Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "regwm".
Did you mean:
regw
2006 Oct 27
3
Marginal Effect larger than 1 for a binary variable (summary.Design after lrm)
...other years)like .98, .
97, with which I am not comfortable either. I suspect I did something
wrong.
This is part of my model:
> resultt1
Logistic Regression Model
lrm(formula = typemort ~ adv_binc_ratio + agem1 + regEA + regEM +
regGL + regN + regNI + regNW + regS + regSW + regW + regWM +
regY + repmethIO + repmethSR + no_dis_no_def + prevLO + prevOO +
prevRP + owning + adv_binc_ratio * (repmethIO + repmethSR +
no_dis_no_def + prevLO + prevOO + prevRP + owning) + agem1 *
(repmethIO + repmethSR + no_dis_no_def + prevLO + prevOO +
prevRP + owning), data...
2007 Jun 26
1
Marginal Effects of continuous variable in lrm model (Design package)
Dear all:
When I am trying to get the marginal effects:
summary(result7,adv_inc_ratio=mean(m9201
$adv_inc_ratio),adv_price_ratio=mean(m9201$adv_price_ratio), ...(SOME
MORE CONTINUOUS AND DISCRETE VARIABLES BUT I AM NOT LISTING)... regW=c
(0,mean(m9201$regW),1), regWM=c(0,mean(m9201$regWM),1))
It gave out an error message:
Error in summary.Design(result7, adv_inc_ratio = mean(m9201
$adv_inc_ratio), :
ranges not defined here or with datadist for adv_inc_ratio
adv_price_ratio agem1 change2 yr1Libor yr1Libor1mtLag yr1Libor1yrLag
change21yrLag change21mtLag...