search for: rematchdefinit

Hello all, Let me try this again with some code. I am trying to make a new object and it's not working. I get : Error in rematchDefinition(definition, fdef, mnames, fnames, signature) : methods can add arguments to the generic only if '...' is an argument to the generic as my error. I have included my code. It is from the xcms package. Any help would be great even if it's just telling me what the error means. I...

...) {conformMethod() is only called in ? ? > one place in our code base, namely from setMethod()} : as a matter of fact, I've been brave for now, left the change to conformMethod()? and started to fix the constructed .local() calls which are created in? conformMethod()'s sibling, which is rematchDefinition(). It seems that this builds e.g. Matrix {with its gazillion setMethod()s} and that continues to run its own tests.? OTOH, Matrix may not trigger the situations that are dealt with here at all, as the signature() are rarely longer than three, and at some point in time I had made long passes thr...

...) {conformMethod() is only called in > one place in our code base, namely from setMethod()} : as a matter of fact, I've been brave for now, left the change to conformMethod() and started to fix the constructed .local() calls which are created in conformMethod()'s sibling, which is rematchDefinition(). It seems that this builds e.g. Matrix {with its gazillion setMethod()s} and that continues to run its own tests. OTOH, Matrix may not trigger the situations that are dealt with here at all, as the signature() are rarely longer than three, and at some point in time I had made long passes thr...

...with an as.character method following the above usage, but I get the below error telling me that ... isn't in the generic for as.character. > setClass("tmp", "numeric") > setMethod("as.character", "tmp", function(x, ...) paste(x, c(...))) Error in rematchDefinition(definition, fdef, mnames, fnames, signature) : Methods can add arguments to the generic only if "..." is an argument to the generic Am I reading the documentation incorrectly? How do I correctly pass the ... object to the method for this "tmp" object? However I note that...

...with an as.character method following the above usage, but I get the below error telling me that ... isn't in the generic for as.character. > setClass("tmp", "numeric") > setMethod("as.character", "tmp", function(x, ...) paste(x, c(...))) Error in rematchDefinition(definition, fdef, mnames, fnames, signature) : Methods can add arguments to the generic only if "..." is an argument to the generic Am I reading the documentation incorrectly? How do I correctly pass the ... object to the method for this "tmp" object? However I note that...

...) {conformMethod() is only called in > one place in our code base, namely from setMethod()} : as a matter of fact, I've been brave for now, left the change to conformMethod() and started to fix the constructed .local() calls which are created in conformMethod()'s sibling, which is rematchDefinition(). It seems that this builds e.g. Matrix {with its gazillion setMethod()s} and that continues to run its own tests. OTOH, Matrix may not trigger the situations that are dealt with here at all, as the signature() are rarely longer than three, and at some point in time I had made long passes thr...

.... I have tried setMethod("$", signature(x="myclass"), function(x,slotname){ x at slotname } ) This produced the error message: In method for function "$": expanding the signature to include omitted arguments in definition: name = "missing" Error in rematchDefinition(definition, fdef, mnames, fnames, signature) : methods can add arguments to the generic only if '...' is an argument to the generic My searches for a solution of this problem have not been successful. Can someone help? Thanks and regards, Ulrike Gr??mping, Berlin

>>>>> Martin Maechler >>>>> on Sat, 29 Jun 2019 10:33:10 +0200 writes: >>>>> peter dalgaard >>>>> on Fri, 28 Jun 2019 16:20:03 +0200 writes: >> > On 28 Jun 2019, at 16:03 , Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote: >> > >> >>>>>> Henrik Bengtsson

...consistently, thanks to suggestions by Suharto Anggono. * conformMethod() now works correctly in cases containing a "&& logic" bug, reported by Henrik Bengtsson. It now creates methods with "missing" entries in the signature. Consequently, rematchDefinition() is amended to use appropriate .local() calls with named arguments where needed. * format.default(*, scientific = FALSE) now corresponds to a practically most extreme options(scipen = n) setting rather than arbitrary n = 100. * format(as.symbol("foo")) now...

...consistently, thanks to suggestions by Suharto Anggono. * conformMethod() now works correctly in cases containing a "&& logic" bug, reported by Henrik Bengtsson. It now creates methods with "missing" entries in the signature. Consequently, rematchDefinition() is amended to use appropriate .local() calls with named arguments where needed. * format.default(*, scientific = FALSE) now corresponds to a practically most extreme options(scipen = n) setting rather than arbitrary n = 100. * format(as.symbol("foo")) now...

...consistently, thanks to suggestions by Suharto Anggono. * conformMethod() now works correctly in cases containing a "&& logic" bug, reported by Henrik Bengtsson. It now creates methods with "missing" entries in the signature. Consequently, rematchDefinition() is amended to use appropriate .local() calls with named arguments where needed. * format.default(*, scientific = FALSE) now corresponds to a practically most extreme options(scipen = n) setting rather than arbitrary n = 100. * format(as.symbol("foo")) now...