search for: rename_intern

...[2004/03/24 15:51:52, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_mv(3723) reply_mv : \New Folder -> \CACA [2004/03/24 15:51:52, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(580) unix_clean_name [/New Folder] [2004/03/24 15:51:52, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(580) unix_clean_name [/CACA] [2004/03/24 15:51:52, 3] smbd/reply.c:rename_internals(3515) rename_internals: case_sensitive = 0, case_preserve = 1, short case preserve = 0, directory = ./New Folder, newname = ./caca, newname_last_component = caca, is_8_3 = 0 [2004/03/24 15:51:52, 3] smbd/reply.c:rename_internals(3609) rename_internals: succeeded doing rename on ./New Folder...

...sharing(conn,fname,True)) { + DEBUG(4, ("can_rename: sharing violation\n")); return NT_STATUS_SHARING_VIOLATION; + } + DEBUG(4, ("can_rename: returning OK\n")); return NT_STATUS_OK; } @@ -3651,9 +3658,16 @@ *directory = *mask = 0; + DEBUG(3, ("rename_internals: entering\n" + " name == %s\n" + " newname == %s\n", + name, newname)); + rc = unix_convert(name,conn,0,&bad_path1,&sbuf1); unix_convert(newname,conn,newname_last_component,&bad_path2,&sbuf2); +...

...n anyone help me begin troubleshooting this? I'd really like for smb to be completely reliable... Here is copy of the log.smbd @ log level 3 - I have excerpted the section regarding renaming the directory: ------ WHEN RENAME FAILS (Mac 2): ------ [2011/01/19 19:56:32, 3] smbd/reply.c:5949(rename_internals) rename_internals: case_sensitive = 0, case_preserve = 1, short case preserve = 1, directory = data/FOLDERR, newname = data/FOLDER, last_component_dest = FOLDER [2011/01/19 19:56:32, 3] smbd/vfs.c:865(check_reduced_name) reduce_name [data/FOLDERR] [/mnt/store] [2011/01/19 19:56:32, 3] smbd...

...nix_convert called on file "ABCDEF.TXT" [2004/06/17 11:37:40, 5] smbd/filename.c:unix_convert(177) unix_convert begin: name = abcdef.txt, dirpath = , start = abcdef.txt [2004/06/17 11:37:40, 5] smbd/filename.c:unix_convert(312) New file abcdef.txt [2004/06/17 11:37:40, 3] smbd/reply.c:rename_internals(3693) rename_internals: case_sensitive = 0, case_preserve = 1, short case preserve = 0, directory = ./Neu Textdatei.txt, newname = ./abcdef.txt, last_component_dest = abcdef.txt, is_8_3 = 0 [2004/06/17 11:37:40, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(685) switch message SMBmv (pid 732) [2004/0...

...CAS EXCELDOC\GATEWAY\gtepub98.xlw [2000/03/22 15:00:30, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(608) unix_clean_name [/MONICAS EXCELDOC/GATEWAY/EC357000] [2000/03/22 15:00:30, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(608) unix_clean_name [/MONICAS EXCELDOC/GATEWAY/gtepub98.xlw] [2000/03/22 15:00:30, 3] smbd/reply.c:rename_internals(3586) rename_internals: case_sensitive = 0, case_preserve = 1, short case preserve = 1, directory = monicas exceldoc/gateway/EC357000, newname = monicas exceldoc/gateway/gtepub98.xlw, newnam e_last_component = gtepub98.xlw, is_8_3 = 1 [2000/03/22 15:00:30, 3] smbd/reply.c:rename_internals(364...

...lyTest.txt, dirpath = clifford/profile/My Documents/SMBTEST, start = ReadOnlyTest.txt [2004/02/24 10:55:38, 5] smbd/filename.c:unix_convert(314) New file ReadOnlyTest.txt [2004/02/24 10:55:38, 5] smbd/mangle_hash.c:is_8_3(368) Checking prf305.tmp for 8.3 [2004/02/24 10:55:38, 3] smbd/reply.c:rename_internals(3948) rename_internals: case_sensitive = 0, case_preserve = 1, short case preserve = 1, directory = clifford/profile/My Documents/SMBTEST/prf305.tmp, newname = clifford/profile/My Documents/SMBTEST/ReadOnlyTest.txt, newname_last_component = ReadOnlyTest.txt, mangle_is_8_3 = 1 [2004/02/24 10:5...

Hi, I have a samba 2.2.2 on HP-UX 11, serving a few printers. When I install a new driver via win2000' printer properties dialogue it works fine. When I try to do the same from unix with the imprints package, ist screwed. The driver files get uploaded, but they don't register as an installed driver, with rpcclient 'enumdrivers' I don't 'see' them. When I set the

Hi, anybody knows, what the last entry in this log mean?: [2004/11/07 16:51:50, 3] smbd/reply.c:rename_internals(3777) rename_internals: case_sensitive = 0, case_preserve = 1, short case preserve = 1, directory = ./Neu Textdatei.txt, newname = ./???.txt, last_component_dest = ???.txt, is_8_3 = 0 [2004/11/07 16:51:50, 3] smbd/dosmode.c:unix_mode(111) unix_mode(./Neu Textdatei.txt) returning 0777 [2004/...

Hi folks, I've got a serious problem with samba since I upgrade an stone-age caldera-box with a 2.0.x-samba to redhat-7.2 with 2.2.1a-samba. I can create, delete directories and files without any problems. But renaming them (i.e. by creating a new folder which has new folder as default) does not work. I always get an error, that the file does not exist. I am trying from a win2k-professional

...1:50:32, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(1378) switch message SMBmv (pid 13672) conn 0x7f17e59acfa0 [2009/09/10 01:50:32, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_mv(6104) reply_mv : piazza_doc/09-07-03.Business_Plan/Neuer Ordner -> piazza_doc/09-07-03.Business_Plan/test [2009/09/10 01:50:32, 3] smbd/reply.c:rename_internals(5832) rename_internals: case_sensitive = 0, case_preserve = 1, short case preserve = 1, directory = piazza_doc/09-07-03.Business_Plan/Neuer Ordner, newname = piazza_doc/09-07-03.Business_Plan/test, last_component_dest = test, is_8_3 = 0 [2009/09/10 01:50:32, 3] smbd/reply.c:rename_internals_fs...

...he function 'rename', (in the case when the destination file isn't opened), boiled down to calling the function 'MoveFileExW' with the MOVEFILE_COPY_ALLOWED flag set, allowing renaming files across the volumes. The current implementation of the function 'rename' (in 'rename_internal'), essentially calls 'SetFileInformationByHandle'. This function is fast and atomic, so in a sense, it's an improvement over the previously used 'MoveFileExW'. However, 'SetFileInformationByHandle' doesn't work when the source and destination are located on the...

...error. It gives the errors AFTER it copies all the files to the server... Here's the log.spleen (my win2k is spleen): unix_clean_name [W32X86/PSCRIPT.NTF] [2003/08/08 16:46:05, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(580) unix_clean_name [W32X86/3/PSCRIPT.NTF] [2003/08/08 16:46:05, 3] smbd/reply.c:rename_internals(3196) rename_internals: case_sensitive = 0, case_preserve = 1, short case preserve = 1, directory = W32X86/PSCRIPT.NTF, newname = W32X86/3/PSCRIPT.NTF, newname_last_component = PSCRIPT.NTF, is_8_3 = 0 [2003/08/08 16:46:05, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(580) unix_clean_name [W32X86/PSCRIPT.NT...

