search for: reman

...ould be zero. I am doing the following for( i in 1:length(C$weight)) { C$w[C$state[i]==C1$state & C$psu[i]==C1$psu] <- C1$w[C$state[i] == C1$state & C$psu[i] == C1$psu] } This gives me the correct replacements for the number of rows in C1 and then just repeats the same weights for the remaning rows in C. Can someone point out the error in what I am doing or show the correct way of doing this? Thanks, Renuka

hi, (assume HTB) I was thinking will it be possible to do some sort of UNFAIR-SHARING :"), what I have in mind : Say I have a internet link with 100kbits bandwith, then I want to share it between many clients (which will increase over time). Let''s i start with 5 clients with rate = 30kbits... See the total bandwith of users is 120kbits but I have only 100kbits.... So where is the

...= apply(X = dat, MARGIN = 2, FUN = sum)[2:length(apply(X = dat, MARGIN = 2, FUN = sum))] ) ## First column: which sample, 1-100 ## Second column: number selected in that sample ## How many items were previously sampled? ## For 1st sample, it's 0 ## For 2nd sample, code is different than for remaning samples n.prev.sampled <- c(0, rep(NA, n.samples-1)) n.prev.sampled n.prev.sampled[2] <- sum(ifelse(test = dat[,3] == 1 & dat[,2] == 1, yes = 1, no = 0)) n.prev.sampled for(i in 4:ncol(dat)) { n.prev.sampled[i-1] &lt...

...nux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: nft AssignedTo: pablo at netfilter.org ReportedBy: anarey.spam at gmail.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 You can add a set with a long name (16 or more characters) but "nft" remanes it to another name with 15 characters without showing a error message. thenameofthissetistoolong (25 characters) => thenameofthisse (15 characters)(It is not OK) thisnamewith0016 (16 characters)=> thisnamewith001 (15 characters) (It is not OK) thisnamewith015 (15 characters)=> thisname...

On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 4:25 PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > It has to be said it would be really convenient to have a 'zero' > and/or 'trim' method of some sort. > 'trim' means discard? Currently we cannot support discard on block storage since ovirt may need to wipe lvs when deleting a disk, and discarding may leave unwiped user data.

...may > need to wipe lvs when deleting a disk, and discarding may leave > unwiped user data. This may change in 4.3 if we switch to wipe on > creation instead of wipe after delete. I think this depends on BLKDISCARDZEROES[1] for the block device? Of course if you're worried about data remanence for someone who has access to the physical device then that wouldn't be enough. [1] https://rwmj.wordpress.com/2014/03/11/blkdiscard-blkzeroout-blkdiscardzeroes-blksecdiscard/ > POST /images/ticket-id ... > ... > { > "op": "zero", > "offset&...

...ble with "Hello\rWorld"-like string value, I can see this string passed in SIP MESSAGE like this : Content-Type: text/plain Content-Length: 12 Hello\rWorld Unfortunately, this string (and other variations) are literally displayed (I hoped to use \r to erase Hello word and see only the remaning World on my phone screen). Is there a way to format text embedded in SIP MESSAGES or work around this ? Any hint or advice ? Regards -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20090407/f364a4d0/at...

...ngth(apply(X = dat, MARGIN = 2, FUN = sum))] > ) > > ## First column: which sample, 1-100 > ## Second column: number selected in that sample > > > ## How many items were previously sampled? > ## For 1st sample, it's 0 > ## For 2nd sample, code is different than for remaning samples > > n.prev.sampled <- c(0, rep(NA, n.samples-1)) > n.prev.sampled > > n.prev.sampled[2] <- sum(ifelse(test = dat[,3] == 1 & dat[,2] == 1, > yes = 1, > no = 0)) > > n.prev.sampled > &...

...> ## First column: which sample, 1-100 > > > ## Second column: number selected in that sample > > > > > > > > > ## How many items were previously sampled? > > > ## For 1st sample, it's 0 > > > ## For 2nd sample, code is different than for remaning samples > > > > > > n.prev.sampled <- c(0, rep(NA, n.samples-1)) > > > n.prev.sampled > > > > > > n.prev.sampled[2] <- sum(ifelse(test = dat[,3] == 1 & dat[,2] == 1, > > > yes = 1, > > >...

[Andrew: please subscribe to the nut-upsuser list: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser Also, please gzip any attached logs.] > Hello, > > I downloaded NUT ver 2.6.2 and tried it on my Linux development > board. when I configure and it notified me that "USB drivers > requested, but libusb not found." > Then I download libusb

...Neither could others btw., as you can see from the posts (the best thing we can do is something that only works with some players and it doesn't work on my ubuntu...). So I realized I need firm control of what is happening, and theora so far is giving me this control and it just works. The only remaning part is sound, I'll work on this soon. Ondrej

...UN = sum))] >> ) >> >> ## First column: which sample, 1-100 >> ## Second column: number selected in that sample >> >> >> ## How many items were previously sampled? >> ## For 1st sample, it's 0 >> ## For 2nd sample, code is different than for remaning samples >> >> n.prev.sampled <- c(0, rep(NA, n.samples-1)) >> n.prev.sampled >> >> n.prev.sampled[2] <- sum(ifelse(test = dat[,3] == 1 & dat[,2] == 1, >> yes = 1, >> no = 0)) >&...

Hi, I was discussing the common practice of disk eradication used by many firms for security. I was thinking this may be a useful feature of ZFS to have an option to eradicate data as its removed, meaning after the last reference/snapshot is done and a block is freed, then write the eradication patterns back to the removed blocks. By any chance, has this been discussed or considered before?

Hi 1. Is it possible to load an initrd from initramfs ? How would you do this if the initramfs is being loaded dynamically in the kernel (ie having the initramfs as initrd ) Because in this case, you will say root = /dev/initrd and specify 'initrd' as your 'initramfs source file' How will you specify the second initrd source? Thanks Rachita.

...vs when deleting a disk, and discarding may leave > > unwiped user data. This may change in 4.3 if we switch to wipe on > > creation instead of wipe after delete. > > I think this depends on BLKDISCARDZEROES[1] for the block device? Of > course if you're worried about data remanence for someone who has > access to the physical device then that wouldn't be enough. > BLKDISCARDZEROES was never reliable and it was removed from the kernel recently. Please check https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9903757/ We are not relying on it since ovirt 4.2, hopefully also in 4....

So we don't ever have to worry about drivers touching drm_dp_mst_port structs without verifying them and crashing again. Lyude Paul (6): drm/dp_mst: Add drm_dp_get_payload_info() drm/nouveau: Use drm_dp_get_payload_info() for getting payload/vcpi drm/nouveau: Stop reading port->mgr in nv50_mstc_get_modes() drm/nouveau: Stop reading port->mgr in nv50_mstc_detect() drm/dp_mst: