search for: relegating

A search of the archives did not reveal an answer: For basic tests of association, where one has no a priori knowledge of the form of the relation or of the distributions of the variables, rank correlation seems like a good start. Why is cor.test() with Kendall and Spearman options relegated to the ctest package, rather than in the base package? Does this suggest that the developers consider

On Aug 26, 2009, at 4:09 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: [...] > > The second part of this is that there are a lot of reasons for things > to be defined inline in C++ even if we don't want it to actually be > inlined. I don't think those are _good_ reasons though: If one doesn't want a C+ + function to be inlined, one shouldn't define it inline. > For example,

I created a client library to send emails for a webapp. After connecting to the SMTP server with credential setup in CPANEL, and then do NOT add Message-Id header, the DKIM signature 'h' record created by dovecot/WHM is wrong, and a Message-ID (with a capital D) header is added, invalidating the generated DKIM signature value. This causes outlook, yahoo, gmail and other email

My first ARM testing results or lack of them indicate that 3.0 release requires some some beefy machines to build. It is not so much raw cpu speed but memory and lots of it. My builds got to linking llc and at that point linker started eating megabytes of memory like chocolate. So sadly chumbys, beagleboards, iThingis(?), Raspberry Pis, Gumstix and even inexpensive Tegra2 boards seem to be out of

On Aug 26, 2009, at 2:31 PM, David Vandevoorde wrote: > > >> I know/hope that the proposal isn't for the inlinehint to be a >> synonym >> for "force inline", it would just raise the threshold to increase the >> likeliness that it would be inlined. The question is whether >> "something being c++ inline" in any way is really

Ok, so, things are complicated. The PAM standard insists on password aging being done after account authorization, which comes after user authentication. Kerberos can't authenticate users whose passwords are expired. So PAM_KRB5 implementations tend to return PAM_SUCCESS from pam_krb5:pam_sm_authenticate() and arrange for pam_krb5:pam_sm_acct_mgmt() to return PAM_NEW_AUTHTOK_REQD, as

On Aug 26, 2009, at 12:01 PM, Devang Patel wrote: >>> I do not understand how the "inlinehint" will help. How will it >>> influence the inliner ? >> >> The hint should make it more attractive to inline. I don't know >> the details >> yet and they will require some experimenting. >> > > In that case you want to add hint to A

?I want to take advantage of my multicore CPU to speed up a loop in a simulation program.? I didn?t write the code, but the iterations appear independent to me, at least in the sense that the results of one loop do not depend on previous ones.? Right now I?m relegated to a Windows box that runs Windows 7.? These appear to be the options: ? Pnmath-appears to parallelize non-BLAS routine but

On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Evan Cheng<evan.cheng at apple.com> wrote: > > On Aug 26, 2009, at 2:31 PM, David Vandevoorde wrote: > >> >> >>> I know/hope that the proposal isn't for the inlinehint to be a >>> synonym >>> for "force inline", it would just raise the threshold to increase the >>> likeliness that it would

On 10/17/2011 09:20 AM, Pawel Wodnicki wrote: > > My first ARM testing results or lack of them indicate > that 3.0 release requires some some beefy machines to build. > It is not so much raw cpu speed but memory and lots of it. > My builds got to linking llc and at that point linker started > eating megabytes of memory like chocolate. > > So sadly chumbys, beagleboards,

Greetings, I spent the better part of a day tracking down a rather annoying problem. I would like someone more knowledgeable than myself to confirm this diagnosis. I have a RH 8.0 Linux box with three NICS. I had been developing it testing with an XP box. Everything seemed groovy. Today I went to put it into "production" and Win98 clients were having all sorts of problems.

On 9 Jan 2013, at 04:49, Marc J. Driftmeyer wrote: > It's not a coincidence that GCC 4.2.1 is the baseline on FreeBSD considering the licensing of GPL restrictions on new releases. [With my FreeBSD hat on] Our plan for 10.0 is to ship clang only, with gcc 4.2.1 relegated to a compat package for tier 1 architectures. This should be x86, x86-64, and ARMv6/7 (and maybe v8 if we're very

hi everyone, i feel like this problem should have come up a thousand times before but can't seem to find anything about on google. i am no expert and i don't know much samba lingo but i hope you understand me. If you open a symlink (or hard link for that matter) in windows (2000) over samba, say a blah.doc file, which looks like -rw-rw-r-- 1 francis galexia 2567 Feb 5 12:33

It's not a coincidence that GCC 4.2.1 is the baseline on FreeBSD considering the licensing of GPL restrictions on new releases. - Marc On 01/08/2013 04:46 PM, Krzysztof Parzyszek wrote: > On 1/8/2013 5:45 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: >> >> some version of Clang and later (Freebsd folks?). > > FreeBSD 9.1 uses GCC 4.2.1 and Clang 3.0, although I have some doubts > about

Hi all! I'm working on a project that, funnily enough, involves clustering and "winbindd". Specifically, we have a 2-node cluster configured in an active-active configuration whereby both servers are running Samba, each "exporting" different filesystems that are backed on a shared storage subsystem such that at any given time, one node can takeover from the other. The

David Vandevoorde a écrit : > > I don't think those are _good_ reasons though: If one doesn't want a C+ > + function to be inlined, one shouldn't define it inline. > > You must not have written a lot of C++ template then. You don't have the choice in this case, just check your STL header. > > FWIW, I've been involved in a couple of attempts by

On Monday 26 November 2007 16:21, Gordon Henriksen wrote: > Try 'Llvm_analysis.assert_valid_module m;' before you write bitcode to > figure out where things went awry. ('dump_module m;' may also help.) > GIGO applies (but garbage-in/segfault-out is more likely). Ok, thanks for the tip. > Unfortunately, even if the bindings were more strongly typed, it would > still

R-Listers. The following is a rant originally sent privately to Frank Harrell in response to remarks he made on this list. The ideas are not new or original, but he suggested I share it with the list, as he felt that it might be of wider interest, nonetheless. I have real doubts about this, and I apologize in advance to those who agree that I should have kept my remarks private. In view of this,

...ssed by various legislatures forever. That window is closing, and the bottom of the window looks very much like a guillotine blade - don't have your head in the wrong place. In any case, as has been discussed on -users before (which is where this thread should go, and thus where I'm relegating it) that spoofing caller ID, your postal mailing address, your name, your voice, or anything else is equally illegal and prosecutable if used for fraudulent purposes. JT At 10:58 AM -0700 9/23/05, Gilmore, Gerry wrote: >Hhhhmmm, I stand corrected. I'm surprised that >the carriers...

Hello List! I have a Samba AD domain with two virtualized DC's running 4.1.15 and 4.1.17. I have had two member file servers with odd permissions problems that I've now given up on, and decided to start fresh. I have created a File server (FS3) with Debian wheezy, built samba 4.1.17 from source, with configure options of : --with-ads --with-shared-modules=idmap_ad ... and placed the