howto Collection http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/AccessControls.html#id2611229 says: "When the set user or group ID bit (s) is set on a directory, then all files created within it will be owned by the user and/or group whose `set user or group' bit is set. " while i cannot repoduce this behavior the wikipedia says:

...w packages from CRAN, namely 'pls' and 'splines', as well as 'gplots','gtools' and 'gdata'. I have no idea what is causing this problem, but I guess it might be a bug. I shold perhaps mention that I saw an almost identical bug report entered in the 'not-repoducible' directory of previous bug reports by one Sabyasaschi Ray on 020805. His problem remains unsolved. Best regards P?l Trosvik Ph.D. student University of Oslo - Department of Biology/Norwegian Food Research Institute

Hy, I got the following problem when trying to build a rpart model and using everything but LOOCV. Originally, I wanted to used k-fold partitioning, but every partitioning except LOOCV throws the following warning: ---- Warning message: In nominalTrainWorkflow(dat = trainData, info = trainInfo, method = method, : There were missing values in resampled performance measures. ----- Below are some

hey. I'm using the Search::Xapian interface version 0.9.2 (and xapian-core 0.9.2), and feeding the queryparser such things as "one AND NOT two" or "test NOT NOT really" makes it go "Aborted"... I've tried adding the exception handling from the other stubs to QueryParser.xs as well, but I still can't catch this error from perl. Does this mean

Hi All, I have a question about R parallel computing by using snowfall. How can I set the seeds on parallel workers to get the same result as sequential mode? For example: > sfSapply(c(1,1),rnorm) [1] 1.823082 -2.222052 > rnorm(2) [1] -0.5179967 -1.0807196 How to get the identical result? Thanks. Libo Sun Graduate Student, Department of Statistics, Colorado State University Fort

This crashes the development version, but apparently also earlier versions (a typo of course, but still shouldn't happen) response<-rnorm(60) dag<-gl(3,2,60) rep<-gl(2,1,60) person<-gl(10,6,60) aov(response~dag+Error(person/dag/response)) # error from model.matrix.default gc() # *poof*... --please do not edit the information below-- Version: platform = i586-unknown-linux

Full_Name: Roger peng Version: 1.4.0 (2001-12-13) OS: GNU/Linux (Redhat 7.1) Submission from: (NULL) (128.97.86.126) R compiles fine and runs, but when I call the library() function with no arguments I get the error: > library() Error in FUN(X[[2]], ...) : subscript out of bounds make check also fails when running code in base-Ex.R (I'm assuming it fails where library() function is

Full_Name: Alexander Blocker Version: 2.7.1 OS: Ubuntu 8.04 / Windows XP Submission from: (NULL) (76.119.235.225) When running lm(modeleq, weights=wt, data=dataset) with small weights (<1e-10), I have encountered an odd phenomenon with fitted values. Due to numerical precision issues, the fitted values and residuals returned by lm.wfit (from its .Fortran call to dqrls) can differ greatly from

i found the following also .. Aug 7 08:44:10 rtd-print1 autofs[15991]: Starting automount.... Aug 7 08:48:26 rtd-print1 autofs[16291]: Stopping automount.... Aug 7 08:48:27 rtd-print1 automount[16302]: syntax error in map near [ * server.internal.domain.tld: ] Aug 7 08:48:27 rtd-print1 autofs[16297]: Starting automount.... Aug 7 08:48:46 rtd-print1 rpcbind: rpcbind terminating on signal.

ok, i cant make i crash. but i notice my cpu load. 17535 username 20 0 294852 13716 11520 R 100.0 1.3 280:28.70 winbindd 542 username 20 0 291040 16720 14172 R 99.6 1.6 281:45.88 winbindd and the funny thing.. this user isnt logged in anymore since the last 6 hours. Greetz, Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at

Dear altogether, I tried local regression with the following data. These data are a part of a bigger dataset for which loess is no problem. However, the plot shows extreme values and by looking into the fits, it reveals very extreme values (up to 20000 !) although the original data are > summary(cbind(x,y)) x y Min. :1.800 Min. :2.000 1st Qu.:2.550

On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 08:36:14AM +0200, Sven Schwedas wrote: > On 2015-08-24 20:55, Jeremy Allison wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 09:21:23AM +0200, Sven Schwedas wrote: > > winbindd is extremely reliable and fully supported by the Samba > > Team, please don't post FUD about Samba components. If you have > > winbindd problems, post bug reports > > I did,

Hi everybody, this is a real dummy thing. I sorted a matrix based on a given column, and what I get is right, until it comes to columns of negative and positive values; than, "order" orders everything from max to min in the negative values, and then AGAIN from max to min in the positive values!!! Why isn't everything order from max to min, and that's it? Thank you!!! Attached

...der heavy load with the help of siege and pylot. The > VM > crashes every time I put the webserver under heavy load, everytime with > the > same backtrace. I replaced the full system (all hardware components except the harddisks) with a new one in the meantime - and still the bug is repoducible. I'll try to describe the setup: Two Xen virtualization servers (xen1 and xen2), mirroring one block device with DRBD using a primary/secondary setup. The DRBD device holds LVM with the LVs for one single virtual machine (the webserver). This webserver runs an Apache2 daemon. The first virtua...

Hey again, Am 2014-08-19 12:26, schrieb Jonas Meurer: > I encounter kernel crashes on an up-to-date Debian/Wheezy Xen domU with > the > stock kernel. The dom0 runs the same linux kernel and > xen/4.1.4-3+deb7u1. the bug is still reproducible with the latest kernel and Xen packages from Debian Wheezy. Unfortunately it seems like a corner case, somehow related to the hardware