search for: reorganises

...With such a folder structure, it is easier to see what is going on. Is there a tool that can reorganise existing e-mails into such a folder structure? I found some tools on the Internet to backup and export mails from IMAP to IMAP or maildir destinations. But I could not find a tool that just reorganises (moves) e-mails in such a manner inside an existing mailbox, maybe with a user-defined pattern for the destination folders. I guess moving e-mails around on the same mailbox would be much faster than exporting and reimporting them in some clever way. I could always write a Perl script, but that...

...] With such a folder structure, it is easier to see what is going on. Is there a tool that can reorganise existing e-mails into such a folder structure? I found some tools on the Internet to backup and export mails from IMAP to IMAP or maildir destinations. But I could not find a tool that just reorganises (moves) e-mails in such a manner inside an existing mailbox, maybe with a user-defined pattern for the destination folders. I guess moving e-mails around on the same mailbox would be much faster than exporting and reimporting them in some clever way. I could always write a Perl script, but that t...

Hi guys, I would like to reorganise the general CentOS FAQ. It now has 20 questions about a lot of different things that can be structure much better. I would like to add some questions, but lacking any structure... I would like to make a distinction between the following subjects: - General questions about the CentOS project Answers about what the project is about, why the project

Hi David, On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 5:22 PM, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk > wrote: > On 12 Feb 2014, at 13:21, Alexey Samsonov <samsonov at google.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 4:56 PM, David Chisnall < > David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote: > >> Are you going to move the unwind library there as part of the >

> >First of all, thanks for your answer. > >> What is the problem with having huge online mailboxes? Just choose a > good european provider that has encryption all the way through to their> storage platform. > >We already have a European ISP with a standard e-mail server. I wanted to keep our own mail server on premises, so that it is not exposed on >the

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 4:56 PM, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk > wrote: > Are you going to move the unwind library there as part of the > reorganisation? > No. > > David > > On 11 Feb 2014, at 09:59, Alexey Samsonov <samsonov at google.com> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > compiler-rt is now not only a libgcc replacement for

Hey, i have a question about how to reorganize a data frame in the easiest way. my example: what would be the easiest way to bring a data.frame such like this: ---- nr height age Seed 1 1 4.51 3 301 2 15 10.89 5 301 3 29 28.72 10 301 4 43 41.74 15 301 5 57 52.70 20 301 6 71 60.92 25 301 7 2 4.55 3 303 8 16 10.92 5 303 9 30 29.07 10 303 10 44

First of all, thanks for your answer. > What is the problem with having huge online mailboxes? Just choose a > good european provider that has encryption all the way through to their> storage platform. We already have a European ISP with a standard e-mail server. I wanted to keep our own mail server on premises, so that it is not exposed on the Internet. The current server fetches (and

What is the current status of both rename-patches ? Are there alternative measures ? Frequently users reorganise directories and files. Recently a directory of 40GB was renamed... It took 3 weeks to re-copy all over an ADSL-link. I have followed the last couple of years the postings, and realise it is not as easy as it seems. But the users do not understand this at all 8-( Thanks, Nico

> > Second, is there a simple way to test the builder and config before I commit > > it? > > I am afraid not. > But there is a ugly (and certainly not simple) way to partially test the builder that I mentioned recently [1]. I say partially because I ended up removing all the builders apart from my own. @Dmitri - Has anyone considered reorganising zorg so it is easier to

Hi, I plan to reorganise our IP management and I'd like to implement a slave DHCP server. Right now we assign IP addresses based on the ethernetadress of a client 1:1. The tutorial here [1] is simple and looks like the thing I need. I do have a lot of subnetworks and my cisco router has an DHCP helper address set. I know I'll have to add the second dhcp-server address. My questions now

Hi all, I have a large dataset that has >10k entries. The dataset is stored in a dataframe with the headers: SubID Condition1 Condition2 Result1 Result2 There are multiple entries for a given SubID(Subject ID). Condition 1 has 3 levels and condition2 has 2 levels (therefore there are 6 possible combinations all together e.g. Cond1 Level1 x Cond2 Level 1 etc.) and i need to compute for 1. The

Hello I was just thinking about a killer feature for rsync, the ability to detect files name changes or move within the source and destination. At this time rsync has to re-transfer a file if it has been renamed or moved inside a subfolder, with a heavy waste of ressources and bandwidth. It could be smarter : with a --smart switch, rsync could take a hash of every file within the source and

Hello everyone, Zorg is a common code for multiple different buildbot setups. This is why it sits in its own subtree. The only tricky thing there is that it assumes some relative position of zorg and master setup. Documenting this would save somebody some time. All together wasn't a problem so far. But having a better documentation and a set of files for a simple local setup is a good idea.

On 04/08/2014 16:20, Dmitri Gribenko wrote: > On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Dan Liew <dan at su-root.co.uk> wrote: >>>> Second, is there a simple way to test the builder and config before I >>>> commit >>>> it? >>> >>> I am afraid not. >>> >> >> But there is a ugly (and certainly not simple) way to partially test

After a reorganisation of patches, and sending a bunch of them to Chris, I''ve also updated the integration branch to match that. It''s available from: http://git.darksatanic.net/repo/btrfs-progs-unstable.git/ integration-20110630 The shortlog of 17 patches in this branch beyond the ones I''ve sent to Chris is below. Hugo. Andreas Philipp (1): print parent

On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 17:14 +0000, you wrote: > What API did you use in 3.2? llvm::Linker used to have a method LinkInLibrary(). My understanding is that there's a larger reorganisation of the linking process going on but I haven't found a straight-forward replacement for that method yet. I might be missing something though. Or perhaps I could even just reuse some code from that old

Hi, The rcompletion package, originally intended to provide completion for readline-based R interfaces, has undergone a number of changes. These changes are summarised below: o Reorganisation: - The package has been split into two. All the completion code has been moved to a pure R package called 'rcompgen'. 'rcompletion' now requires 'rcompgen' and

Hi, Can anyone tell me how I can compile R from source under Windows environemtn (I kind of know how to do it in a UNIX enviroment)? What I mean is, suppose I make some changes in the R base, or reorganising the libraries, and want to compile into a Setup.exe file (like the one located in CRAN), how should I do this? Many thanks in advance... Ko-Kang Wang

Hi, The rcompletion package, originally intended to provide completion for readline-based R interfaces, has undergone a number of changes. These changes are summarised below: o Reorganisation: - The package has been split into two. All the completion code has been moved to a pure R package called 'rcompgen'. 'rcompletion' now requires 'rcompgen' and