search for: reinhild

Hi all, I've been looking for an answer for this issue but Google didn't help. So I resource to the next best thing: the Samba mailing list. Question: Is there a way to automaticaly, after a certain amount of time, unlock a file after, for example, a client crash or network problem? I know how to do it manually of course, but that is, well, cumbersome. I've looked at

...gt; > which should remove the connection after 5 minutes. See "man 7 tcp" > for the meaning of those values. > > Volker > > -- > SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofsallee 1b, 37081 Göttingen > phone: 0551-370000-0, mailto:kontakt at sernet.de > Gesch.F.: Dr. Johannes Loxen und Reinhild Jung > AG Göttingen: HR-B 2816 - http://www.sernet.de >

On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 23:32:30 +0100 William Edwards via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi Joachim, > > > Op 15 feb 2024 om 23:09 heeft Joachim Lindenberg via samba > > <samba at lists.samba.org> het volgende geschreven: > > > > ?Hi Rowland, > > No, I don?t have so many devices yet. > > Rowland believes that one should not use IPv6

James Wright <12wrigja at gmail.com> 9:56 PM (13 minutes ago) to samba Hi Samba users, I have a Samba server with a single share backed by a ZFS pool / collection of datasets. I can correctly navigate around the share, but the free space reporting within clients is inaccurate for various directories, especially those that are themselves setup as datasets in ZFS and have quota applied to

...he actual path being queried. you might have a look at that old patch from https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9371#c0 and see if that works for you. Björn -- SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofsallee 1b, 37081 Göttingen phone: 0551-370000-0, mail: kontakt at sernet.de Gesch.F.: Dr. Johannes Loxen & Reinhild Jung AG Göttingen: HR-B 2816 - https://www.sernet.de

I have an old application that would kick up a warning "File is open - do you want to open in read only mode" on my previous Samba3 NT style domain set up. It's also accessing the file share thru a connection coming thru an VM setup. On my Samba 4 AD setup, I'm not getting the initial read only message. file locking seems to be different. It seems like two concurrent users can

...IPv6 internally earlier this year, see: https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2024-February/248183.html Bj?rn -- SerNet GmbH - Bahnhofsallee 1b - 37081 G?ttingen phone: +495513700000 mailto:contact at sernet.com AG G?ttingen: HR-B 2816 - https://www.sernet.com Manag. Directors Johannes Loxen and Reinhild Jung data privacy policy https://www.sernet.de/privacy

Hi there, I use Samba 4.9 since its releaseday and also had some troubles first due to the lack of informations in the wiki. Anyways... after some try & error i got it working and since i run the Cluster (non-production environment) had no errors except CTDBs monitoring of the Samba process did'nt work as i would expect it (RPC-Server was dead but CTDB did'nt complain and "ctdb

Good day I would like to setup a SMB file server and DC that uses IPv4 and IPv6 dual stack. However I see certain problems; for instance, when the IPv6 prefix is dynamic, this means the IPv6 of the DC would also dynamically change. Is there something special I should consider when provisioning a SAMBA AD DC with IPv6, or will it "just work" ? Thanks, best Tobias

...xid. That way Samba can also assign the ownership of files to a group. The idmap backend has to be able to support XID though, not all idmap backends do so. Björn -- SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofsallee 1b, 37081 Göttingen phone: 0551-370000-0, mail: kontakt at sernet.de Gesch.F.: Dr. Johannes Loxen & Reinhild Jung AG Göttingen: HR-B 2816 - https://www.sernet.de -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 228 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/attachments/20190226/a29b53a1/si...

> Am 23.02.2019 um 22:23 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: >>>>> He also has these: >>>>> >>>>> idmap config * : rangesize = 1000000 >>>>> idmap config * : range = 1000000-19999999 >>>>> idmap config * : backend = autorid >>>>> >>>>> The '*' domain

...erever people have SFU maintained in AD, that is clearly preferrable. For everybody else, I think autorid is just a great idea. But that's mostly me :-) Volker -- SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofsallee 1b, 37081 Göttingen phone: 0551-370000-0, mailto:kontakt at sernet.de Gesch.F.: Dr. Johannes Loxen und Reinhild Jung AG Göttingen: HR-B 2816 - http://www.sernet.de

On 25.02.2019 10:20, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 09:24:24 +0100 > Viktor Trojanovic via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >>>> I'm confused.. how is the choice of the idmap backend related to an >>>> AD DC use case? >>> Only in the case of wanting the same ID everywhere. >> In my understanding, the