search for: reorganise

...pport this also) then messages a user deletes, are not even removed from the server until "doveadm purge" is given ;) -----Original Message----- From: R. Diez [mailto:rdiezmail-2006 at yahoo.de] Sent: Monday, October 19, 2020 3:49 PM To: dovecot at dovecot.org Subject: How to move/reorganise existing e-mails to yearly subfolders Hi all: I am new to e-mail servers and I am evaluating Dovecot. Not really the best combination. 8-) I am trying to find a balance between legal data retention requirements and online mailbox size. I do not want huge online mailboxes, as doing offline, ro...

...ls from that mailbox on a yearly basis. I would like to automatically organise e-mails inside that mailbox into subfolders like this: 2019/alice 2019/bob 2020/alice 2020/bob That is: [year]/[username] With such a folder structure, it is easier to see what is going on. Is there a tool that can reorganise existing e-mails into such a folder structure? I found some tools on the Internet to backup and export mails from IMAP to IMAP or maildir destinations. But I could not find a tool that just reorganises (moves) e-mails in such a manner inside an existing mailbox, maybe with a user-defined pattern...

Hi guys, I would like to reorganise the general CentOS FAQ. It now has 20 questions about a lot of different things that can be structure much better. I would like to add some questions, but lacking any structure... I would like to make a distinction between the following subjects: - General questions about the CentOS project...

Hi David, On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 5:22 PM, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk > wrote: > On 12 Feb 2014, at 13:21, Alexey Samsonov <samsonov at google.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 4:56 PM, David Chisnall < > David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote: > >> Are you going to move the unwind library there as part of the >

...r deletes it, the original e-mail is still archived somewhere else. > >That is why I mentioned the Postfix's BCC feature. The idea is that you have a separate mailbox where a separate copy of all e-mails to and >from all users land. That is the separate mailbox where I wanted to reorganise e-mails by date, in order to archive the e-mails in smaller >chunks on a yearly basis. Those e-mails do not need to be online after all. Chances are, they will never be needed anyway. That should be simple to realize, just to folders to archive! You do not need BCC to have copies delivered...

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 4:56 PM, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk > wrote: > Are you going to move the unwind library there as part of the > reorganisation? > No. > > David > > On 11 Feb 2014, at 09:59, Alexey Samsonov <samsonov at google.com> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > compiler-rt is now not only a libgcc replacement for

Hey, i have a question about how to reorganize a data frame in the easiest way. my example: what would be the easiest way to bring a data.frame such like this: ---- nr height age Seed 1 1 4.51 3 301 2 15 10.89 5 301 3 29 28.72 10 301 4 43 41.74 15 301 5 57 52.70 20 301 6 71 60.92 25 301 7 2 4.55 3 303 8 16 10.92 5 303 9 30 29.07 10 303 10 44

..., so that if a user deletes it, the original e-mail is still archived somewhere else. That is why I mentioned the Postfix's BCC feature. The idea is that you have a separate mailbox where a separate copy of all e-mails to and from all users land. That is the separate mailbox where I wanted to reorganise e-mails by date, in order to archive the e-mails in smaller chunks on a yearly basis. Those e-mails do not need to be online after all. Chances are, they will never be needed anyway. > I have created an 'archive' environment on a distributed filesystem, and it > takes me quite a lo...

What is the current status of both rename-patches ? Are there alternative measures ? Frequently users reorganise directories and files. Recently a directory of 40GB was renamed... It took 3 weeks to re-copy all over an ADSL-link. I have followed the last couple of years the postings, and realise it is not as easy as it seems. But the users do not understand this at all 8-( Thanks, Nico

> > Second, is there a simple way to test the builder and config before I commit > > it? > > I am afraid not. > But there is a ugly (and certainly not simple) way to partially test the builder that I mentioned recently [1]. I say partially because I ended up removing all the builders apart from my own. @Dmitri - Has anyone considered reorganising zorg so it is easier to

Hi, I plan to reorganise our IP management and I'd like to implement a slave DHCP server. Right now we assign IP addresses based on the ethernetadress of a client 1:1. The tutorial here [1] is simple and looks like the thing I need. I do have a lot of subnetworks and my cisco router has an DHCP helper address set. I...

Hi all, I have a large dataset that has >10k entries. The dataset is stored in a dataframe with the headers: SubID Condition1 Condition2 Result1 Result2 There are multiple entries for a given SubID(Subject ID). Condition 1 has 3 levels and condition2 has 2 levels (therefore there are 6 possible combinations all together e.g. Cond1 Level1 x Cond2 Level 1 etc.) and i need to compute for 1. The

...G, then for existing (matching hash) files, it only needs to alter metadata (name, location, chmod etc...) saving plenty of bandwidth Okay destination has to handle this, I expect the rsync daemon has to handle server side file hashing. We would have a clever tool to replicate data who only been reorganised with no changes on the files themselves. No need to resync the whole structure if you added a dir in the path, or someone renamed this particular heavy file this may save big data on automatic backups, ftp mirrors etc... What do you think about it? --smart ? -------------- next pa...

Hello everyone, Zorg is a common code for multiple different buildbot setups. This is why it sits in its own subtree. The only tricky thing there is that it assumes some relative position of zorg and master setup. Documenting this would save somebody some time. All together wasn't a problem so far. But having a better documentation and a set of files for a simple local setup is a good idea.

On 04/08/2014 16:20, Dmitri Gribenko wrote: > On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Dan Liew <dan at su-root.co.uk> wrote: >>>> Second, is there a simple way to test the builder and config before I >>>> commit >>>> it? >>> >>> I am afraid not. >>> >> >> But there is a ugly (and certainly not simple) way to partially test

After a reorganisation of patches, and sending a bunch of them to Chris, I''ve also updated the integration branch to match that. It''s available from: http://git.darksatanic.net/repo/btrfs-progs-unstable.git/ integration-20110630 The shortlog of 17 patches in this branch beyond the ones I''ve sent to Chris is below. Hugo. Andreas Philipp (1): print parent

On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 17:14 +0000, you wrote: > What API did you use in 3.2? llvm::Linker used to have a method LinkInLibrary(). My understanding is that there's a larger reorganisation of the linking process going on but I haven't found a straight-forward replacement for that method yet. I might be missing something though. Or perhaps I could even just reuse some code from that old

Hi, The rcompletion package, originally intended to provide completion for readline-based R interfaces, has undergone a number of changes. These changes are summarised below: o Reorganisation: - The package has been split into two. All the completion code has been moved to a pure R package called 'rcompgen'. 'rcompletion' now requires 'rcompgen' and

Hi, Can anyone tell me how I can compile R from source under Windows environemtn (I kind of know how to do it in a UNIX enviroment)? What I mean is, suppose I make some changes in the R base, or reorganising the libraries, and want to compile into a Setup.exe file (like the one located in CRAN), how should I do this? Many thanks in advance... Ko-Kang Wang

Hi, The rcompletion package, originally intended to provide completion for readline-based R interfaces, has undergone a number of changes. These changes are summarised below: o Reorganisation: - The package has been split into two. All the completion code has been moved to a pure R package called 'rcompgen'. 'rcompletion' now requires 'rcompgen' and