Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "rep64".
Did you mean:
reg64
2007 Dec 17
0
[LLVMdev] Bogus X86-64 Patterns
...10/056334.html
>
> Please verify. Thanks.
The patch is similar to what I did. I'll have to create an llvm testcase to
verify it as this is a Fortran code. It would also be good to have a
regression test for this anyway.
Does the Leopard assembler support movq for rr instructions? The
rep64 movd sequence is ugly and esoteric. It's much more readable
to say movq.
-Dave
2007 Dec 14
2
[LLVMdev] Bogus X86-64 Patterns
Actually, movq is recognized by the assembler on Leopard. I've fixed
this:
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-
Mon-20071210/056334.html
Please verify. Thanks.
Evan
On Dec 14, 2007, at 10:12 AM, Evan Cheng wrote:
>
> On Dec 12, 2007, at 7:42 PM, David A. Greene wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday 12 December 2007 06:16:25 pm Evan Cheng wrote:
>>