search for: delegating

On 8/18/2015 10:46 AM, Alessio Cecchi wrote: > Hi, > > in this tipical setup (Dovecot/Director thate share Maildir via NFS) on > your NFS Server you have (about) 90% of read operations and only 10% of > write operations. > > If you see detailed stats for NFS operations you have 40-50% of GETATTR, > this means that NFS/Dovecot clients are caching data (mainly dovecot >

Hi, Just out of curiosity what is in nfsv4 delegation that you think would give a benefit on your configuration? If I read back the thread you seem to have dovecot configured with director ring in front of the backends. In that case Dovecot already manages storage in a way that only one of the backends is accessing each users data at a time. So I can?t see anything but problems form enabling

...others. Delegation is meant to avoid to give "Domain admins" role to anybody. Delegation is meant to allow some groups to do some tasks, but not all tasks. Delegation is complex as there are lot of roles into AD. Fortunately it is also well documented for most of standard delegations as delegating the possibility to join members or the possibility to modify accounts, these are standard tasks for L1 people. I didn't managed the delegation to join computers to our domain, a colleague did. The tools he used: - redircmp: change the default container where joined computers are stored. - netd...

Hi, in this tipical setup (Dovecot/Director thate share Maildir via NFS) on your NFS Server you have (about) 90% of read operations and only 10% of write operations. If you see detailed stats for NFS operations you have 40-50% of GETATTR, this means that NFS/Dovecot clients are caching data (mainly dovecot index files) but they have to revalidate the cache frequently asking to the NFS

Hi all, Playing with delegation today we delegated rights to some user on some OU and its contents for it can modify users inside that OU and children. We used "advanced view" in ADUC then "properties" on our delegated OU, then "security" tab, and finally we gave rights to our user. Perhaps this process is not correct but we believe it is a valid process to delegate

just a quick update: no issues with NFSv4.0 (load is slowly growing, currently ~7k mailboxes) instead, bad news from delegation front, we enabled it for a couple of days but we ran in ugly issues: processes went in "uninterruptible sleep" state, load average gets huge, reboot was the only escape :-( -brd Alessio Cecchi wrote: > Il 12/06/2015 13:02, brd ha scritto: > >Alessio

List: Sorry for posting to this list but could not find step by step instructions anywhere nor get any concerned list to respond. Newbie to DNS technicals but can work with instructions if given in ./configure for complete idiots ;-) 1. I have taken a static IP from my ISP 203.134.221.162 and the ISP has put up an entry in APNIC whois (please check the same)...to me it seems incomplete, as it

...; this on the sssd mailing list. >>> >>> Rowland >>> >>> >> No, Rowland. I'm not asking for help with SSSD. It's working quite >> fine. And so is winbind. And both are running fine together. I'm >> asking if there is another way of delegating administrator access to >> a Sambaserver. A more elegant way than what I have described. >> >> I would be grateful if you could share your thoughts. >> >> /Davor >> > > How about this: > > ssh into the DC, either as root or as a user that can use sud...

...>>>> Rowland >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> No, Rowland. I'm not asking for help with SSSD. It's working quite >>>> fine. And so is winbind. And both are running fine together. I'm asking if >>>> there is another way of delegating administrator access to a Sambaserver. A >>>> more elegant way than what I have described. >>>> >>>> I would be grateful if you could share your thoughts. >>>> >>>> /Davor >>>> >>>> >>> How about this: >...

hi all, i'm managing a large installation of a dovecot cluster in director + NFS backend architecture and we are moving from NFSv3 to NFSv4. Our NFS server is a Netapp in clustered mode and reading technical specs of NFSv4 delegation feature it seems that enabling delegation in this type of dovecot architecture should bring great benefits: only one backend server access a specific mailbox at a

Il 18/08/2015 17:25, Tom Talpey ha scritto: > On 8/18/2015 10:46 AM, Alessio Cecchi wrote: >> Hi, >> >> in this tipical setup (Dovecot/Director thate share Maildir via NFS) on >> your NFS Server you have (about) 90% of read operations and only 10% of >> write operations. >> >> If you see detailed stats for NFS operations you have 40-50% of GETATTR,

...>>>> >>>>>>> No, Rowland. I'm not asking for help with SSSD. It's working quite >>>>>> fine. And so is winbind. And both are running fine together. I'm >>>>>> asking if >>>>>> there is another way of delegating administrator access to a >>>>>> Sambaserver. A >>>>>> more elegant way than what I have described. >>>>>> >>>>>> I would be grateful if you could share your thoughts. >>>>>> >>>>>> /Davor &...

...gt;> >>>>>> >>>>>> No, Rowland. I'm not asking for help with SSSD. It's working quite >>>>> fine. And so is winbind. And both are running fine together. I'm >>>>> asking if >>>>> there is another way of delegating administrator access to a >>>>> Sambaserver. A >>>>> more elegant way than what I have described. >>>>> >>>>> I would be grateful if you could share your thoughts. >>>>> >>>>> /Davor >>>>> >...

Hi, Following that link https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/932455 we created a delegation to permit some group to add computers into AD. That works except if some computer with same name was already added (even if this computer with same name was previously cleanly removed from AD). Anyone who has idea what we missed? Cheers, M.

ZFS Fans, Here''s a list of features that we are proposing for Solaris 10u5. Keep in mind that this is subject to change. Features: PSARC 2007/142 zfs rename -r PSARC 2007/171 ZFS Separate Intent Log PSARC 2007/197 ZFS hotplug PSARC 2007/199 zfs {create,clone,rename} -p PSARC 2007/283 FMA for ZFS Phase 2 PSARC/2006/465 ZFS Delegated Administration PSARC/2006/577 zpool property to

...t. >>>> >>>> Rowland >>>> >>>> >>>> No, Rowland. I'm not asking for help with SSSD. It's working quite >>> fine. And so is winbind. And both are running fine together. I'm asking if >>> there is another way of delegating administrator access to a Sambaserver. A >>> more elegant way than what I have described. >>> >>> I would be grateful if you could share your thoughts. >>> >>> /Davor >>> >>> >> How about this: >> >> ssh into the DC, e...

...>>>>>>>> No, Rowland. I'm not asking for help with SSSD. It's working quite >>>>>>> fine. And so is winbind. And both are running fine together. I'm >>>>>>> asking if >>>>>>> there is another way of delegating administrator access to a >>>>>>> Sambaserver. A >>>>>>> more elegant way than what I have described. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I would be grateful if you could share your thoughts. >>>>>>> >>>&...

...but they involve not using sssd. You may get help with this on > the sssd mailing list. > > Rowland > > No, Rowland. I'm not asking for help with SSSD. It's working quite fine. And so is winbind. And both are running fine together. I'm asking if there is another way of delegating administrator access to a Sambaserver. A more elegant way than what I have described. I would be grateful if you could share your thoughts. /Davor

This is not a big deal, but DelegateClass fails with rspec when methods are defined in the the delegating class. Here''s code that demonstrates: require ''delegate'' gem ''rspec'' # Version 1.0.5 ############################################################ # CONTROL EXAMPLE: Works FINE. ############################################################ class Inherit...

Hi all! We have got many delegations in our AD. To add a certain administrator group to the local Administrators group you can use GPO for Windowsservers. As Samba does not understand GPO I have initially used the "username map" feature to add a domain account to become root. After the appropriate group is added via Computer Management MMC by the delegated administrator, the line