search for: register_nam

...1:41, 0] libsmb/nmblib.c:send_udp(754) Packet send failed to 198.147.235.21(137) ERRNO=Invalid argument [2000/01/27 14:41:41, 0] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:send_netbios_packet(170) send_netbios_packet: send_packet() to IP 198.147.235.21 port 137 failed [2000/01/27 14:41:41, 0] nmbd/nmbd_nameregister.c:register_name(362) register_name: Failed to send packet trying to register name STARHAT6<20> [2000/01/27 14:41:41, 0] libsmb/nmblib.c:send_udp(754) Packet send failed to 198.147.235.21(137) ERRNO=Invalid argument [2000/01/27 14:41:41, 0] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:send_netbios_packet(170) send_netbios_pack...

...ing badly formed line in configuration file: /var/log/sambamsg; cat %s >> /var/log/sambamsg; rm %s! & > started asyncdns process 14785 > Packet send failed to 198.172.10.255(137) ERRNO=Invalid argument > send_netbios_packet: send_packet() to IP 198.172.10.255 port 137 failed > register_name: Failed to send packet trying to register name COMP03<20> > Packet send failed to 198.172.10.255(137) ERRNO=Invalid argument > send_netbios_packet: send_packet() to IP 198.172.10.255 port 137 failed > register_name: Failed to send packet trying to register name COMP03<03> >...

...Treat the register named reg as a fixed register; generated code should never refer to it (except perhaps as a stack pointer, frame pointer or in some other fixed role). reg must be the name of a register. The register names accepted are machine-specific and are defined in the REGISTER_NAMES macro in the machine description macro file. Useful when writing kernel code or other low-level code (e.g. a VM) where you want to reserve a particular register for your own use. Matthew C -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundati...

...: line 201: kill (6442) - no such process.) Below is my log from log.nmb. Thanks for everyone's help. [2003/01/15 17:32:20, 0] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:send_netbios_packet(172) send_netbios_packet: send_packet() to IP 4.64.103.255 port 137 failed [2003/01/15 17:32:20, 0] nmbd/nmbd_nameregister.c:register_name(360) register_name: Failed to send packet trying to register name ZEROHOUR<1e> [2003/01/15 17:32:20, 0] nmbd/nmbd_nameregister.c:register_name_response(109) register_name_response: server at IP 192.168.1.20 rejected our name registration of ISERVER<20$ [2003/01/15 17:32:20, 0] nmbd/nm...

...ring if this is a firewall issue. here is a copy of the log file for both the nmb and the smb. nmbd log: [2003/05/05 09:35:26, 0] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:send_netbios_packet(172) send_netbios_packet: send_packet() to IP 192.168.1.255 port 137 failed [2003/05/05 09:35:26, 0] nmbd/nmbd_nameregister.c:register_name(360) register_name: Failed to send packet trying to register name CAD<1e> [2003/05/05 09:35:36, 0] libsmb/nmblib.c:send_udp(756) Packet send failed to 192.168.1.255(138) ERRNO=Operation not permitted smbd log: [2003/05/05 09:30:26, 0] smbd/server.c:main(707) smbd version 2.2.7a start...

Hi, I installed Samba on Solaris to enable me print from the solaris workstation to a windows print server. When I start smbd and nmbd , smbd does not run but nmbd runs

...amed reg as a fixed register; generated code should > never refer to it (except perhaps as a stack pointer, frame pointer or in > some other fixed role). > > reg must be the name of a register. The register names accepted are > machine-specific and are defined in the REGISTER_NAMES macro in the machine > description macro file. > > > Useful when writing kernel code or other low-level code (e.g. a VM) where you > want to reserve a particular register for your own use. Ya, I saw people writing VM often ask for this functionality on ML. But I have a que...

...******** *** 126,131 **** --- 126,137 ---- add_samba_names_to_subnet(wins_server_subnet); + { struct in_addr ip; + ip = *interpret_addr2( "192.168.1.10" ); + add_name_to_subnet( wins_server_subnet, + "AA_BB", 0x0, 0x64, PERMANENT_TTL, REGISTER_NAME, 1, &ip ); + } + #ifndef SYNC_DNS /* Setup the async dns. */ start_async_dns(); This works great since AA_BB is now resolved through the WINS server. Now my question is: Would it make sense to implement this as a global option in smb.conf? It could be similiar to the fol...

On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 09:23:27AM -0500, Matthew Curtis wrote: > I'm adding support for -ffixed-<reg> for Hexagon and was wondering if I should > do it in such a way that other targets get the support as well by default or if > a given target back-end should have to explicitly opt-in for support. What "-ffixed-<reg>" does? Regards, chenwj -- Wei-Ren Chen

...8:23:39, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1408) 3771 BACKTRACE: 12 stack frames: 3772 #0 /usr/sbin/nmbd(smb_panic+0x101) [0x80c23b1] 3773 #1 /usr/sbin/nmbd [0x80b0797] 3774 #2 /lib/libc.so.6 [0x40176498] 3775 #3 /usr/sbin/nmbd [0x806c381] 3776 #4 /usr/sbin/nmbd(queue_register_name+0x6f) [0x806c8cf] 3777 #5 /usr/sbin/nmbd(register_name+0xf2) [0x806b002] 3778 #6 /usr/sbin/nmbd(become_local_master_browser+0x26c) [0x806246c] 3779 #7 /usr/sbin/nmbd(run_elections+0x18c) [0x806445c] 3780 #8 /usr/sbin/nmbd(strftime+0x1b1e) [0x805fdf2] 3781 #9 /usr...

...t it, and it got me thinking I didn't have strong arguments against GNU's named register extension. Does anyone remember the arguments for not implementing that extension? My view is that making it an intrinsic (say @llvm.register(name)) would have the exact same semantics as __builtin_<register_name> has, in that it'll be carried down all the way to SelectionDAG and be just a CopyFromReg from that reg's name. The fact that they remain as intrinsics will guarantee that they will last until SelectionDag and not commoned up or heavily modified. I'm not sure how to make Clang do t...

I'm adding support for -ffixed-<reg> <http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-3.4.3/gcc/Code-Gen-Options.html#index-ffixed-1435> for Hexagon and was wondering if I should do it in such a way that other targets get the support as well by default or if a given target back-end should have to explicitly opt-in for support. Any opinions? Matthew Curtis. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center,

On 27 March 2014 19:35, Krzysztof Parzyszek <kparzysz at codeaurora.org> wrote: > Is there any sane reason to actually implement it? Bare metal code is never sane, but that's not an excuse not to write it. C is a very complete language, especially modern variations like C11, but there's still a lot that can't be done in C and for good reasons. Kernel code and optimal

...s anywhere or on my network, could anyone point out why it might be trying to contact this address? Here's an excerpt from my log.nmbd started asyncdns process 21009 Packet send failed to 192.168.0.7(137) ERRNO=Host is down send_netbios_packet: send_packet() to IP 192.168.0.7 port 137 failed register_name: Failed to send packet trying to register name LEVIATHAN<20> Packet send failed to 192.168.0.7(137) ERRNO=Host is down send_netbios_packet: send_packet() to IP 192.168.0.7 port 137 failed register_name: Failed to send packet trying to register name LEVIATHAN<03> Packet send failed to...