...rename', (in the case when the destination > file isn't opened), boiled down to calling the function 'MoveFileExW' with > the MOVEFILE_COPY_ALLOWED flag set, allowing renaming files across the > volumes. > The current implementation of the function ‘rename’ (in > 'rename_internal'), essentially calls 'SetFileInformationByHandle'. This > function is fast and atomic, so in a sense, it's an improvement over the > previously used 'MoveFileExW'. However, 'SetFileInformationByHandle' > doesn't work when the source and destination are...

..., the function 'rename', (in the case when the destination file isn't opened), boiled down to calling the function 'MoveFileExW' with the MOVEFILE_COPY_ALLOWED flag set, allowing renaming files across the volumes. > The current implementation of the function ‘rename’ (in 'rename_internal'), essentially calls 'SetFileInformationByHandle'. This function is fast and atomic, so in a sense, it's an improvement over the previously used 'MoveFileExW'. However, 'SetFileInformationByHandle' doesn't work when the source and destination are located on the...

...e function 'rename', (in the case when the destination file isn't opened), boiled down to calling the function 'MoveFileExW' with the MOVEFILE_COPY_ALLOWED flag set, allowing renaming files across the volumes. >> The current implementation of the function ‘rename’ (in 'rename_internal'), essentially calls 'SetFileInformationByHandle'. This function is fast and atomic, so in a sense, it's an improvement over the previously used 'MoveFileExW'. However, 'SetFileInformationByHandle' doesn't work when the source and destination are located on the...

...15079, the function 'rename', (in the case when the destination file isn't opened), boiled down to calling the function 'MoveFileExW' with the MOVEFILE_COPY_ALLOWED flag set, allowing renaming files across the volumes. The current implementation of the function ‘rename’ (in 'rename_internal'), essentially calls 'SetFileInformationByHandle'. This function is fast and atomic, so in a sense, it's an improvement over the previously used 'MoveFileExW'. However, 'SetFileInformationByHandle' doesn't work when the source and destination are located on the...

...15079, the function 'rename', (in the case when the destination file isn't opened), boiled down to calling the function 'MoveFileExW' with the MOVEFILE_COPY_ALLOWED flag set, allowing renaming files across the volumes. The current implementation of the function ‘rename’ (in 'rename_internal'), essentially calls 'SetFileInformationByHandle'. This function is fast and atomic, so in a sense, it's an improvement over the previously used 'MoveFileExW'. However, 'SetFileInformationByHandle' doesn't work when the source and destination are located on the...

...e', (in the case when the destination > file isn't opened), boiled down to calling the function 'MoveFileExW' with > the MOVEFILE_COPY_ALLOWED flag set, allowing renaming files across the > volumes. > > The current implementation of the function ‘rename’ (in > 'rename_internal'), essentially calls 'SetFileInformationByHandle'. This > function is fast and atomic, so in a sense, it's an improvement over the > previously used 'MoveFileExW'. However, 'SetFileInformationByHandle' > doesn't work when the source and destination are...

...; /* We're only going to fail here if it's access denied, as that's the only error we care about for "can we delete this ?" questions. */ if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status) && (NT_STATUS_EQUAL(status,NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED) || @@ -1888,8 +1888,14 @@ status = rename_internals(conn, fsp->fsp_name, new_name, 0, replace_if_exists, path_contains_wcard); - if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) + + if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) { + if (open_was_deferred(SVAL(inbuf,smb_mid))) { + /* We have re-scheduled this call. */ + return -1; + } return ERROR_NT(status); + }...

...; /* We're only going to fail here if it's access denied, as that's the only error we care about for "can we delete this ?" questions. */ if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status) && (NT_STATUS_EQUAL(status,NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED) || @@ -1888,8 +1888,14 @@ status = rename_internals(conn, fsp->fsp_name, new_name, 0, replace_if_exists, path_contains_wcard); - if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) + + if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) { + if (open_was_deferred(SVAL(inbuf,smb_mid))) { + /* We have re-scheduled this call. */ + return -1; + } return ERROR_NT(status); + }...