search for: register_names

I just finished setting up a Linux RedHat 6.1 system with Samba 2.0.5a. I cannot browse the system from a Windows Nt Domain, but I can browse it just fine from another Linux samba system... The line: [2000/01/27 14:41:47, 0] nmbd/nmbd_logonnames.c:become_logon_server_success(118) become_logon_server_success: Samba is now a logon server for workgroup BERKELEY on subnet 127.0.0.1 looks

Hi... I have exactly the same problem with lsarpcd giving the error "ERROR: setgroups call failed!". Anyone know of a fix?? MWP > Hello > > I was just installing the new TNG 1.0.5 and after i installed and cleaned the > logs i started the dameons and was unable to access the shares on win98. The > computer showed up in Network Neighborhood but i would get a \\comp03

...Treat the register named reg as a fixed register; generated code should never refer to it (except perhaps as a stack pointer, frame pointer or in some other fixed role). reg must be the name of a register. The register names accepted are machine-specific and are defined in the REGISTER_NAMES macro in the machine description macro file. Useful when writing kernel code or other low-level code (e.g. a VM) where you want to reserve a particular register for your own use. Matthew C -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation...

I setup the samba server to be a wins server on my network when ever I browse the network it takes for ever to come up and sometimes it takes awhile to even to bring up the share or I don't see them. I am using lmhost on win xp system and the linux system for dns. When ever I do restart on the samba server it gives me this error. (shutting down nmb services ./smb: line 201: kill (6442) - no

I have a new MDK 9.1 server running iptables, pop, smtp, ftp, www, ssh, and trying tio get samba up on it. The box has two nic's in it. inside net is 192.168.1.0/24 the outside is a /28 net I have uip forwarding running and also shorewall. I also have an older Samba box running on the internal net. The problem is this. All the winblows boxes can see the old samba server but not the new server.

Hi, I installed Samba on Solaris to enable me print from the solaris workstation to a windows print server. When I start smbd and nmbd , smbd does not run but nmbd runs

...amed reg as a fixed register; generated code should > never refer to it (except perhaps as a stack pointer, frame pointer or in > some other fixed role). > > reg must be the name of a register. The register names accepted are > machine-specific and are defined in the REGISTER_NAMES macro in the machine > description macro file. > > > Useful when writing kernel code or other low-level code (e.g. a VM) where you > want to reserve a particular register for your own use. Ya, I saw people writing VM often ask for this functionality on ML. But I have a quest...

Hi, please imagine the following scenario: We have 4 local samba networks consisting of multiple samba machines and Win95 and NT machines as well. They all talk to each other and all works well. We have one central (samba) WINS server for all 4 nets. These 4 nets are connected together and communicate to the outside world through a firewall. Now I want to connect to exactly one share on the

On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 09:23:27AM -0500, Matthew Curtis wrote: > I'm adding support for -ffixed-<reg> for Hexagon and was wondering if I should > do it in such a way that other targets get the support as well by default or if > a given target back-end should have to explicitly opt-in for support. What "-ffixed-<reg>" does? Regards, chenwj -- Wei-Ren Chen

Hi list, i got a problem with my wins server, here is the setup: Linux Debian Sarge 2.4.24 Samba 3.0.1-Debian sometimes nmbd daemon stops with this error in logs: =============================================================== 3759 [2004/02/26 08:23:39, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(37) 3760 INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 268 (3.0.1-Debian) 3761 Please read the appendix Bugs

Folks, I just had a discussion about __builtin_stack_pointer in the GCC list, and there were a number of arguments against it, and it got me thinking I didn't have strong arguments against GNU's named register extension. Does anyone remember the arguments for not implementing that extension? My view is that making it an intrinsic (say @llvm.register(name)) would have the exact same

I'm adding support for -ffixed-<reg> <http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-3.4.3/gcc/Code-Gen-Options.html#index-ffixed-1435> for Hexagon and was wondering if I should do it in such a way that other targets get the support as well by default or if a given target back-end should have to explicitly opt-in for support. Any opinions? Matthew Curtis. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center,

On 27 March 2014 19:35, Krzysztof Parzyszek <kparzysz at codeaurora.org> wrote: > Is there any sane reason to actually implement it? Bare metal code is never sane, but that's not an excuse not to write it. C is a very complete language, especially modern variations like C11, but there's still a lot that can't be done in C and for good reasons. Kernel code and optimal

net use * \\samba\mgerdts Debug level 10 says: [2001/06/22 10:28:49, 1, pid=29656] smbd/password.c:pass_check_smb(554) Couldn't find user 'mgerdts' in smb_passwd file. [2001/06/22 10:28:49, 2, pid=29656] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(951) NT Password did not match for user 'mgerdts'! [2001/06/22 10:28:49, 2, pid=29656] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(961)